We want that high bar. Think about it. Do you want an innocent person in jail vs a guilty person free? Mistakes will be made. Where do you want the line drawn? How many in which group would you feel comfortable with? 1-10? 10-1?
2026-09-09 01:48:00
26
bandit-one :
the dude did it out of spite for women. simple as that
2026-09-09 02:34:30
36
Susan Ainley :
I just said in Chicago this so-called there that’s fine for office. She hates everybody Obama. I mean she’s ha ha ha she’s all about for Trump and there’s no way that Chicago is going to turn red. We’re gonna stay blue forever.
2026-09-08 23:42:46
1
Val :
The judge should have allowed the alternate juror to sub this male juror out he seems like he wasn’t following the law or the judges instructions 🥹
2026-09-09 00:33:33
34
pamsrockin :
I am curious (NOT related to this case specifically) if they are now and will going forward see more hung juries? With the climate in the US right now, people seem to dig in to their own opinions more. Just curious
2026-09-09 01:54:41
7
MayorLasMilpas :
because the British!!
2026-09-11 07:08:19
1
Pemkula :
How are you so off on this one? Show me the actual evidence. Please cause I watch the trial and haven’t seen anything that isn’t hearsay.
2026-09-09 08:24:14
0
Marleen :
I think I’m even more perturbed about this case now because Reddington is allegedly asking Trump to pardon Clancy. Is that legal? What is his connection to DT?
2026-09-09 12:03:57
0
skipper855 :
I respect him, good for him. That would of been myself. INSANITY! PLEASE
2026-09-08 23:34:49
2
Evergreen :
Thank you for being a voice of reason in this insanity. What they’re doing to Patrick Clancy is cruel.
2026-09-09 14:16:05
6
Dawn :
We will probably hear his opinion at some Trump press conference or Maga event in the near future.
2026-09-08 23:39:16
9
Angie ♡ :
Also, he never caved with peer pressure when everyone else wanted to get tf outta there to go back to their lives!
2026-09-08 23:42:55
2
emily :
Cause someone’s life is on the line…. That’s why
2026-09-10 18:08:45
2
Sp👀kySideEyestheTrilogy :
Why do you think the judge didn't switch out jurors?
2026-09-09 19:48:55
0
Yousmelllll :
Here in the UK we have the same bar for criminal cases “ beyond reasonable doubt” however the judge can after a specific amount of time passes instruct the jury that they will accept a majority verdict of 11-1 .
2026-09-09 17:18:16
4
Kelly :
I’m thinking he felt extremely powerful in that position and may potentially be planning to write a book. Just a thought …
2026-09-09 10:55:33
2
James Wannabe :
Then this means Patrick when he sues for defamation he doesn’t need a unanimous verdict against all these assholes . High five !
2026-09-09 05:14:35
1
Angie ♡ :
Thank you for the explanation and to the person that asked the question. Very educational. I worked in a law office in high school so this is interesting.
2026-09-08 23:36:20
3
userechoecho :
11-1 is some doubt
2026-09-09 13:19:43
2
RoyalAngelCreations :
People seem to be having a hard time deciding what percentage of doubt is reasonable.
2026-09-11 00:44:46
1
Country girl :
I’m English in our courts we accept 11-1 bc it’s the majority then again it wouldn’t have got to court here, the CPS would have accepted the ppp and we also use dr resnick as the worlds leading expert on mothers who 💀and our psychologist use his work as a diagnostic tool.. she would have been sent to a psychiatric hospital until Doctors determined she was no longer a danger to herself or others and our minister of justice agrees..
2026-09-09 12:39:22
2
peskycat42 :
This is the first US case I have followed enough to know you need a unanimous decision. So used to England where if no unanimous verdict can be had they will accept 11-1 or 10-2 (Scotland 8-7). Of course we dont have Voir Dire either, just a random selection
2026-09-08 23:58:42
2
Skellington King :
Defamation. Or something.
2026-09-09 04:47:47
1
Jennifer :
Hundred bucks says he’s maga chud.
2026-09-09 04:43:12
1
To see more videos from user @mdg650hawk7thacct, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.