@itsallpolitics__: The reactions to this trial might be why a historically low number of women believe were respected in society

Heyitsliz :

So you think they should just blatantly not follow the law? That juror admitted he had reasonable doubt and still broke the law but not following the law. You can’t have it all ways.

Heather Leigh :

I think until you have been plagued with mental health disorders you can’t actually comment on this case. There is a sentencing of ‘by insanity’ for a reason. If you are out of your mind insane things can happen, out of your control. I’m a neuro nurse and I have seen the brain do some wild things. It’s real, don’t comment on it unless you’ve been there.

dannyboy :

I'm so confused how a murdering mom could be let free. Doesn't 99% of postpartum happen in the 1st few months? Why would she off all three kids??

christinas.catharsis :

Charlie was in no way hateful

kaitlynannhenricks :

I need the lip combo!!!!

aturnbullable :

The “did you even watch the trial” is how they shut down discourse I’m starting to realize

Bystander :

The truth is, for the jury to convict someone for murder, a MOTIVE is needed to persuade them Without motive ("Why would a mother kill her children?"), it's difficult for them to decide to condemn the murderer That's why insanity is the only plausible explanation for them

Abigail :

I’ve followed you for a long time, but did you even watch the trial? I watched all your videos on the trial and it doesn’t seem like you listened to the judge or looked at the evidence at all.

Chapulinpecoso :

Natasha Laik :

You know what it is? They only hate and blame you if you’re Christian or Jewish. Everyone else gets a pass!

vernonlc0 :

[Heartwarming][Heartwarming][Heartwarming]