1. Home
  2. Detail

@8.2.16: #CapCut

نصتحه عبدღ
نصتحه عبدღ
Open In TikTok:
Region: SO
Thursday 17 September 2026 16:35:38 GMT
136
11
1
1

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.08MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.08MB) Watermark .mp4 (2.94MB) Music .mp3

Comments

inaahmed408
Ugbaad🌷😍 :
aduunkaygii
2026-09-17 16:38:49
0
To see more videos from user @8.2.16, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Dogs are alarm clocks that can't be turned off 😂🐶 #dogsoftiktokviral🐶🦮 #viral #fyp #funnydog
Dogs are alarm clocks that can't be turned off 😂🐶 #dogsoftiktokviral🐶🦮 #viral #fyp #funnydog
Bao lâu rồi bạn chưa đi lượn ngắm hoàng hôn hồ Tây. Người cùng bạn lượn hồ Tây năm ấy, giờ sao rồi ? #hoanghon #hotay #hanoi #khongcanphaihuadauem #xuhuongtiktok
Bao lâu rồi bạn chưa đi lượn ngắm hoàng hôn hồ Tây. Người cùng bạn lượn hồ Tây năm ấy, giờ sao rồi ? #hoanghon #hotay #hanoi #khongcanphaihuadauem #xuhuongtiktok
214 million people saw this AI warning. So we called an emergency debate. The warning came from someone who had worked at both Anthropic and OpenAI. Then a current Anthropic employee backed it publicly. It had spread so far beyond the tech world that a friend of mine who cuts hair and has never really cared about AI messaged me asking, “What the hell is going on?” I then realised a lot of people were probably asking the same question. The problem is, when you speak to people who have spent years studying AI, you get completely opposing answers. So I brought four of them around the same table. Roman Yampolskiy is a computer scientist who coined the term “AI safety” and has spent years studying whether increasingly intelligent systems can remain under human control. Nate Soares leads the Machine Intelligence Research Institute and has spent more than a decade working on AI alignment. He believes we are moving too quickly towards systems we don’t yet know how to reliably control. Ed Zitron thinks much of the AI conversation has become detached from what the technology can actually do today. He believes the industry is overhyping it while distracting us from financial, environmental and social consequences already happening. Andrew McAfee is an MIT researcher and economist who takes a very different view. He thinks we spend so much time talking about what could go wrong that we barely talk about what AI could make better. And that disagreement is what made this conversation so interesting to me. We discussed things like: - How do you control something that eventually becomes smarter than you? - Are the biggest warnings about AI based on evidence or assumptions? - What happens to work and human purpose if AI becomes better at more cognitive tasks? - Are we ignoring problems AI is already creating because we’re obsessed with hypothetical future ones? - Why have Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Geoffrey Hinton all warned us about AI? The question I kept coming back to was simple: What is actually true? Depending on who you listen to, AI is either one of the greatest opportunities humanity has ever created or something we’re racing towards without understanding the consequences. Both claims deserve to be challenged. There were moments in this debate where I genuinely found myself moving between the arguments. That’s the value of putting people who fundamentally disagree in the same room. I didn’t want four people telling me the same thing. I wanted each of them to explain where the other side was wrong. If you’ve watched the last few months of AI news wondering what you’re actually supposed to believe, this conversation is for you. Watch our full conversation now on YouTube, Spotify or Apple Podcasts. Search
214 million people saw this AI warning. So we called an emergency debate. The warning came from someone who had worked at both Anthropic and OpenAI. Then a current Anthropic employee backed it publicly. It had spread so far beyond the tech world that a friend of mine who cuts hair and has never really cared about AI messaged me asking, “What the hell is going on?” I then realised a lot of people were probably asking the same question. The problem is, when you speak to people who have spent years studying AI, you get completely opposing answers. So I brought four of them around the same table. Roman Yampolskiy is a computer scientist who coined the term “AI safety” and has spent years studying whether increasingly intelligent systems can remain under human control. Nate Soares leads the Machine Intelligence Research Institute and has spent more than a decade working on AI alignment. He believes we are moving too quickly towards systems we don’t yet know how to reliably control. Ed Zitron thinks much of the AI conversation has become detached from what the technology can actually do today. He believes the industry is overhyping it while distracting us from financial, environmental and social consequences already happening. Andrew McAfee is an MIT researcher and economist who takes a very different view. He thinks we spend so much time talking about what could go wrong that we barely talk about what AI could make better. And that disagreement is what made this conversation so interesting to me. We discussed things like: - How do you control something that eventually becomes smarter than you? - Are the biggest warnings about AI based on evidence or assumptions? - What happens to work and human purpose if AI becomes better at more cognitive tasks? - Are we ignoring problems AI is already creating because we’re obsessed with hypothetical future ones? - Why have Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Geoffrey Hinton all warned us about AI? The question I kept coming back to was simple: What is actually true? Depending on who you listen to, AI is either one of the greatest opportunities humanity has ever created or something we’re racing towards without understanding the consequences. Both claims deserve to be challenged. There were moments in this debate where I genuinely found myself moving between the arguments. That’s the value of putting people who fundamentally disagree in the same room. I didn’t want four people telling me the same thing. I wanted each of them to explain where the other side was wrong. If you’ve watched the last few months of AI news wondering what you’re actually supposed to believe, this conversation is for you. Watch our full conversation now on YouTube, Spotify or Apple Podcasts. Search "The Diary Of A CEO AI Debate" ❤️👊🏾 #ai #debate #openai #chatgpt #thediaryofaceo
Hábitos coreanos 🇰🇷💕 #tips #GlowUp #girl #acne
Hábitos coreanos 🇰🇷💕 #tips #GlowUp #girl #acne
Saya tinggal sini. Ya, ini dia.#Persembahan #BukanJenaka #ImanHarian
Saya tinggal sini. Ya, ini dia.#Persembahan #BukanJenaka #ImanHarian


About

Legal