Dr Idz (MBBS, MRes, Dip IBLM)
Region: GB
Wednesday 16 September 2026 18:38:26 GMT
908332
23691
959
19824
Music
Download
Comments
Nightshade | Chat_Chaos :
they act like if you eat a singular Taki you're going to die. logically speaking you'd have to eat 4-6 bags in one sitting
2026-09-17 13:16:24
459
Ponkle :
There's a bunch of these accounts fear mongering food to sell their food scanning app
2026-09-16 20:53:57
2246
Emperor Helldiver1 :
I’m still gonna eat it
2026-09-17 01:50:03
187
MrOogah :
Me scrolling to the next video like
2026-09-16 20:30:31
435
SkouseyOtter :
the problem here is that almost anything you injest could be carcinogenic in some way. what really matters is how much risk it actually causes
2026-09-16 20:56:27
572
Cuba :
im still eating them ✌️
2026-09-17 05:49:05
25
none :
Don’t eat taki
2026-09-16 23:43:54
19
Danie :
You can’t compare red meat with glycidyl esters in Takis just because IARC happens to classify both under “probably carcinogenic.” That classification tells you whether something is capable of causing cancer based on the evidence; it does not mean everything in that category has the same chemistry, exposure level or cancer risk. IARC itself makes that distinction. Red meat is an actual food containing protein, iron, B12 and other nutrients. Glycidyl esters are unwanted contaminants formed during high-temperature oil refining, and they can release glycidol in the body. Consumer Reports measured about 3.41 µg per serving in Takis Fuego, compared with California’s 0.54 µg-per-day no-significant-risk level for glycidol. That doesn’t mean one bag of Takis gives you cancer, but it does mean the finding deserves proper context rather than being dismissed with “red meat is also Group 2A.” His argument actually contradicts itself: he correctly says a carcinogen classification does not tell you the size of the risk, then immediately uses the fact that red meat has the same classification to imply people should treat them the same. You can’t have it both ways. Same hazard category does not mean same substance, same dose, same exposure or same risk.
2026-09-18 14:22:33
4
Xhojin🇨🇦 :
they did talk about dosage. they said it was six times higher than the legally accepted limit in that state.
2026-09-16 19:47:57
28
Capital G :
why are we surprised
2026-09-16 18:46:45
57
Ryan76 :
Takis are much worse for you than any kind of steak. I don’t care what kind of degree you got that’s common sense. Put the coloring and a long list of chemicals in the Takis ingredient list and you can count me out.
2026-09-17 23:55:53
0
Chainsaw7@ :
Wow i didn't know that 🤔🤔🤔
2026-10-11 03:08:39
0
Torres :
Red dye 40
2026-09-17 16:47:55
5
SisuDoomguy :
nothing wrong with more information..
2026-10-05 04:45:00
0
nourtrient :
You always come through 🙂↕️
2026-09-16 18:44:15
28
ytubeshortsrbetter :
I heard back in the late '90s or early 2000s that sitting on the couch could lead to cancer. that is when I gave up on listening to what other people say things will do and just live my life because one day I'm going to die but darn it. I'm going to die happy
2026-09-16 22:32:47
9
Jaurdon10 :
Haven't seen one of your videos for a longggg time! welcome back to the FYP
2026-09-16 18:46:01
8
Pretty little weirdo :
are you guys serious right now? I can’t have nothing bro why first fast food restaurants now it’s chips you’ll have to ruin my favorite chips like whyyyyyyyy
2026-09-19 02:00:02
0
coreykolenosky :
Cold Pressed Seed oils are healthy.....over heating, and the industrial seed oils process is very unhealthy.....!!!!
2026-09-16 19:39:02
1
Seenyth :
It’s sounding like you have stocks…
2026-09-17 00:03:10
2
ShadyNBlack99 :
Hot Cheetos has always been better than Takis
2026-10-18 16:25:52
0
galaxy bro :
I don't eat takis im happy
2026-10-08 04:56:32
1
𝓐𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪 :
watching this while eating takis
2026-09-17 21:20:31
1
To see more videos from user @dr_idz, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
