patmatos :
I'm trying to understand what you're getting at, but I find it a little ridiculous that you're also trying to dismiss the message. So, for example, are you telling me that hatred isn't caused by another person? In other words, that hatred isn't fueled by what another person does, but simply exists because of the individual? Through experiences, trauma, abuse, rejection, contempt, and all the negative emotions that can come from an interaction, are you telling me that it's simply an individual's fault for having those emotions? I agree with you when you say that you can have feelings of hatred and that you have a choice in what you do with those feelings. To a certain extent, you are responsible for your actions, but you can't expect everyone to have the courage or the strength to change those feelings immediately. Yes, he has a choice in how he acts, I don't agree with everything in the manifesto he makes, but at the same time, I don't agree with you trying to project, contextualize, and dehumanize a human being. Hatred doesn't just appear out of nowhere. It comes from internalization, from something that someone has experienced, from someone who has influenced those feelings, from the information they've been exposed to and the experiences they've had. It's ridiculous. Sometimes people draw conclusions because they want to draw conclusions, and they end up generalizing. That's their choice. It's not correct, but it is their choice. What you're defending in such a ridiculous way, while claiming that you're trying to protect men and teach them, isn't actually helping or teaching anyone. You're literally shaming and discriminating against people who may already feel so rotten, so broken, so horrible inside because of who they have become, and you're acting as if it's always a choice. It isn't always a choice. It isn't. If you don't have anyone around you to help you, if there are no women who are willing to understand or care, then why are you trying to generalize?
2026-09-10 11:23:35