@_cyberanna_: It might sound paradoxical to spend $20 million to win a $1 million prize, but the money was never the point. OpenAI has no intention of claiming the reward; they simply wanted to display their compute power. . . . #openai #engineering #aerospace #math #Tech

︎ :

20 million using API yeah, but openai doesnt pay themselves API rates.

Shengy90 :

They didn’t solve anything. They read two researchers private chats with ChatGPT 😂

lily :

88 hours is so crazy i thought this was like a yearly project 😭

w4rloaded :

They did not solve it using AI models.. they took the work of two scientists who used AI for the mathematic calculations.

Tomášjedno :

You're welcome.

erasitexnis_varistas :

20 milion dollars to solve a 1 milion dollar problem 🕺🕺

sonora :

completely stolen btw.

Fleet in Pieces :

Jeff bezoss yachts yacht burns more gas than that a year. This literally advanced all mankind's knowledge of the universe a tiny tiny bit

⠀JohannDegurechaff :

not astra an internal model*

jcs :

20 million is the cost of the tokens if you are an individual. their cost was more eletricity and a much less baseline cost per token, so maybe close to the 1Million tbf

CAD CAM CNC :

Or: 100% fake. It was a joke post mocking OpenAI PR. OpenAI never announced this, there is no Lean proof repository, and Navier-Stokes remains an open Millennium Prize Problem.

DropD! :

Looks like a waste of money

Mr. Stroker :

Not even that much if you compare it to the combined salaries of all the researchers that have been working on this problem

CyberAnna :

Andreskate666 :

[Risa aprobada] , Open ai no reclamó el premio .

d.iconique :

I don’t really understand what this equation is showing tho. Can you explain what this means?

nemeyojin :

how much water ?

Hello Folk :

What is the navier stroke meant to be?

Red :

burned 20m to get 1m prize🥰

brythgr :

But they just copied through researchers work. They didn’t solve anything lol.