@missniceph: Advisory lang ang amici curiae. Ang Senado pa rin ang magdedesisyon kung 16 ba o hindi. Ang tanong ay kung ano ang denominator. Art. XI, Sec. 3(6) ng 1987 Konstitusyon: "two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate." Davide: "the basis of computing the two-thirds must be the number of senators who are qualified to vote, not the 24." Puno: gumagalaw ang fraction depende sa sitwasyon. Panganiban: kung wala ka sa posisyon para malaman ang totoo, "you should not dare vote." Azcuna, mag-isa: "all means all." Lahat ng 24, kaya 16. Dalawa sa apat ay tumulong sumulat ng Konstitusyon. Magkaiba pa rin ang sagot nila. Comment mo: dapat bang nakapirme ang 16, o dapat gumalaw? Hindi ko sinasabi kung sino ang tama. Ipinapaliwanag ko kung paano binabasa ang probisyon. #NiceToKnow #governancePH #Konstitusyon #amicicuriae #SenateImpeachmentCourt
yes, dapat gumalaw, that is a hearing of a case, now if your not present to hear the case, so what is the basis of your judgment do you think it is fair, it's unfair to the other judges who attend, cause they deliver their judgement accordingly,
2026-09-17 22:02:23
0
Sanie Baldisimo :
2/3 of all members of the senate.
2026-09-17 20:35:24
0
user39048785648 :
i agree w/ Azcuna
2026-09-18 03:37:00
0
Joselito Resuera :
ang 2/3 of all senators which is 16 ,azcuna ay his standpoint is relevant to our political climate,and second senators are only representatives of the voting public,so their must have a survey that the 2/3 of the voting public agrees the change of threshold
2026-09-18 00:36:31
1
JBlue :
Azcuna very clear
2026-09-18 02:41:31
0
faith🤍🇵🇭 :
all means all
2026-09-18 04:33:03
0
ReVT :
kung ipipilit ang 16 hndi na mapapanagot na magnanakaw sa gobyerno
2026-09-17 20:53:21
8
J :
mananatili ang 2/3 kapag walang namatay nag resign or natanggal, ang hndi naka boto automatic no yun
2026-09-17 23:49:17
1
joren :
dun plang sa
(all the members)
ay wla ng dpat pg talunan.
unless eh bendthelaw.
2026-09-17 18:24:45
3
Kapatid na Arlene :
Gumagalaw naman talaga yung 2/3, wala namang debate dun. Ang pinagdedebatihan, ano yung meaning ng all members. What are the circumstances that could change the number of the members, is being absent enough to remove you on the count?
2026-09-17 16:32:36
5
Mr. Kit ⛳️🏌️💚 :
Yes, gumagalaw. If namatay, tinaggal at nagbitiw sa pwesto..yun lang.
2026-09-17 23:49:44
1
louiequidang :
all gani pasabot tanan😁💚
2026-09-18 00:10:46
1
KURT :
DALAWA SILA FRAMER SA 1987 CONSTITUTION PERO SI DAVIDE HINDI SIYA MAIN NAGSULAT SA ARTICLE XI. ISA SI AZCUNA SA NAGSULAT SA ARTICLE XI which talk about IMPEACHMENT. Kaya malapit si azcuna kaysa ni Davide.
2026-09-18 03:25:24
0
kobe666 :
Yung ISA nag Bago ang sinasabi
2026-09-18 03:28:24
0
CLOUD ♓ :
Gumagalaw lang ang 2/3 kung may namatay, natanggal at nag bitiw.
2026-09-17 22:01:08
1
Angat Pinoy :
2/3 . The constitution has given some flexibility?
2026-09-17 22:35:59
0
Derek Dee :
IBA kasi senator sa senator jugde at IBA din ang jugde sa ang NASA room ng Pag lilitis sa wala sa Pag lilitis, kaya dpat bilang jugde at boboto dapat alam lahat ng Ngyayari sa loob para bumuto ng patas 🥰
2026-09-18 03:43:28
0
Ranny Nuñez 121970 :
para nako gumagalaw Ang 2/3 patas rama na baya Kay Kong moubos Ang total sa conviction moubos baya pod Ang total sa aquital
2026-09-18 00:58:15
0
Picktopus :
PRINCIPAL AUTHOR NGA E
2026-09-17 17:37:35
0
Tex :
Depends on their political preferences, 😂my view doon aq sa 3 naging Supreme Court justices, yung isa ass. Justice , iba rin cguro Ang political view Nya.
2026-09-17 22:54:21
0
etuts4free :
2/3 for all the members, kung gagalawin at di na makabuto ang mga nakakulong..lahat gagawin para makulong at di makabuto ang mga oposisyon, kung yan ay 2/3 of all members, regardless pa. walang pananakot na magaganap tulad ngayon l.
2026-09-17 18:48:40
0
user2445578068255 :
the purpose of the trial is to show how the arguments of the prosecution, defense and the evidence goes before they judge the case, so what the hell these four people letting them to vote, these four is a devil advocate
2026-09-17 22:23:18
0
ur.sugartito🇶🇦 :
Parehas ang sagot dati nila CJ Azcuna at CJ Davide. Nag iba si CJ Davide alam niyo na lung bakit[Snicker] Pero si CJ Azcuna hinde niya binale kung anong ginawa nila na batas.
2026-09-17 22:36:30
0
Knibern :
why simple statement or part of the constitution made complicated by the 3 former CJ...need to go back to the school where they graduated and retake the Bar...OMG!
2026-09-17 20:27:59
1
KingDelvie :
Azcuña was the main author of article 11 just so you know.
2026-09-17 23:24:13
0
To see more videos from user @missniceph, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.