laughandgrindofficial
Region: US
Saturday 12 September 2026 17:38:04 GMT
50315
1946
192
70
Music
Download
Comments
ItalianGirl :
I BLAME THE JUDGE
2026-09-12 20:12:02
135
HouseOfStreep :
There’s nothing in the state of Massachusetts prohibiting this man from serving on a jury- the law is if you have a felony conviction older than seven years you can serve on a jury. If u have the felony conviction less than seven years ago you cannot or if you have a pending indictment for a felony charge you cannot- this man does not have a pending charge and was never convicted. And the defense and the prosecution definitely knew about this beforehand- they asked jurors questions in the court room. They also had the names of all the jurors. To do background checks. If the juror lied, he could be in a lot of trouble, but really it does not change the case at all. There was no verdict in the Clancy trial. Cannot appeal a mistrial - because there is no “final judgment”
2026-09-12 17:51:18
3
Not Your Business :
“A little dishonest” feels like an understatement.
2026-09-13 06:11:42
0
Jeff :
This one???
2026-09-13 01:20:44
3
Canadian Kim 🇨🇦❌7 :
The minute the Prosecution heard there was a juror not following instructions he should have been immediately vetted.
2026-09-12 18:25:51
176
Tj Laru :
I’m betting most of those jurors lied to get on the jury and they also lied on not being influenced outside of the trial.
2026-09-12 21:29:21
16
Becks :
A little dishonest?! Lying by omission is still egregious. However I still agree with his stance in this case.
2026-09-13 06:10:10
0
KellyP🌹 ❤️🌹 :
They do have the questionnaires. They are saved. But I believe it would be really hard to prove the Prosecution knew about it even though I’m sure they did. I hope he goes after the double jeopardy & wins
2026-09-12 17:53:56
46
amygoberjones🌻 :
I thought that the prosecutor and defense both had to agree on the jurors. Also, the judge should have allowed the juror to be released and altered with another one since the juror was not following the law.
2026-09-12 23:26:00
8
Kirsty :
this but lets talk about the fact they didn't understand the instructions
2026-09-12 18:21:45
155
That Guy :
The prosecution is not responsible to "vet" the jury pool. Both the Defense and Prosecution have the same information and same decision making power when it comes to the jury. Neither side has any more rights when it comes to the jury.
2026-09-12 20:02:16
9
ryland35 :
Well, both attorneys agreed what jury members are picked
2026-09-13 00:12:08
2
M_LaLa81 :
Does the defense have any responsibility to also vet jurors?
2026-09-12 22:49:46
0
Ashley Rachel :
the defense is just as responsible for the jury though
2026-09-12 19:23:28
3
The Feral Fairy 🧚🏻♀️ :
everyone keeps talking about the questionnaires as if the attorneys on both sides don't have the opportunity to ask them particular questions, along with the judge. a standard question that they should have been asked is whether or not the juror has any "life experiences" that would inhibit their ability to be unbiased - a fkn wife and child beater who is in severe debt OBVIOUSLY has experiences that would get him booted, so if he said no, he perjured himself - plain and simple. yes, a juror in Massachusetts can serve even if they have a restraining order out against them. that doesn't mean they can lie about bias while under oath.
2026-09-12 20:41:28
0
zipleaf is selfcare :
.... a little bit dishonest??! BRUH DO NOT
2026-09-12 18:54:14
28
Dennis :
Pheww the prosecution screwed up big time!!
2026-09-13 04:10:11
1
Twinmama09 :
So during jury selection, the defense does not see the forms that the jurors complete?
2026-09-12 18:30:24
0
kate :
everything that is happening is proving those kids in heaven want their mom free. How does 1 get away with all this....Those babies are doing something in heaven ....saying something to someone...
2026-09-12 21:56:19
7
𝓜𝓪𝓶𝓪 𝓑 🦋 :
We all know daddy red ain’t gonna let that go 🤣
2026-09-12 22:29:20
3
Jancy :
Just a little bit dishonest?
2026-09-12 22:23:17
2
CapeCodgirl :
Interesting. It’s never ending. Thanks for the explanation based in reality.
2026-09-12 23:01:55
2
Cster :
They know and we will never see the questionaire
2026-09-12 18:32:43
4
Toronto Vegan 🌱✌🏻 :
a little bit? 😂
2026-09-12 19:09:05
4
Paulie :
Defense has option to vet each juror also.
2026-09-13 04:07:11
1
To see more videos from user @laughandgrindofficial, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
