GOBLEEN :
His jfa and middle third T1 are on good media, including this upscaled version. I also disagree with your rating of his misc below 8, because even with his falios - which I am well aware of (a less-than-ideal width of the palatal arch, gum exposure, mild facial erythema caused by the film quality of that era and the phenotypic characteristics of his skin, eyebrow and eyelash hair that isn’t dark or thick enough, insufficient density and length of eyelashes, a slightly recessed hairline, brow shape, nasal bulbosity, a philtrum that is too wide and shallow, a neutral-negative orbital vector, slight nasolabial folds, forehead wrinkles, drooping lower eyelid (infra shape), negative hooding, and medial canthus positioning), since these traits are not pronounced enough in him to assign him a misc lower than 8 - especially considering that you did not take into account the aesthetic characteristics of the oral cavity. Likewise, his dimo is not lower than 9.1, so the harmony score is slightly higher due to the two measurements I mentioned above, otherwise, I agree with you, with some reservations
2026-09-11 23:11:52