@quant_um_glow: #philosophy #logic #philosophical #smart #god

Mr. Philosoraptor :

This is so confused lol. From God(a) → □E(a), you can infer that if a is God, then an exists necessarily, but you CANNOT infer that a is necessarily God. In other words, necessary existence ≠ necessary Godhood. So ◇¬∃xGod(x) does NOT entail ◇¬E(a). A possible world can contain a while containing no God: E(a) ∧ ¬God(a). Thus □E(a) is perfectly consistent with ◇¬∃xGod(x). The contradiction at P15 is therefore produced by an INVALID modal inference. To make P13 work, you would need the additional premise God(a) → □God(a), which simply assumes that being God is an essential property of a. So the entire argument equivocates between “God necessarily exists” and “this individual is necessarily God.” Once that equivocation is removed, P14 does not follow, P15 never arises, and the contradiction is rendered meaningless. Try again.

.Leo🫪 :

risking it for this RATIO

money.store33 :

S tier rage bait account

Twilyra :

oh yeah well then $^&€(¿€/$€=%€=%€=^/££:£/^/$$#_$÷_#×%*¿¿¿£×7+7€+£+££+£+(+(£+£+£+£+£

mal ☦️ :

worst argument ever LMAO??

ToraAndElma :

God = G Exist = E G = E God exist.

Ennio 𒉭 :

Why dont you just explain in in a way poeple who dont study philosophy understand

71.kjbo :

♰ 𝙡𝙪𝙠𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙨𝙮𝙮 ♰ :

assuming any necessary being has the possibility of non existence already smuggled in the reductio, defining God out of existence, like saying its possible 2+2 doesn't equal 4 therefore it isn't necessarily true that 2+2 equals 4

Sheld :

Какой толк от символов и шифрования? Если можно описать это буквально 3-4 абзацами , а ну да , чтоб другие не поняли , точно

garrett ☦︎ :

Threw in p4 out of nowhere 💔😭

BeetleLarp🌲 :

anything from P3 where she manipulated the form of necessity is a fallacy

dont worry :

it doesn’t disprove god, you just assume incompatible modal premises and then act surprised when theres a contradiction.

•𝙆𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙢∃!• :

This makes no sense at all, how is no one saying anything?

ℭ𝔧𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔢𝔯 :

i cant tell if this is larp or not

Tucker :

Not sure what any of this means but you’re so pretty

pj :

LMFAOOOOOO

FordøyingsTur123 :

Rae :

philosofoid

igor :

P13 is invalid

yeezus :

+()$(!2-8"9!2892937XcvKo--+"* god

pilzi2 :

simonkricko :

. :

p3 and p11 literally contradict themselves

☦️𝘽𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩🇻🇦 :