@casedigestph: Case File 057 A construction supply business insured its stock against fire with three different companies. When the stock burned, all three refused to pay, pointing to a clause that required any other insurance to be declared and written into the policy. The owner argued that the agents he dealt with had known about the other coverage all along, which raised a question: could their knowledge count as notice to the insurance companies? New Life Enterprises can be a reference for understanding how an “other insurance” clause works in a fire policy, and why an agent’s knowledge may not always satisfy what the policy requires from the insured. 📖 New Life Enterprises v. Court of Appeals | G.R. No. 94071 | March 31, 1992 ⚖️ Associate Justice Florenz D. Regalado 🏷️ Insurance Law • Fire Insurance 🗳️ Second Division · All 3 who took part concurred · Paras and Padilla took no part --- DISCLAIMER: The illustrations do not show the actual appearance of any person, product or place. Names, logos and marks of real entities appear only because those entities are part of the case. #CaseDigestPH #InsuranceLaw

Case Digest PH
Case Digest PH
Open In TikTok:
Region: PH
Wednesday 16 September 2026 10:37:07 GMT
16752
651
33
42

Music

Download

Comments

hachidaime20
Aceney :
pro-rating among 3 insurers is a good call I think? or at the very least reimburse the premiums made kasi dapat tine train din ng mga companies ung agents nila to be as truthful as it should be.
2026-09-16 15:58:06
1
antonymsynonym
Maple :
The goal of the policy is to reinstate the policy against financial loss due to perils and the requirement to declare co insurance is a guardrail against abuse. The motive of the policy owner is unjust enrichment as he expect that the stock worth Php 1.00 will be reinstated 3x.
2026-09-16 13:04:55
4
arfftastic
RJER :
That’s why you have to read the fine print.
2026-09-16 12:12:33
4
manila.bae
Manila Bae :
insurance will do everything for you not to qualify for the claim
2026-09-16 11:19:31
81
boysilip09
Boy Silip :
Does it apply to multiple pension
2026-09-16 12:44:19
0
casedigestph
Case Digest PH :
📌 There were four policies across three companies: ₱350,000 from Western; ₱300,000 and ₱700,000 from Reliance; and ₱200,000 from Equitable. Altogether, that was ₱1.55 million in coverage in 1982 — roughly ₱25 to ₱30 million in today’s money.
2026-09-16 10:41:51
17
mangorojohabanero
Mangorojo :
thats why nd nagiinsurance ang most of pinoy dahil sa ganitong modus.
2026-09-16 11:24:41
32
reiner0004
reiner 🫑 :
does this apply to life insurance as well?
2026-09-16 11:11:46
3
philthewonders
Philip C. :
1982 - 1992 case duration. GG
2026-09-16 12:54:50
0
peacemaker_13
Peacemaker_✌️ :
Can u do Rex Sorongon vs People? Case digest namin last sem to eh kaso yung professor di gaano clear yung explanatio 😅
2026-09-16 10:42:17
1
casedigestph
Case Digest PH :
📌 From the admin: Always read the fine print of your insurance policies. Something that can be helpful: if you have a soft copy, run it through an AI tool (e.g. ChatGPT) and ask it to summarize or point out the important parts. Just make sure to still double-check them in the actual policy!
2026-09-16 11:13:24
1
grantasilom
GSA studio :
Insuring the same property with three different policies is invalid due to the principle of indemnity in insurance. You cannot legally recover more than the property is actually worth. Having three policies suggests a clear intent to obtain three times the actual property value, which insurance companies will reject as fraud.
2026-09-16 10:46:55
5
harwaxx
Harold Mir :
ung sa pal nmn vs mga wrongfully dismissed and na naloko dahil sa technicality.
2026-09-16 13:36:02
0
mlueew
mluuew :
not to be the bad guy here, but insuring a store in 3 different insurance companies is already a sus.
2026-09-16 16:21:25
0
brian.dom38
Brian Dom :
best strategy ..@Anderson Clayton
2026-09-16 19:30:15
0
To see more videos from user @casedigestph, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Toutes les personnes qui te disent
Toutes les personnes qui te disent "je t'aime" n'ont pas les mêmes intentions. La différence se voit souvent dans leurs actes. 1. Une femme qui t'aime... Elle veut te voir grandir. Exemple : Quand tu économises pour un projet, elle t'encourage et respecte tes priorités. Une femme qui te manipule... Elle cherche surtout ce qu'elle peut obtenir de toi. Exemple : Elle se fâche parce que tu refuses une dépense inutile, même si tu lui expliques tes raisons. ✅ Ce que tu peux faire Observe si elle soutient aussi tes objectifs ou seulement ses propres envies. 2. Une femme qui t'aime... Elle communique avec respect, même pendant un désaccord. Une femme qui te manipule... Elle utilise parfois la culpabilité, les menaces ou le silence pour te faire céder. ✅ Ce que tu peux faire Choisis une relation où vous pouvez discuter calmement et chercher des solutions ensemble. 3. Une femme qui t'aime... Elle apprécie les efforts que tu fais, même quand ils sont simples. Une femme qui te manipule... Rien ne semble jamais lui suffire. Elle demande toujours davantage. ✅ Ce que tu peux faire Ne mesure pas une relation uniquement par ce que tu dépenses. Regarde aussi la reconnaissance et le respect. 4. Une femme qui t'aime... Elle est présente dans les moments difficiles comme dans les bons. Une femme qui te manipule... Elle apparaît surtout quand elle a besoin de quelque chose. ✅ Ce que tu peux faire Demande-toi si cette personne est aussi là quand toi, tu as besoin de soutien. La leçon L'amour ne cherche pas seulement à recevoir. Il cherche aussi à donner, à respecter et à construire. Avant de t'engager, observe les habitudes d'une personne, pas seulement ses paroles. 💪 Phrase forte Choisis une personne qui t'aide à devenir meilleur, pas une personne qui profite de tes faiblesses. #relation #conseilhomme #psychoféminine #levraimoi #couple

About