@ywtgsgsvzgzzjjzn:

m
m
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Saturday 19 September 2026 04:50:52 GMT
626
67
0
11

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @ywtgsgsvzgzzjjzn, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Kapag ang buong atensyon ng namumuno ay nakatuon sa kapwa pulitiko at kalaban sa halip na sa bayan  hindi iyang paglilingkod, kundi pagpapaligaya ng sarili. Ang Pilipinas ay hindi dapat maging larangan ng away ng dalawang pamilya  ito ay bayan ng bawat Pilipino, ng bawat pamilya, ng bawat mamamayan na naghihirap at umaasa. Hindi ang Duterte o ang Marcos ang dapat na prayoridad  kundi ang gutom, ang kawalan ng trabaho, ang kahirapan, at ang kinabukasan ng ating mga anak. Kapag ang oras at lakas ay nauubos sa bangayan at pagtutuos ang taumbayan ang laging nawawalan. Tandaan ninyo: ang tunay na lider ay hindi nakatingin sa kung sino ang kalaban  nakatingin siya sa kung sino ang kanyang pinaglilingkuran. At kung ang bansa ay nasa likod ng personal na hidwaan hindi tayo uunlad, habang-buhay tayong maghihirap. Awit 82:3–4
Kapag ang buong atensyon ng namumuno ay nakatuon sa kapwa pulitiko at kalaban sa halip na sa bayan hindi iyang paglilingkod, kundi pagpapaligaya ng sarili. Ang Pilipinas ay hindi dapat maging larangan ng away ng dalawang pamilya ito ay bayan ng bawat Pilipino, ng bawat pamilya, ng bawat mamamayan na naghihirap at umaasa. Hindi ang Duterte o ang Marcos ang dapat na prayoridad kundi ang gutom, ang kawalan ng trabaho, ang kahirapan, at ang kinabukasan ng ating mga anak. Kapag ang oras at lakas ay nauubos sa bangayan at pagtutuos ang taumbayan ang laging nawawalan. Tandaan ninyo: ang tunay na lider ay hindi nakatingin sa kung sino ang kalaban nakatingin siya sa kung sino ang kanyang pinaglilingkuran. At kung ang bansa ay nasa likod ng personal na hidwaan hindi tayo uunlad, habang-buhay tayong maghihirap. Awit 82:3–4 "Ipagtanggol ninyo ang mahina at ang ulila; bigyan ninyo ng katarungan ang kapus-palad at ang dukha. Iligtas ninyo ang mahihirap at ang nangangailangan; iligtas ninyo sila sa kamay ng masama." Filipos 2:3–4 "Huwag kayong gumawa ng anuman dahil sa paghahangad ng kapangyarihan o sa walang kabuluhang pagmamataas, kundi sa kababaang-loob, iginagalang ninyo ang isa't isa na higit pa sa inyong sarili. Bantayan ninyo hindi lamang ang inyong sariling kapakanan, kundi pati na rin ang kapakanan ng iba." Amos 5:24 "Ngunit dumaloy nawa ang katarungan na parang tubig, at ang katuwiran na parang malakas na agos hindi puro salita, hindi puro bangayan, kundi tunay na paglilingkod sa bayan."
my music choice is good ngl @freddy | Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3,	 if  n=1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3,	 if  n≥2.  {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in #edit #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #makemefamous #foryoupage #fypシ
my music choice is good ngl @freddy | Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in #edit #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #makemefamous #foryoupage #fypシ

About