Absolutely not, the driver carelessly drove his car onto a private property and into the fire hydrant , so he’s responsible for damages to the fire hydrant and his own car
2026-09-10 01:51:27
2
Mohammed Ahmed :
No it’s not fair, he is a habitual offender
2026-09-10 01:52:03
2
Renée Beaupre :
no one commenting how bad it is to cover a fire hydrant
2026-09-10 02:00:36
0
Steven Brown :
yes
2026-09-10 08:00:35
0
pablogeraldineyah :
yes
2026-09-10 01:41:07
1
Michael Knight :
no !! not fare , the guy shouldn't have been driving in the man's yard , he deserved what he got , an should have to pay all of it , teach him to leave people property alone
2026-09-10 01:41:17
1
jlwggns :
that's bullshit.
2026-09-10 04:17:54
0
kathy :
He drove into it to destroy. He should pay nothing for his viscous act
2026-09-10 01:57:34
0
pawpawgaga3 :
Payback!
2026-09-10 01:34:23
0
noelreed736 :
No. Would have been no damage if not for the drivers negligent actions
2026-09-10 21:18:56
0
To see more videos from user @zemontibpi3, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.