@parkerbrofrwn: This is just my Tuesday.#NoMiracleClaim #RelatableFaith #AskTheComments

QuietPrayer
QuietPrayer
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Tuesday 22 September 2026 03:56:09 GMT
22
0
0
0

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @parkerbrofrwn, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

11:11. Assuming positive intent. I’ve been seeing this concept circulating a lot lately, and I actually love that people are talking about it. Assuming positive intent is essentially choosing not to immediately assign malicious motives to somebody. It means approaching conflict with curiosity and good faith, while still leaving room for accountability, discernment, and the impact of someone’s actions. But there’s something that comes up for me every time I see concepts like this suddenly become popular in spiritual and so-called 5D conscious spaces. I learned language like this years ago through social justice, community organizing, and restorative justice spaces. And this isn’t about saying, “We did it first.” This isn’t about ego. It’s about erasure. Because so much of what gets presented as “new consciousness,” “New Earth,” “5D,” or some revolutionary new way of relating to one another… is not new. Human beings have been practicing community accountability, reciprocity, restorative approaches, relationship with the Earth, collective care, ceremony, conflict resolution, and mutual responsibility for generations upon generations. Indigenous and Aboriginal peoples around the world have maintained sophisticated ways of understanding relationship — to community, land, spirit, and one another — long before somebody packaged those ideas into modern spiritual terminology. And social movements have built architecture too. There are people who fought, organized, bled, strategized, cared for communities, created language, built institutions, challenged laws, and transformed culture so that many of us can even have the conversations we’re having today. Harriet Tubman. Sylvia Rivera. Queer and trans organizers. Black organizers. Indigenous organizers. Women. Working-class people. Disabled organizers. So many people whose names we know, and countless people whose names history never recorded. And I think spirituality becomes dangerous when it wants the wisdom without the lineage. When it wants liberation without remembering who fought for liberation. When it wants “unity consciousness” without understanding power. When it wants “New Earth” without honoring the people who have been protecting the Earth. Because if you don’t know where you came from, you cannot fully understand where you are. And if you don’t understand where you are, how are you qualified to tell everybody where we’re going? That’s the issue I have with a lot of self-appointed conscious leadership. Leadership without historical consciousness is incomplete. Spirituality without lineage can become appropriation very quickly. And transcendence without accountability can become another way of avoiding reality. So yes — assume positive intent. Practice compassion. Practice restorative relationship. Talk about collective consciousness. Dream about what humanity can become. But cite your teachers. Honor your ancestors. Learn the movements. Know the history. Bow to the people whose backs your platform is standing on. Because there is no “New Earth” that requires us to forget the old one. There is no higher consciousness in erasure. And there is nothing evolved about taking ancient or movement-born wisdom, removing the people who carried it, and presenting it as revelation. Spirituality that requires historical amnesia is not higher consciousness. Remembering is part of the awakening.
11:11. Assuming positive intent. I’ve been seeing this concept circulating a lot lately, and I actually love that people are talking about it. Assuming positive intent is essentially choosing not to immediately assign malicious motives to somebody. It means approaching conflict with curiosity and good faith, while still leaving room for accountability, discernment, and the impact of someone’s actions. But there’s something that comes up for me every time I see concepts like this suddenly become popular in spiritual and so-called 5D conscious spaces. I learned language like this years ago through social justice, community organizing, and restorative justice spaces. And this isn’t about saying, “We did it first.” This isn’t about ego. It’s about erasure. Because so much of what gets presented as “new consciousness,” “New Earth,” “5D,” or some revolutionary new way of relating to one another… is not new. Human beings have been practicing community accountability, reciprocity, restorative approaches, relationship with the Earth, collective care, ceremony, conflict resolution, and mutual responsibility for generations upon generations. Indigenous and Aboriginal peoples around the world have maintained sophisticated ways of understanding relationship — to community, land, spirit, and one another — long before somebody packaged those ideas into modern spiritual terminology. And social movements have built architecture too. There are people who fought, organized, bled, strategized, cared for communities, created language, built institutions, challenged laws, and transformed culture so that many of us can even have the conversations we’re having today. Harriet Tubman. Sylvia Rivera. Queer and trans organizers. Black organizers. Indigenous organizers. Women. Working-class people. Disabled organizers. So many people whose names we know, and countless people whose names history never recorded. And I think spirituality becomes dangerous when it wants the wisdom without the lineage. When it wants liberation without remembering who fought for liberation. When it wants “unity consciousness” without understanding power. When it wants “New Earth” without honoring the people who have been protecting the Earth. Because if you don’t know where you came from, you cannot fully understand where you are. And if you don’t understand where you are, how are you qualified to tell everybody where we’re going? That’s the issue I have with a lot of self-appointed conscious leadership. Leadership without historical consciousness is incomplete. Spirituality without lineage can become appropriation very quickly. And transcendence without accountability can become another way of avoiding reality. So yes — assume positive intent. Practice compassion. Practice restorative relationship. Talk about collective consciousness. Dream about what humanity can become. But cite your teachers. Honor your ancestors. Learn the movements. Know the history. Bow to the people whose backs your platform is standing on. Because there is no “New Earth” that requires us to forget the old one. There is no higher consciousness in erasure. And there is nothing evolved about taking ancient or movement-born wisdom, removing the people who carried it, and presenting it as revelation. Spirituality that requires historical amnesia is not higher consciousness. Remembering is part of the awakening.

About