@frases_del_quilo1:

Frases_del_quilo

Open In TikTok:

Region: DO

Thursday 17 September 2026 20:13:46 GMT

75977

4711

12

275

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

MELVIN :

si Dios quiere eso vas 🙏🙌🙌🙌

2026-10-30 10:34:32

0

Miguel 522h :

Dios es la vueltas & bendice grandemente

2026-09-21 03:19:45

1

Yamileth Villegas :

amén mi amor te lo mereces 😘😍

2026-09-23 18:15:39

1

Sergio José Diaz :

Amen

2026-09-23 05:05:10

1

Oscar Santo :

amen amén 🙌 🙏

2026-09-18 23:39:31

1

Edickson Santos :

amén 🙏

2026-10-03 21:50:18

1

Nacho Gonzales :

amen

2026-09-22 18:39:18

1

Dama Cabral :

amen 🙏

2026-09-18 13:58:34

1

Deury Ramirez❤️✌️ :

Amén 🙏🏽

2026-09-20 03:08:39

1

Marcos a López :

amén

2026-09-18 01:31:42

1

Yeudy Diaz :

Amén 🙏🙏

2026-09-19 11:58:42

1

Dassiel RM :

amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén amén 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🙏🙏🙏

2026-09-20 02:54:47

1

To see more videos from user @frases_del_quilo1, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

One bearish liquidity sweep gets stopped out. Another plays out. The difference isn't the sweep itself. It's what price did BEFORE it. When price moves above a previous swing high, traders may interpret it as a sweep of buy-side liquidity and start looking for a potential short. But a sweep only tells us that price traded beyond that level. It doesn't tell us whether the wider price structure has shifted bearish. Look at the first chart. Price pushes above the previous high, making the short setup look interesting. But before that move, price hadn't broken the previous significant low. So although we can point to a liquidity sweep, we don't have the earlier bearish break of structure I'm looking for in this particular approach. The illustrated short gets stopped out. That doesn't prove every sweep without a BOS will fail, but it shows why the missing context matters. Now compare the second chart. This time, price breaks below the previous low FIRST. Only afterwards does it rally back above a high, take liquidity and move lower. That's a different sequence: a bearish structural break, followed by a move back into buy-side liquidity. WHY THE ORDER MATTERS In this example, I prefer seeing the break of structure before the sweep. It gives me an additional reason to consider a bearish setup instead of selling just because price has taken a high. It's worth distinguishing this from approaches that wait for a sweep first and then look for a market structure shift. Traders use both sequences, and neither is a guarantee. THE ENTRY STILL NEEDS A PLAN Even with a prior BOS, you still need to assess the entry, invalidation level and possible downside target. Price can sweep a high and carry on rising. A stop loss doesn't become unnecessary just because several things appear to line up. And two selected chart examples aren't evidence that one entry method has a higher win rate. That would need a properly tested sample of trades, including costs. The takeaway: don't look at a liquidity sweep in isolation. Look at the price structure that developed BEFORE it. Follow for more price action trading and market structure breakdowns. #LiquiditySweep #BreakOfStructure #MarketStructure #PriceActionTrading

One bearish liquidity sweep gets stopped out. Another plays out. The difference isn't the sweep itself. It's what price did BEFORE it. When price moves above a previous swing high, traders may interpret it as a sweep of buy-side liquidity and start looking for a potential short. But a sweep only tells us that price traded beyond that level. It doesn't tell us whether the wider price structure has shifted bearish. Look at the first chart. Price pushes above the previous high, making the short setup look interesting. But before that move, price hadn't broken the previous significant low. So although we can point to a liquidity sweep, we don't have the earlier bearish break of structure I'm looking for in this particular approach. The illustrated short gets stopped out. That doesn't prove every sweep without a BOS will fail, but it shows why the missing context matters. Now compare the second chart. This time, price breaks below the previous low FIRST. Only afterwards does it rally back above a high, take liquidity and move lower. That's a different sequence: a bearish structural break, followed by a move back into buy-side liquidity. WHY THE ORDER MATTERS In this example, I prefer seeing the break of structure before the sweep. It gives me an additional reason to consider a bearish setup instead of selling just because price has taken a high. It's worth distinguishing this from approaches that wait for a sweep first and then look for a market structure shift. Traders use both sequences, and neither is a guarantee. THE ENTRY STILL NEEDS A PLAN Even with a prior BOS, you still need to assess the entry, invalidation level and possible downside target. Price can sweep a high and carry on rising. A stop loss doesn't become unnecessary just because several things appear to line up. And two selected chart examples aren't evidence that one entry method has a higher win rate. That would need a properly tested sample of trades, including costs. The takeaway: don't look at a liquidity sweep in isolation. Look at the price structure that developed BEFORE it. Follow for more price action trading and market structure breakdowns. #LiquiditySweep #BreakOfStructure #MarketStructure #PriceActionTrading

The Last Supper, Sunwaves edition. 🙏 #cIbcItr

The Last Supper, Sunwaves edition. 🙏 #cIbcItr

What a beautiful night that I have lots of new arrivals #handmade #LULULUKI

What a beautiful night that I have lots of new arrivals #handmade #LULULUKI

comment télécharger une vidéo sans logo avec haute résolution possible ?🎦📲

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy