Gorilla007 :
I call bullshit on this. Their models aren’t even remotely close to being half as capable as this guy is making them sound. Take Opus and Fable, for example. Give them a complex, multi step engineering task and they still depend heavily on the surrounding agent harness, tool calls, external scripts, iterative retries, context management, and orchestration to get anywhere. The harness is doing a huge amount of the actual operational work, taking the model from point A to point Z, feeding it intermediate results, deciding which tools to call, handling failures, looping back when something breaks, and keeping the workflow moving.
And even with all that scaffolding, these models can still struggle with something as concrete as compiling and debugging a Linux kernel or building and debugging Firefox. That’s a very different reality from the autonomous, broadly capable AI this guy is describing.
This is where “AI currently lives.” It’s not some autonomous digital intelligence capable of independently accomplishing whatever you throw at it. It’s a probabilistic text generation model wrapped in an increasingly elaborate software system that provides tools, state, context, retries, verification, and orchestration. Strip away that infrastructure and the underlying model is dramatically less capable at actually doing things in the real world.
“How is it gonna kill us all?” Yeah, not “pretty easy.” Right now, getting an AI agent to reliably perform something as mundane as booking a restaurant table can require a ridiculous amount of tooling, browser automation, state management, retries, and carefully engineered orchestration. Calling that level of capability some kind of unstoppable autonomous intelligence is make believe sci fi.
AI agents? Total scam.
2026-09-15 23:15:21