@write_zare: from share😂❤️ #fouryou #fypp #writer_sero #funnyvideos #viralvideo

Ꮇᴜɴᴀᴢᴀʀ🥷🏾⚡️

Open In TikTok:

Region: SO

Wednesday 09 September 2026 09:29:11 GMT

26373

2553

139

3742

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.51MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.36MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

່ :

our Aya dorty🥰

2026-09-10 14:31:44

3

ZUHEYB🔥🙃 :

Hello Gabar Best friends Nqono👋😍🖤💕

2026-09-10 07:13:15

0

#Aყɴɴɴʜ•🤢🥀 :

Lacagg Mia thy Mrknn ku Jclaanyo ?🥰🥀

2026-09-09 10:21:28

28

Amin muparik😍❤️ :

inta duhur khamisa dawaneyso like isara😂🥰

2026-09-10 10:51:33

11

🧃❣️ :

yaan saxipnaa

2026-09-10 16:33:02

0

SoFiYa😮‍💨🌸 :

How are you🤨😏

2026-09-10 14:30:42

0

❤️🫂♾️عائشة :

no 😂

2026-09-09 20:07:00

1

🚩 :

inta oysy 😭

2026-09-10 17:19:49

0

To see more videos from user @write_zare, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

KUMBANG TANDUK PANJANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN KUMBANG BOMBARDIER Pertarungan seru di dunia serangga terjadi saat kumbang tanduk panjang menghadapi kumbang bombardier yang terkenal dengan “senjata kimia”-nya. Saat terancam, kumbang bombardier menyemprotkan cairan panas beracun sebagai mekanisme pertahanan diri yang unik. Akankah kumbang tanduk panjang mampu bertahan, atau justru mundur menghadapi serangan mematikan ini? Saksikan duel menegangkan yang memperlihatkan strategi #SeranggaUnik #DuelAlam #BombardierBeetle #LonghornBeetle #FaktaHewan #WildlifeIndonesia

KUMBANG TANDUK PANJANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN KUMBANG BOMBARDIER Pertarungan seru di dunia serangga terjadi saat kumbang tanduk panjang menghadapi kumbang bombardier yang terkenal dengan “senjata kimia”-nya. Saat terancam, kumbang bombardier menyemprotkan cairan panas beracun sebagai mekanisme pertahanan diri yang unik. Akankah kumbang tanduk panjang mampu bertahan, atau justru mundur menghadapi serangan mematikan ini? Saksikan duel menegangkan yang memperlihatkan strategi #SeranggaUnik #DuelAlam #BombardierBeetle #LonghornBeetle #FaktaHewan #WildlifeIndonesia

@alihasnainjigri

@alihasnainjigri

#creatorsearchinsights #لطفا__لایک_و_فالو__از_یادتان__نرود

#creatorsearchinsights #لطفا__لایک_و_فالو__از_یادتان__نرود

Let’s solve this grammar challenge together! 😊 The correct answer is: ✅ B) have had The complete sentence: 🧳 If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t have had their luggage lost at the airport. Why? Because this sentence uses the Third Conditional with a causative structure. The speaker is talking about an unreal situation in the past: ⏰ If they had left earlier… Meaning: 👉 They did not leave earlier. 👉 Something went wrong because of that. The structure of the Third Conditional is: ✨ If + had + past participle, would have + past participle When we add the causative structure: ✨ wouldn’t have had + object + past participle Meaning: 👉 They would not have arranged for their luggage to become lost. 👉 They would not have experienced this problem. Examples: ✅ If I had planned better, I wouldn’t have had my flight cancelled. ✈️ ✅ If she had checked her documents, she wouldn’t have had her passport lost. 🛂 Now let’s check every option carefully! 👇😊 ❌ A) have “If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t have their luggage lost at the airport.” This is incorrect because the conditional form is incomplete. ❌ After: ✨ wouldn’t we need the correct conditional structure: ✅ wouldn’t have + past participle For past situations: ❌ wouldn’t have ✅ wouldn’t have had Also, the meaning changes: “I wouldn’t have my luggage lost” sounds like a present/future situation, not a past regret. The sentence talks about something that already happened, so we need: ✅ wouldn’t have had their luggage lost ❌ B) have had Actually, this is the correct answer! ✅💚 “If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t have had their luggage lost at the airport.” Let’s break it down: ✨ had left = unreal past condition ✨ wouldn’t have had = unreal past result ✨ their luggage = the thing affected ✨ lost = past participle Meaning: 👉 If they had left earlier, this problem would probably not have happened. Compare: ❌ They lost their luggage. (They did the action.) ✅ They had their luggage lost. (The situation happened to them.) This is a causative idea because they experienced a problem caused by another situation. ❌ C) got “If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t got their luggage lost.” This is incorrect because after: ✨ wouldn’t we cannot use the past form got. ❌ The structure is: ✅ would have + past participle Not: ❌ would got Also, “got their luggage lost” is a different causative form, and if we used it in the Third Conditional, we would need: ✅ They wouldn’t have got their luggage lost. So the option is missing have. ❌ D) having “If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t having their luggage lost.” This is incorrect because having is the -ing form. ❌ After modal verbs like: would, could, should, we use: ✨ the base form Examples: ✅ would have ❌ would having ✅ could have gone ❌ could going So: ❌ wouldn’t having ✅ wouldn’t have had 🏆 Final answer: B) have had ✅ Quick grammar reminder! 🌟 Third Conditional: ✨ If + had + V3, would have + V3 Examples: ✈️ If I had arrived earlier, I would have caught my flight. 📄 If she had checked the details, she would have avoided the mistake. Causative form: ✨ have/get + something + done Examples: 🧳 They had their luggage checked. 🚗 She had her car repaired. 🏠 He had his house renovated. Remember: 💭 Unreal past → would have had So: “If they had left earlier…” = a past situation that cannot be changed The answer must be: 💚 wouldn’t have had 😊 #EnglishGrammar #LearnEnglish #EnglishTips

Let’s solve this grammar challenge together! 😊 The correct answer is: ✅ B) have had The complete sentence: 🧳 If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t have had their luggage lost at the airport. Why? Because this sentence uses the Third Conditional with a causative structure. The speaker is talking about an unreal situation in the past: ⏰ If they had left earlier… Meaning: 👉 They did not leave earlier. 👉 Something went wrong because of that. The structure of the Third Conditional is: ✨ If + had + past participle, would have + past participle When we add the causative structure: ✨ wouldn’t have had + object + past participle Meaning: 👉 They would not have arranged for their luggage to become lost. 👉 They would not have experienced this problem. Examples: ✅ If I had planned better, I wouldn’t have had my flight cancelled. ✈️ ✅ If she had checked her documents, she wouldn’t have had her passport lost. 🛂 Now let’s check every option carefully! 👇😊 ❌ A) have “If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t have their luggage lost at the airport.” This is incorrect because the conditional form is incomplete. ❌ After: ✨ wouldn’t we need the correct conditional structure: ✅ wouldn’t have + past participle For past situations: ❌ wouldn’t have ✅ wouldn’t have had Also, the meaning changes: “I wouldn’t have my luggage lost” sounds like a present/future situation, not a past regret. The sentence talks about something that already happened, so we need: ✅ wouldn’t have had their luggage lost ❌ B) have had Actually, this is the correct answer! ✅💚 “If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t have had their luggage lost at the airport.” Let’s break it down: ✨ had left = unreal past condition ✨ wouldn’t have had = unreal past result ✨ their luggage = the thing affected ✨ lost = past participle Meaning: 👉 If they had left earlier, this problem would probably not have happened. Compare: ❌ They lost their luggage. (They did the action.) ✅ They had their luggage lost. (The situation happened to them.) This is a causative idea because they experienced a problem caused by another situation. ❌ C) got “If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t got their luggage lost.” This is incorrect because after: ✨ wouldn’t we cannot use the past form got. ❌ The structure is: ✅ would have + past participle Not: ❌ would got Also, “got their luggage lost” is a different causative form, and if we used it in the Third Conditional, we would need: ✅ They wouldn’t have got their luggage lost. So the option is missing have. ❌ D) having “If they had left earlier, they wouldn’t having their luggage lost.” This is incorrect because having is the -ing form. ❌ After modal verbs like: would, could, should, we use: ✨ the base form Examples: ✅ would have ❌ would having ✅ could have gone ❌ could going So: ❌ wouldn’t having ✅ wouldn’t have had 🏆 Final answer: B) have had ✅ Quick grammar reminder! 🌟 Third Conditional: ✨ If + had + V3, would have + V3 Examples: ✈️ If I had arrived earlier, I would have caught my flight. 📄 If she had checked the details, she would have avoided the mistake. Causative form: ✨ have/get + something + done Examples: 🧳 They had their luggage checked. 🚗 She had her car repaired. 🏠 He had his house renovated. Remember: 💭 Unreal past → would have had So: “If they had left earlier…” = a past situation that cannot be changed The answer must be: 💚 wouldn’t have had 😊 #EnglishGrammar #LearnEnglish #EnglishTips

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy