1. Home
  2. Detail

@dahliasofea00: @SKIN1004MY #skin1004mycircle #centellasootingcream

Dahliaa
Dahliaa
Open In TikTok:
Region: MY
Thursday 17 September 2026 00:00:00 GMT
10
1
0
0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.41MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.41MB) Watermark .mp4 (0.41MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @dahliasofea00, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos
#ميكب_ارتست #الكوافيرا_طيبه🤎 @Teba. #اكسبور_erolpxe #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂
#ميكب_ارتست #الكوافيرا_طيبه🤎 @Teba. #اكسبور_erolpxe #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂
صلوا عليه وسلموا تسليما كثيرا ❣️(وفي يــــوم الجمعـــة)🦋
صلوا عليه وسلموا تسليما كثيرا ❣️(وفي يــــوم الجمعـــة)🦋 "اللهم ارزقني رزقًا لم أتوقعه، وخيرًا لم أفكر به، وتحقيق أمنيات ظننت يومًا أنها مستحيلة، واستجابة دعوات أكررها دائمًا.اللهم وفقني، وسخر لي، وبشرني، وأرح بالي وقلبي، وأسعدني، واعف عني، وارحمني، وأرض عني، وهب لي ما أتمنى وما أريد، إنك على كل شيء قدير.»#اللهم_امين_يارب_العالمين #صلوا_على_رسول_الله #جمعة #جمعه_معطره_بذكر_الله🕊♡
The future of accessibility is having options. It’s flexible and fluid. And it’s designed in a way that meets a wide range of preferences. Deaf people aren’t a monolith. No disability or culture is. We are capable of creating systems that surpass the limitations we’ve been conditioned to accept. – (Video description: Leila, an Asian woman with long brown hair and a black shirt with a rose on it, sits on a gray couch in a room with dark green wallpaper) TRANSCRIPT: In my last few videos I talked a lot about the topic of Deaf patients who might not want an interpreter at their doctor appointments. Interestingly, some of you discouraged me from advocating for the right to waive an interpreter, because for so long we’ve been fighting to push for our ADA right to an interpreter. Now, you don’t want to risk confusing the doctor’s office into thinking that an interpreter isn’t necessary. I get that. I want to clarify. I personally do prefer to have an interpreter most of the time, but there are certain situations where I’d rather not have one. And, observing that fear of – “if you’re advocating for your right to no interpreter, that will affect my right to an interpreter” That’s a scarcity mindset. As if only one of us can win. So there’s this resistance of push and pull. There’s also the fear of creating confusion at the doctor’s office at the variety of preferences. But that IS the point. Deaf people have different preferences, yes. Disability is not a monolith. We should be advocating for the approach of “not one size fits all”. Which means we should push for flexibility, providing us with options, collaborating with us. To me, the systemic approach with a black-and-white policy is very cold and rigid. I’d love to shift to a more human approach where the patient is engaged in the process, and the provider understands each unique situation. They can accommodate what works best for us. I don’t want to compete with your accommodation preferences. I want us both to win. And I think we can. The future of accessibility should look like having options, having flexibility, being fluid. That is the future I’m envision
The future of accessibility is having options. It’s flexible and fluid. And it’s designed in a way that meets a wide range of preferences. Deaf people aren’t a monolith. No disability or culture is. We are capable of creating systems that surpass the limitations we’ve been conditioned to accept. – (Video description: Leila, an Asian woman with long brown hair and a black shirt with a rose on it, sits on a gray couch in a room with dark green wallpaper) TRANSCRIPT: In my last few videos I talked a lot about the topic of Deaf patients who might not want an interpreter at their doctor appointments. Interestingly, some of you discouraged me from advocating for the right to waive an interpreter, because for so long we’ve been fighting to push for our ADA right to an interpreter. Now, you don’t want to risk confusing the doctor’s office into thinking that an interpreter isn’t necessary. I get that. I want to clarify. I personally do prefer to have an interpreter most of the time, but there are certain situations where I’d rather not have one. And, observing that fear of – “if you’re advocating for your right to no interpreter, that will affect my right to an interpreter” That’s a scarcity mindset. As if only one of us can win. So there’s this resistance of push and pull. There’s also the fear of creating confusion at the doctor’s office at the variety of preferences. But that IS the point. Deaf people have different preferences, yes. Disability is not a monolith. We should be advocating for the approach of “not one size fits all”. Which means we should push for flexibility, providing us with options, collaborating with us. To me, the systemic approach with a black-and-white policy is very cold and rigid. I’d love to shift to a more human approach where the patient is engaged in the process, and the provider understands each unique situation. They can accommodate what works best for us. I don’t want to compete with your accommodation preferences. I want us both to win. And I think we can. The future of accessibility should look like having options, having flexibility, being fluid. That is the future I’m envision
I fear this is a bad habit of mine
I fear this is a bad habit of mine
PART 2 2014 Prophesy of Nnamdi kanu🤯 Nigerians This Man really knows something we don't. #Biafra #nnamdikanu #nigeria #verydarkman
PART 2 2014 Prophesy of Nnamdi kanu🤯 Nigerians This Man really knows something we don't. #Biafra #nnamdikanu #nigeria #verydarkman

About

Legal