it didn’t solve the equation it stole data from a researcher who was solving the equation with codex
2026-09-09 06:21:58
402
Ems :
Honestly 1 million dollars ain’t even enough for how difficult these problems are
2026-09-09 13:23:37
53
Gary Bussy :
OpenAI stole the work from Anthropic researchers
2026-09-10 01:58:14
1
Peyton :
Girl they solved it cause they trained on a researchers private work where he got nearly there and they tried to bribe him to keep him quiet about it … this isn’t a flex of AI it’s a cautionary tale of data security and a reminder that AI cannot come up with new stuff
2026-09-09 15:53:29
35
Angel :
Dont forget that it would have taken one agent, 100 years to solve. I bet that 10,000 mathematicians fully drugged up could do this as well😭
2026-09-09 14:59:48
24
josedio08 :
Their was also a team of mathematician involved at open ai and some pretty serious allegations they indirectly stole someone’s research
2026-09-09 12:23:36
60
ItzLandWhale :
Button if you have no clue what the hell he is talking abt ——>
2026-09-10 00:56:55
0
KarenElizabethZuniga :
OpenAI is taking credit for this when it’s AI stole the work but it’s akin to when ironman created the AI Jarvis and let it access all the digital knowledge and data known to humanity and trained it himself then we see it was able to solve hypotheticals based off Ironmans work. It all comes FROM US
2026-09-10 00:14:22
0
bussy.synthase :
But also it’s important to remember OpenAI can claim anything but it doesn’t mean shit till its peer reviewed
2026-09-09 22:48:23
0
{Real_Andrew_Real} :
and my math teacher still gets mad when i search up “explain to me how to do this problem” instead of js screenshotting the problem and telling ai to solve it 😭✌️💔
2026-09-09 23:33:00
0
michaelwright9749 :
it didn't solve it only found one loophole it was a waste of ton of energy
2026-09-09 10:16:52
7
charles_math :
it’s important to add that there was a incredible leap in progress by humans right before open ai jumped on this, hence why many are talking about possible plagiarism and the fact that ai may have at best just finished a tedious end of the problem. for sure though humans put in the majority of the work for this to happen
2026-09-09 14:44:08
1
Bingus :
This doesnt make up for anything
2026-09-09 21:16:37
0
aydin :
Isn’t it not a solution but just solving a negative? If you find an instance where it can be disproved, it’s not just solving entirely, just that it may not follow the rules we thought.
2026-09-09 18:34:40
0
Santi :
chatgpt will not take the prize money
2026-09-09 17:23:16
1
crocketcricketmate :
This is the worst
2026-09-09 12:17:22
0
certifiedsimp :
idk about solve complex problems. if anything this and that one Jacobian conjecture show that AI models are good at searching and trying different things out rather than solving.
2026-09-09 12:09:06
1
Gaetan :
People in the field had known for a few years that using forcing was probably one way to solve NS. The solution isn’t exactly “human readable”. It’s a cool demonstration of effort though! Also more perhaps more interesting is the feud between open ai and Anthropic about it
2026-09-09 03:48:52
10
troy :
its crazy how this took ai 10,000 creators and 9 hrs; this only took me (1 person) a few minutes to solve
2026-09-09 23:03:32
0
scott danforth :
let's go ASI
2026-09-09 16:04:42
2
Halal Pork :
Answer means nothing…
2026-09-09 10:24:35
0
austin :
Now solve p vs np
2026-09-09 21:11:28
1
user7673076120610 :
Prize: 1 million dollars. Cost to operate the AIs to solve the problem: several million dollars. They really just did it for the love of the game lmao
2026-09-09 15:04:53
0
Tim^Buff :
Now make it profitable
2026-09-09 11:26:24
0
To see more videos from user @techlorde, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.