@ricardo.vega7381:

Ricardo_resell11🔥
Ricardo_resell11🔥
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Tuesday 15 September 2026 17:41:55 GMT
141
4
0
1

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @ricardo.vega7381, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The study I am referring to was published in the Journal of Social & Personal Psychology by Hoy and Oh in August 2024.  “Support” in the study was severely limited imo: they were asked “do they care about you?” “Do they make too many demands?” And asked about friendship strain. All subjective things that anyone with attachment wounds or self hindering beliefs or trauma would view through an impacted, potentially inaccurate lens. The stat significance was p<.001 for infidelity & poorer chronic health and p .66 for infidelity x time. (Latent variable analysis).  It is my personal opinion this study would be much more relevant and impactful if they actually looked at the impact of interventions rather than just the possibility of health impact without specific, measured interventions. Faith as well as the beliefs and viewpoints of the betrayed would also be important in my viewpoint. Victim vs victor mindset would be crucial in my personal opinion. Other things I would consider are resentment and anger levels sustained over time (and not properly confronted, worked through, and released) versus forgiveness, self healing measures, and releasing the trauma somatically. So much depends not on the potential health outcomes, but the interventions and the mindset of the betrayed.  While over 2500 is a reasonable sample size and those that experienced infidelity vs those that haven’t must be compared for control, 663 isn’t the same as studying 2500 people who have been betrayed-which I think is what a lot of people are assuming who are laypeople.  I’m not saying the study is inaccurate. I’m providing more context and hoping people will ask questions-with any study. I’m also saying it doesn’t necessarily matter what the study says because I believe proper intervention can completely change the results of the study. I’m saying don’t let anyone convince you this study has to be your story or your fate if you’ve been harmed.  For those of you with faith, I’m saying this study should be meaningless to you because God is so much bigger than the harm humans can impose on you.  I’m also saying listen to healed people who hold compassion for everyone-even those that have done terrible things. Without the people who hold compassion for those that do terrible things, they don’t get better, and the harm continues. We need people willing to step into the mess and help people step into better versions of themselves. And if you’ve been betrayed, you deserve a better version than suffering long term from chronic health outcomes.  #infidelity #cheating #relationships @Dr Kathy Nickerson
The study I am referring to was published in the Journal of Social & Personal Psychology by Hoy and Oh in August 2024. “Support” in the study was severely limited imo: they were asked “do they care about you?” “Do they make too many demands?” And asked about friendship strain. All subjective things that anyone with attachment wounds or self hindering beliefs or trauma would view through an impacted, potentially inaccurate lens. The stat significance was p<.001 for infidelity & poorer chronic health and p .66 for infidelity x time. (Latent variable analysis). It is my personal opinion this study would be much more relevant and impactful if they actually looked at the impact of interventions rather than just the possibility of health impact without specific, measured interventions. Faith as well as the beliefs and viewpoints of the betrayed would also be important in my viewpoint. Victim vs victor mindset would be crucial in my personal opinion. Other things I would consider are resentment and anger levels sustained over time (and not properly confronted, worked through, and released) versus forgiveness, self healing measures, and releasing the trauma somatically. So much depends not on the potential health outcomes, but the interventions and the mindset of the betrayed. While over 2500 is a reasonable sample size and those that experienced infidelity vs those that haven’t must be compared for control, 663 isn’t the same as studying 2500 people who have been betrayed-which I think is what a lot of people are assuming who are laypeople. I’m not saying the study is inaccurate. I’m providing more context and hoping people will ask questions-with any study. I’m also saying it doesn’t necessarily matter what the study says because I believe proper intervention can completely change the results of the study. I’m saying don’t let anyone convince you this study has to be your story or your fate if you’ve been harmed. For those of you with faith, I’m saying this study should be meaningless to you because God is so much bigger than the harm humans can impose on you. I’m also saying listen to healed people who hold compassion for everyone-even those that have done terrible things. Without the people who hold compassion for those that do terrible things, they don’t get better, and the harm continues. We need people willing to step into the mess and help people step into better versions of themselves. And if you’ve been betrayed, you deserve a better version than suffering long term from chronic health outcomes. #infidelity #cheating #relationships @Dr Kathy Nickerson

About