Broken Ruune
Region: US
Friday 18 September 2026 13:18:02 GMT
141246
14526
624
705
Music
Download
Comments
Akila Maduranga :
European mind cant begin to comprehend the depth of buddhist philosophy
2026-09-19 06:32:25
447
daethicaluncheese :
A guy with a supernatural unrealistic religion claims another supernatural unrealistic religion is supernatural and unrealistic
2026-09-19 03:15:55
287
Kaique :
I will answer point by point. *First: imagine the flame of a candle that lights a second candle, is the flame of the second candle the same flame of the first candle? No, but it exists because of the first candle, this is rebirth, all about cause and effect, karma. And no, we aren't karma, saying that we are karma itself would be like saying a flame is heat; heat is the manifestation of the reaction, just as the individual is the temporary result of the karmic flow. *Second: Samsara does not exist as a location or a creation; it is merely the dynamism of a process. In Buddhism, Samsara is not a cosmic structure made to house beings, nor is it a physical space where we were placed. Samsara is the name given to illusion in motion. Samsara exists in the same way that a whirlpool exists in water. The whirlpool was not created by anyone and has no substance of its own; it is simply the result of forces, currents, and pressures interacting at a given point. Samsara is exactly that: a mechanical storm maintained by the relationship between three constituent factors: Primordial Ignorance (Avidya), where the mind by nature does not immediately perceive itself as it is, failing to see impermanence and interdependence; Action/Intention (Karma), where due to this failure of perception, the mind reacts to the world by trying to grasp what it likes and push away what it hates, generating residual energy; and Inertia/Continuum (Samskara), where this energy creates the momentum (the habit) that makes the stream of consciousness continue projecting itself into new forms and experiences. When we ask why something exists, we are usually looking for two things: a First-Causal Origin ("Who turned on the engine?") and an Extrinsic Purpose ("What is this for?"). For Buddhism, the universe has no point zero (an uncaused primary cause) nor an architectural blueprint. Asking why Samsara exists is like asking "Why does 2 + 2 equal 4?" or "Why does fire burn?". Samsara is simply the natural result of laws of cause and effect (Dharma). If there is ignorance and attachment, the cycle of Samsara inevitably manifests; if ignorance and attachment cease, Samsara simply dissolves.
2026-09-19 04:44:37
40
🇻🇦LETTUCE🇻🇦 :
these were the question that lead me away from Buddhism to Catholicism
2026-09-18 13:39:40
498
Grgz 🌍🔅 :
Bro is trying to make it "make sense" 😭😭😭
2026-09-18 20:00:54
468
a :
isn't reincarnation without keeping your memories or personality just the same as normal, scientific death? your conscience is gone forever
2026-09-18 16:04:42
1188
newjc :
in my opinion, the issue is you’re looking for some objective ontological worldview when buddhism doesn’t try to provide that. buddhism at its core is a practical way of life for humans. it deals with what we experience firsthand and tells us how to enjoy our lives. there are no meanings to life or transcendental truths - nothing permanent exists at all. all that exists is constant change, and we do our best to observe it
2026-09-19 06:21:31
24
sphsphsph :
Buddhism isn't metaphysics-centered, it is reduce_suffering_by_any_means_necessary-centric. coherent metaphysics is secondary to reaching enlightnment
2026-09-18 14:37:11
97
Eli Sarver :
“I want” brother I think that’s the issue here
2026-09-18 18:07:20
77
Lewis Carroll :
All religions to their core are mystical, paradoxical, and inconsistent if they were all completely well defined, understood, and measured it would be a science not a religion.
2026-09-18 19:00:02
39
Jron☸️⚛️♾️ :
"i hate buddhism" then misinterprets buddhism
2026-09-18 21:32:06
83
Cynical_by_Design :
"If there is no ego, then What is reincarnating in the first place?" the Observer silly, the act of witness is reincarnating. The world is an illusion, a mirror, a play. I've seen the same actors play many roles in many stories. When the part they play does not have the qualities of the last, does this mean they are not the same performer? why do the roles have to carry over with the performer? who is real: the character or the performer?
2026-09-18 15:21:59
14
Reuben :
Bro hating on a religion like his is the “correct” one
2026-09-19 08:18:24
11
jjj235891 :
I think you're philosophically incoherent
2026-09-18 20:48:38
0
idk1090 :
-Sunyata, Anatta count as non-contigent. thats why buddhist didnt trying to question them and even if you tring to question them you will be obsessed with it,which delays the pragmatic teachings of buddhism -I dont know of this religion survive logical collapse into some other belief or not but buddha already said to try the pragmatic teachings first if its work,Not just going on around use logic and playing language game as objective truth
2026-09-19 01:45:55
1
Pulse :
awareness as no identity, it appears through different form, existence itself is one form of awareness nun existence too is awareness you me God universe dream all are part of awareness appearing
2026-09-19 14:11:21
0
August Kyaw Soe Han :
Buddha denied to talk about reincarnation.
2026-09-19 13:27:10
0
the-absolute-light :
You’re confusing grammatical rules for how reality works. The subject/object duality is the illusion. No one needs to be there in order for what is to arise. It isn’t really incoherent, it just doesn’t map onto how you were taught to speak/think. The false presupposition is that there needs to be a subject in order to have a verb. That isn’t ultimately so, that’s just language structure.
2026-09-19 13:25:58
0
Juju ☸️ :
1: Think of the rebirth stuff as 2 balls, one stationary, one in motion . ball A rolls and hits ball B which was stationary, and then it began to move. Ball B is Completely different from Ball A, but but Ball B moved only because of the kinetic energy of Ball A. Ball A is one who dies, Ball B is one who is born. A good word is “continuation”. the Goal of practice, which is Nirvana, or cessation, is when there is no more kinetic energy, so the Ball A can no longer cause Ball B to move, because the fuel (kinetic energy) is depleted. Kinetic energy in this example is Craving, (to put it incredibly vaguely) as it drives Samsāra the same way the kinetic energy drives the balls.
2026-09-18 22:56:45
17
anakin :
“Metaphysical claims that aren’t grounded in reality” bro u just described any and all religions [Tears of joy]
2026-09-18 17:00:37
165
sooner or later :
The funniest part is that you’re not actually criticizing Buddhism, you’re criticizing Buddhism for not being Christianity. Almost every “contradiction” here is just “Buddhism doesn’t have the Christian answer to this, therefore it makes no sense.” No eternal soul does not equal no rebirth. Buddhism explains rebirth through causal continuity, not some little soul jumping from Nancy into Bob. No creator God does not equal no truth either. You’re simply assuming that truth MUST be grounded in a God, then declaring Buddhism incoherent because it rejects your assumption. And “Buddhism says life has no meaning” is also a massive strawman. Buddhism rejects a God-given cosmic purpose, not meaning, compassion, morality, or goals. Dukkha also doesn’t mean “all pain is evil and must be avoided.” It means something much closer to the unsatisfactoriness of conditioned existence. Buddhists can obviously accept suffering for a greater good, the entire Bodhisattva ideal makes that pretty damn obvious. You can disagree with Buddhism all you want, but saying “this doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t work like Christianity” isn’t a critique of Buddhism. It’s just judging another religion by the metaphysical rules of your own.
2026-09-18 17:25:51
407
天 :
“Personally I need a reason” lol
2026-09-18 17:38:52
48
Petr Prker :
Actually Buddhism doesn’t believe in reincarnation, it believes in rebirth which is probably why you are confused. Reincarnation implies there is a self that moves into the next body. Rebirth is that there is no fixed self, just a consciousness taking a new form.
2026-09-19 06:24:42
5
backstabboi :
Christianity is the right one
2026-09-19 09:06:53
11
Mr. Wolfe :
it has always seemed to me like Buddhism is not even a religion, it's a philosophy like Stoicism that borrowed more concepts and explanations than it needed
2026-09-19 02:21:03
13
To see more videos from user @brokenruune, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
