@crimenightly: 📍 United States 🇺🇸 A police encounter takes an unexpected turn when an officer discovers a substance and begins questioning the person about what it is. The officer explains that if the substance is a drug, he needs to identify it so it can be properly tagged for destruction. He also tells the person that he is not being charged with possession of the substance based on the information given during the conversation. The person questions whether they have to answer, while another individual nearby insists that the officer is being lied to and tells them to explain what the substance is without claiming ownership of it. The situation takes a surprising turn when the substance is identified as cocaine. What do you think—was the officer's approach an effective way to determine what the substance was?