@maxkamdasky: canasir iyo jiqaay waa lakumaada sida sxda ah✌️🔥#foryoupage #soomalitiktok #fypシ゚viral #fypシ゚viral🖤tiktok☆♡🦋myvideo #maxkamada🦁

maxkamda 🪫sky☠️🥷🪨
maxkamda 🪫sky☠️🥷🪨
Open In TikTok:
Region: SO
Saturday 12 September 2026 19:23:45 GMT
537
39
4
0

Music

Download

Comments

gurta1011
🇬 🇺 🇷 🇹 🇦 ⭐️🇸🇴 :
taagane
2026-09-14 15:07:42
1
munasar.yare.king
S A B I R I N :
🫡🫡🫡🫡👌👌👌👊👊👎👎
2026-09-14 19:10:47
0
saqinhojr
☘️-TONI-🍀 :
🔥🔥🔥
2026-09-13 06:54:41
0
munasar.yare.king
S A B I R I N :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-09-17 16:47:50
0
To see more videos from user @maxkamdasky, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

I am forever seeing “the science says working horses at 2 years old is okay!” being thrown around as though the science is completely conclusive. From the research I’ve done, there simply aren’t enough conclusive studies to tell us what the perfect level of work is for a young horse, or where the line between beneficial loading and excessive loading actually sits. Yes, studies have shown that controlled exercise and loading can help with things like bone density and musculoskeletal development. But we also have to acknowledge the limitations of those studies but often with relatively small sample sizes, controlled conditions, and very specific types and amounts of exercise. Then we have the reality outside those limited study populations. Case after case of horses presenting with issues such as kissing spines and other musculoskeletal problems, many of whom were started and worked young That doesn’t automatically prove that starting a horse at two causes these problems. But surely it is reasonable to ask questions, rather than repeatedly pointing to one study and treating it as the final word while disregarding evidence that doesn’t fit the narrative. If you haven’t already, I strongly suggest following the work of Becks Nairn. She regularly carries out dissections, and unfortunately, a number of the horses examined are relatively young animals who have developed significant pathology during their working lives. Those dissections give us a very different perspective on what can actually be happening beneath the surface and I think that evidence deserves consideration too. How long do we continue to cherry-pick the science that supports what we already want to do? These aren’t bicycles. They are living, breathing animals that perform for us, and sometimes they pay for that performance with their comfort and, ultimately, their lives. I don’t think asking whether we could be doing better is anti-science. I think it’s exactly what science is supposed to encourage us to do. #horses #equine #equestrian #horsewelfare #younghorses
I am forever seeing “the science says working horses at 2 years old is okay!” being thrown around as though the science is completely conclusive. From the research I’ve done, there simply aren’t enough conclusive studies to tell us what the perfect level of work is for a young horse, or where the line between beneficial loading and excessive loading actually sits. Yes, studies have shown that controlled exercise and loading can help with things like bone density and musculoskeletal development. But we also have to acknowledge the limitations of those studies but often with relatively small sample sizes, controlled conditions, and very specific types and amounts of exercise. Then we have the reality outside those limited study populations. Case after case of horses presenting with issues such as kissing spines and other musculoskeletal problems, many of whom were started and worked young That doesn’t automatically prove that starting a horse at two causes these problems. But surely it is reasonable to ask questions, rather than repeatedly pointing to one study and treating it as the final word while disregarding evidence that doesn’t fit the narrative. If you haven’t already, I strongly suggest following the work of Becks Nairn. She regularly carries out dissections, and unfortunately, a number of the horses examined are relatively young animals who have developed significant pathology during their working lives. Those dissections give us a very different perspective on what can actually be happening beneath the surface and I think that evidence deserves consideration too. How long do we continue to cherry-pick the science that supports what we already want to do? These aren’t bicycles. They are living, breathing animals that perform for us, and sometimes they pay for that performance with their comfort and, ultimately, their lives. I don’t think asking whether we could be doing better is anti-science. I think it’s exactly what science is supposed to encourage us to do. #horses #equine #equestrian #horsewelfare #younghorses

About