@tommybjr_: el cuti educando. ☠️ #romero #bellingham #argentina #inglaterra #mundial

Tommy 🇸🇪

Open In TikTok:

Region: AR

Sunday 20 September 2026 23:42:11 GMT

491063

136789

1150

7325

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.36MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (3.68MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.67MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Alexander_YO :

Que foto nos dió Enzo Fernández

2026-09-21 03:05:36

12105

maxii愛🧣 :

quien es bellingham?

2026-09-21 02:59:22

1481

gabriel :

me cansaste bellingham. Hola si, paredes? 📞

2026-09-21 04:50:59

832

Ephram :

romero and who?????[Tears of joy][Tears of joy][Tears of joy][Tears of joy][Tears of joy][Tears of joy][Tears of joy]

2026-09-21 07:00:54

2

dylaan🏠🎮 :

el 10 de Inglaterra? domado por el 5 de boca 🤷🏻‍♂️

2026-09-21 00:41:30

7094

sabrina :

nuestro futuro capi cuti romero 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

2026-09-21 01:07:48

1077

DNL/lgnss🖤 :

y quien es el que ganó?

2026-09-21 18:18:33

13

⭑𝒫𝓇𝒾 ⭑ :

eduque cuti eduque

2026-09-21 00:36:28

199

tobi :

romero and who?

2026-09-21 21:08:41

1

Salvi :

de que le sirve ser el 5 del Madrid si el 5 de boca y el 29 de River lo domaron como si nada

2026-09-21 01:13:43

2748

Valentina :

Leandro, cuti, Enzo y Giuli papás de Bellingham 😍🔥

2026-09-21 14:17:34

68

￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ :

da igual, es el hijo de españa

2026-09-21 15:39:13

5

Cristian Ramirez :

los ingleses viendo la remontada

2026-09-21 01:58:05

351

🎀Nagi🐈 :

provoca y termina perdiendo,lamentable lo de bellingham

2026-09-21 13:04:57

48

pawciox :

2 place 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

2026-09-21 16:39:56

0

XAFFI_AAS-0.5 💋 :

Bellingham Father 😉

2026-09-21 19:26:55

0

Josee🥊🩸 :

amigo que pedazo de edit, se va viral esto

2026-09-21 01:28:12

160

🐧luzzx :

Jude Bellingham ídolo

2026-09-21 13:06:59

0

channie :

los argentinos somos la pesadilla de bellingham 🤣🤣

2026-09-21 01:18:56

279

what_a_dude :

Que loco que todas las súper estrellas principales del Madrid se fueron humilladas por Argentina, Mbappe, Vinicius y Bellingham

2026-09-21 02:09:42

1999

Lucks :

los madridistas cuando ven la uña de Messi:

2026-09-21 17:12:31

64

Tade_Toledo :

el dicho dice:" El que ríe último ríe mjr" y a Bellingham no se salió, lloró primero y lloró último🤣

2026-09-21 01:51:28

29

milanesa con tuco 🇦🇷 :

yo no entiendo que le pasa a esta generación de futbolistas

2026-09-21 01:56:37

55

THE GOAT :

el que no baile es del vadrid

2026-09-21 17:47:15

37

tttii :

Van a volar cabezas con cuti de capitán de la selección

2026-09-21 01:57:11

30

To see more videos from user @tommybjr_, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Từ vựng hôm nay chúng ta có: Khai thác thương mại😆 --- #VieON #DatVietVAC #tiktokgiaitri #TinhHaSayHi #THSHPremium #TinhHaSayHiPremium

Từ vựng hôm nay chúng ta có: Khai thác thương mại😆 --- #VieON #DatVietVAC #tiktokgiaitri #TinhHaSayHi #THSHPremium #TinhHaSayHiPremium

The social media land rush on Threads is a playing field skewed towards established creators. I think this could potentially hurt the app long term. With the app being tied to your existing IG account the big accounts are getting bigger. I'd argue that's one of the downsides of the app. It makes it more difficult for new creators and communities to grow. As a result, I think it unlikely anyone other than established IG creators to feel invested in the app long term. Alex Zhu, founder of Musically (which sold to TikTok), made the analogy that the early adopters of a platform are like the early settlers of a country. They take the lion's share of the spoils because there's little competition. Older countries (or platforms) have an established ’class’ and upward mobility becomes increasingly difficult as time goes on. As a result each new generation wants to move on to new territories. Given the established 'class' of creators on IG come with a built in audience I think it disincentivizes new generations of creators. Threads, in its current state, is less a land of opportunity and more a fortress of the established, where the locked gates of Instagram fame deny entry to fresh talent. Additionally, is 100 million users in 5 days a good thing long term? Playing devils advocate... I'm skeptical. Sure... social apps thrive as markets, where creators and consumers converge. You have two audiences you need to keep content - creators and consumers. To create a flywheel for growth it's essential to strike a balance between the two. Creators want audiences, while audiences desire content. Everyone wants more users. But, history has shown that the most thriving social apps didn't start with a bang. They began as intimate communities, nurturing shared interests and fostering a sense of belonging. Facebook’s growth strategy is a great example of this - it started as a closed community for Harvard, and then Ivy League universities, then all US universities, etc. Twitter - started out as a niche, nerdy, silicon valley centric app Twitch - stemmed from core gamers None of these immediately went mass. Bigger isn’t always better for a few reasons: Rapid growth dilutes commonalities Going mass too quickly dilutes the core interests and values that brought the community together in the first place. Personal connections suffer: Scaling rapidly makes it harder for individuals to establish meaningful personal connections within the community. Decreased engagement and content quality: Mass expansion leads to an overwhelming amount of content, often resulting in decreased engagement and lower-quality content. Fragmented identity and culture: Rapid growth can lead to the emergence of subgroups with conflicting values, potentially fragmenting the community's identity and culture. Successful platforms like Facebook and Twitter began with a focused approach, gradually expanding while maintaining a core foundation of shared experiences. Balancing growth with preserving the community's values and commonalities is crucial for long-term success. What do you think? #threads #threadsforinstagram #twitterthreads

The social media land rush on Threads is a playing field skewed towards established creators. I think this could potentially hurt the app long term. With the app being tied to your existing IG account the big accounts are getting bigger. I'd argue that's one of the downsides of the app. It makes it more difficult for new creators and communities to grow. As a result, I think it unlikely anyone other than established IG creators to feel invested in the app long term. Alex Zhu, founder of Musically (which sold to TikTok), made the analogy that the early adopters of a platform are like the early settlers of a country. They take the lion's share of the spoils because there's little competition. Older countries (or platforms) have an established ’class’ and upward mobility becomes increasingly difficult as time goes on. As a result each new generation wants to move on to new territories. Given the established 'class' of creators on IG come with a built in audience I think it disincentivizes new generations of creators. Threads, in its current state, is less a land of opportunity and more a fortress of the established, where the locked gates of Instagram fame deny entry to fresh talent. Additionally, is 100 million users in 5 days a good thing long term? Playing devils advocate... I'm skeptical. Sure... social apps thrive as markets, where creators and consumers converge. You have two audiences you need to keep content - creators and consumers. To create a flywheel for growth it's essential to strike a balance between the two. Creators want audiences, while audiences desire content. Everyone wants more users. But, history has shown that the most thriving social apps didn't start with a bang. They began as intimate communities, nurturing shared interests and fostering a sense of belonging. Facebook’s growth strategy is a great example of this - it started as a closed community for Harvard, and then Ivy League universities, then all US universities, etc. Twitter - started out as a niche, nerdy, silicon valley centric app Twitch - stemmed from core gamers None of these immediately went mass. Bigger isn’t always better for a few reasons: Rapid growth dilutes commonalities Going mass too quickly dilutes the core interests and values that brought the community together in the first place. Personal connections suffer: Scaling rapidly makes it harder for individuals to establish meaningful personal connections within the community. Decreased engagement and content quality: Mass expansion leads to an overwhelming amount of content, often resulting in decreased engagement and lower-quality content. Fragmented identity and culture: Rapid growth can lead to the emergence of subgroups with conflicting values, potentially fragmenting the community's identity and culture. Successful platforms like Facebook and Twitter began with a focused approach, gradually expanding while maintaining a core foundation of shared experiences. Balancing growth with preserving the community's values and commonalities is crucial for long-term success. What do you think? #threads #threadsforinstagram #twitterthreads

JUST BE YOU…. ITS YOUR LIFE…. BUT ME? IM GONE…. #MAXB

JUST BE YOU…. ITS YOUR LIFE…. BUT ME? IM GONE…. #MAXB

J’ai eu chaud 😂#prank #humour #visibilité @Zman Fruity OfflicieL @Bélèni Officiel

J’ai eu chaud 😂#prank #humour #visibilité @Zman Fruity OfflicieL @Bélèni Officiel

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy