@beyondthetent211: Four Months. Three Years. #truecrimetok #lindsayclancy #clancytrial #postpartumpsychosis

Beyond the Tent :

The cold record presents two expert interviews separated by years—and different conclusions about Lindsay Clancy’s mental state. Dr. Phillip Resnick interviewed Clancy roughly four months after her children’s deaths. Dr. Avram Mack interviewed her in April 2026, more than three years afterward. Their opinions about whether she experienced psychosis at the time diverged. Court TV’s reporting Both experts also reviewed records. Interview timing is one factor to consider alongside the evidence reviewed and the reasoning behind each conclusion. Courtroom reporting Review the evidence and state your position: A) TIMING DESERVES SUBSTANTIAL WEIGHT. Explain what an interview closer to the event might capture—and why that matters. B) THE SUPPORTING RECORDS DESERVE MORE WEIGHT. Identify the evidence or explanation that makes an expert’s conclusion persuasive. You can weigh both. What specific evidence would change your mind? Defend your position below. 👇