Noah Feldman
Region: US
Tuesday 08 September 2026 16:36:24 GMT
252779
25645
478
1259
Music
Download
Comments
maplemillennial89 :
She’s a professional, that’s why. She’s too conservative for me (personally), but she is intellectually honest, and that is rare.
2026-09-09 10:47:48
2332
Michael West3000 :
What Scalia meant by “I am not a nut” is “I am not Clarance Thomas” 🤣
2026-09-08 17:10:46
2080
TheRevWillNotBeSocialized :
How does she square her Roe V Wade then just that it’s not in the constitution
2026-09-09 00:23:16
125
Richard Roma :
I will never, to my dying day, fully understand how someone who is a genius could be conservative.
2026-09-09 19:50:59
534
leahykm :
She was my teacher. I’m super liberal. I really liked her. I don’t agree with her but I have a lot of admiration and respect for her.
2026-09-09 18:27:22
653
anilisas73 :
I don’t care how brilliant she is. I don’t care how conservative she is. You will never be able tonconvince me that her religious views do not impede on her decisions. And before maga comes in on this…..RELIGION isnt a FACTOR in interpreting the constitution. It shouldn’t be involved at all. I’m not having this argument before come into my comment. I will refer you directly with a link to the areas in the constitution .
2026-09-09 14:52:01
303
Attorney Laureen :
I argued before her at the 7th, I found her to be compassionate (immigration case), insightful, and well prepared- not all justices are knowledgable on the nuances of immigration law. I was pleasantly surprised as we are definitely on opposite spectrums and continue to be as she establishes her voice in the court. I appreciate her integrity most of all, even as I don’t always agree with her decisions.
2026-09-09 12:44:26
117
juliabradley08 :
she’s horrible but at least she’s principled
2026-09-09 09:58:28
578
Eric Garcia :
She’s definitely down for handmaids living 😂
2026-09-14 11:26:01
0
ghostinthemachine69 :
I hate the idea of “Originalists”. I reject that whole concept.
2026-09-09 15:49:46
68
Skylerx910 :
She’s a true originalist for almost everything expect when it comes to religion cause then she is a catholic first and only
2026-09-08 19:34:31
89
danjenski :
I appreciate knowing this. Thank you for sharing about justice ACB
2026-09-13 11:53:59
0
Michele Steele :
Not the point but your hair is *top tier*
2026-09-08 19:58:25
60
Nonopenothankyou :
So, she has integrity. I don’t agree with her philosophies and morals but this is what we should want in a judge
2026-09-09 03:47:05
64
Travis✗topher ☠ :
Well the Republican party has largely drifted away from originalism. They basically shred the constitution now.
2026-09-08 19:05:36
250
Hong Nguyen-Phuong :
Thanks for this analysis. Still I mostly can’t agree with her. Not good for Americans and America.
2026-09-14 02:58:45
0
krazydude :
but didn't follow precedent on roe v wade. and during confirmation lied about it. the supreme court is embarrassing, they don't follow their own rules
2026-09-08 23:06:19
41
Skedussu :
I love this series but it's so disappointing how these intellectual powerhouses are not only driven by their feelings over personal experiences, they intellectualize those feelings into law. Yes they are human too etc etc, but intelligence isnt the same as wisdom and most (coughconservativescough) are lacking in the latter. Self awareness is wisdom, and wisdom brings impartiality, and impartiality is supposed to be the foundational aspect of judicial decisions, right?
2026-09-09 13:56:38
7
dubbayu0u812 :
she’s slippery when it comes to cases involving religion. Her opinion in the coach praying on the 50 yard line was dishonest AF
2026-09-09 02:13:07
13
Justing :
do i agree with her on anything? absolutely not. do i respect her commitment to her principles? yeah
2026-09-09 21:33:26
17
Way Cheaper Than New :
And yet she still lied to Congress during her confirmation hearings when asked about overturning Roe v. Wade. She’s just another Ivy League hypocrite serving the interests of her wealthy masters
2026-09-09 18:36:13
35
jznprs :
i'm just learning here about the history plus tradition doctrine. but it reminded me of Crawford v Washington where Thomas wrote about the Magna Carta and the Spanish Inquisition. this jumping on support of ancient history to work through modern day problems is just weird to me.
2026-09-08 17:36:13
32
Omelette :
Hi Professor Feldman, I doubt you have the time to respond to tiktok comments all day, but this breakdown was really fascinating and it brought up a question I’ve been struggling to answer for a while now. What makes a legal genius(of justice barretts type)? Like what does that entail? Could you talk a little bit about the strengths that you observed?
2026-09-08 23:51:52
20
user7067099866812 :
You are laundering the political project of John Roberts with this nonsense about swing voters. ACB is right wing, and the brunt of her work moves us all to the right, a few counterintuitive votes notwithstanding
2026-09-08 21:05:48
9
great_fox :
Imagine calling someone a “legal genius” in one breath and then go on to talk about how she worships Scalia. She’s a political actor manipulating the law for white supremacy. Not a genius at all
2026-09-09 01:05:47
14
To see more videos from user @professornoahfeldman, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
