@warsay525: (1) According to the United Nations records, British parliamentary records, IMF historical material, and academic scholarship, the dismantling of Eritrea’s Economic Infrastructure Under British Administration 1941–1952 was real. The extensive dismantling, sale, removal and destruction of Eritrean productive assets claim that all of this was a deliberate British plan to make Eritrea economically non-viable requires careful qualification. Some say the removals were justified as military surplus, war reparations, or disposal of installations; however, the strongest political interpretation is that the economic measures coincided with Britain's proposals concerning Eritrea's future. The British position on Eritrea's future was not fixed throughout the period 1941–1952. It evolved in response to British strategic interests, Ethiopian claims, Italian interests, Eritrean political movements, and—after 1945—the intervention of the United Nations. The evidence shows that Britain considered several possibilities, including merger eastern part of Eritrea into Ethiopia and the other western part into Sudan; or federation with Ethiopia, and eventual British withdrawal. The most important point is that Britain did not initially regard Eritrean independence as its preferred solution.

WARSAY🇪🇷ዋርሳይ)

Open In TikTok:

Region: GB

Monday 14 September 2026 02:22:10 GMT