@bxnnzzzz: A true warrior || #vinlandsaga #thorfinn #thorfinnedit #fyp #viral

Bxnz
Bxnz
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Saturday 12 September 2026 23:57:03 GMT
42079
10549
34
678

Music

Download

Comments

gabehorn691
Gabehorn :
Damn bruh, vinland saga was really one of a kind
2026-09-14 02:19:39
241
luisito.jn
Luisito.jr :
Crunchyroll dub so buns🥀
2026-09-13 18:39:17
94
caloruta
Big ass cookie bite :
YOU CAN GET OUT OF VALHALLA THORFINN COME ON
2026-09-16 20:36:08
10
england0093
England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 :
Each episode had me locked in and teary in some parts , no show accomplished that before or ever after the story and writing is made by an intelligently emotional person who understands pain and suffering of loss and rememberance leading to change , what a masterpiece it was , I won’t read the manga because I want no spoilers ,amen
2026-09-23 10:40:19
0
sssupadupa
abi :
man this episode
2026-09-13 03:28:59
78
danii_y10
不十分だ :
hot take season 2 js as good as season 1 ( if not better )
2026-09-14 21:13:50
9
_foidslayer_7
 :
I love how every1 voted yea
2026-09-14 03:36:50
11
vexor.1600
￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ :
Thorfinn really went through it all and still kept pushing.
2026-09-13 01:26:24
15
tweedledeetweedledumb3
Tweedledeetweedledumb :
2026-09-23 16:37:05
0
abuds199
abuds :
we need a season 3
2026-09-16 20:30:35
20
simao.stn
𝐒𝐓𝐍💤 :
2026-09-22 23:06:55
1
gavinozzzzz
🪽 :
letter pfp theory
2026-09-16 11:49:19
7
jacerd4
Jace :
Love it keep up the great work
2026-09-12 23:59:28
2
1nonlyfaxg
Mousam Mandal :
realisation
2026-09-15 09:05:02
5
aishakb3r
aisha :
Mac Demarco x Vinland Saga 🥹
2026-09-13 01:07:48
1
giyu3929
waflonking :
2026-09-15 01:49:05
0
afghan_forlife1
￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴ ￴￴￴ :
2026-09-13 20:08:29
0
ulq_editz
Ulq :
wanna moot?
2026-09-13 08:50:20
0
chazmcbuffy
McBuffy :
@Wyatt
2026-09-14 01:27:50
0
2gange5
Pell2 :
.
2026-09-23 05:30:00
0
To see more videos from user @bxnnzzzz, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham's number, named after mathematician Ronald Graham, is an unimaginably colossal integer that famously held the Guinness World Record for the largest specific number ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It emerged within the domain of Ramsey theory, a branch of combinatorics concerned with finding order within large, seemingly chaotic structures. The problem that prompted its formulation relates to high-dimensional hypercubes. Consider an n-dimensional cube whose vertices are all connected to each other by line segments, forming a complete graph on 2^n vertices. If every single edge between these vertices is colored either red or blue, one must ask: what is the smallest dimension n that guarantees the existence of a single-color, complete planar subgraph on four coplanar vertices? In 1971, Graham and Bruce Rothschild proved that a finite dimension exists. In 1977, Martin Gardner popularized a massive upper bound established by Graham, which became known as Graham's number (G). Although modern bounds have reduced the upper limit to much smaller figures, Graham's number remains the quintessential symbol of mathematical scale. Because Graham's number utterly defies conventional scientific notation, mathematicians describe it using Donald Knuth’s up-arrow notation. In this system, a single up-arrow denotes ordinary exponentiation: a \uparrow b = a^b. A double up-arrow represents tetration, or an iterated tower of exponents: 3 \uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3^{3^3} = 3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987. A triple up-arrow denotes iterated tetration: 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 corresponds to an exponential tower of threes that is 7,625,597,484,987 layers high. This value is already far too gigantic to write down directly, exceeding the total number of elementary particles in the observable universe (roughly 10^{80}). Four up-arrows, 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3, construct a number known as g_1. In g_1, the number of arrows in the intermediate operational steps dwarfs human comprehension. Yet, g_1 is only the foundation of the construction. Graham's number is built in 64 recursive stages:  *  * g_2 = 3 \uparrow^{g_1} 3 (where the number of arrows equals the value of g_1)  *  * This pattern continues iteratively such that g_{k} = 3 \uparrow^{g_{k-1}} 3. Graham's number is defined as G = g_{64}. The scale of G produces remarkable physical paradoxes. If every digit of Graham's number were printed in Planck-scale typography, the physical volume required would exceed the observable universe billions of times over. Even holding a full mental representation of every digit is physically impossible: the entropy and information density required to store that many bits would collapse a human brain into a supermassive black hole. Despite its incomprehensible size, Graham’s number has precise, known arithmetic properties. Because it is an immense tower of powers of three, its terminal decimal digits can be calculated using modular arithmetic. For instance, its final twelve digits are known to be ...262464195387 #fyp #власов #ww2 #russia #anticommunism
Graham's number, named after mathematician Ronald Graham, is an unimaginably colossal integer that famously held the Guinness World Record for the largest specific number ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It emerged within the domain of Ramsey theory, a branch of combinatorics concerned with finding order within large, seemingly chaotic structures. The problem that prompted its formulation relates to high-dimensional hypercubes. Consider an n-dimensional cube whose vertices are all connected to each other by line segments, forming a complete graph on 2^n vertices. If every single edge between these vertices is colored either red or blue, one must ask: what is the smallest dimension n that guarantees the existence of a single-color, complete planar subgraph on four coplanar vertices? In 1971, Graham and Bruce Rothschild proved that a finite dimension exists. In 1977, Martin Gardner popularized a massive upper bound established by Graham, which became known as Graham's number (G). Although modern bounds have reduced the upper limit to much smaller figures, Graham's number remains the quintessential symbol of mathematical scale. Because Graham's number utterly defies conventional scientific notation, mathematicians describe it using Donald Knuth’s up-arrow notation. In this system, a single up-arrow denotes ordinary exponentiation: a \uparrow b = a^b. A double up-arrow represents tetration, or an iterated tower of exponents: 3 \uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3^{3^3} = 3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987. A triple up-arrow denotes iterated tetration: 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 corresponds to an exponential tower of threes that is 7,625,597,484,987 layers high. This value is already far too gigantic to write down directly, exceeding the total number of elementary particles in the observable universe (roughly 10^{80}). Four up-arrows, 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3, construct a number known as g_1. In g_1, the number of arrows in the intermediate operational steps dwarfs human comprehension. Yet, g_1 is only the foundation of the construction. Graham's number is built in 64 recursive stages: * * g_2 = 3 \uparrow^{g_1} 3 (where the number of arrows equals the value of g_1) * * This pattern continues iteratively such that g_{k} = 3 \uparrow^{g_{k-1}} 3. Graham's number is defined as G = g_{64}. The scale of G produces remarkable physical paradoxes. If every digit of Graham's number were printed in Planck-scale typography, the physical volume required would exceed the observable universe billions of times over. Even holding a full mental representation of every digit is physically impossible: the entropy and information density required to store that many bits would collapse a human brain into a supermassive black hole. Despite its incomprehensible size, Graham’s number has precise, known arithmetic properties. Because it is an immense tower of powers of three, its terminal decimal digits can be calculated using modular arithmetic. For instance, its final twelve digits are known to be ...262464195387 #fyp #власов #ww2 #russia #anticommunism

About