CourtDawgDaniel
Region: US
Tuesday 22 September 2026 19:42:56 GMT
40431
858
92
45
Music
Download
Comments
Michelle Cassara :
Patrick did it!
2026-09-22 22:27:00
10
HappyG :
I love the analysis. My initial problem is her heart rate. She was tachycardic most of the day, per the Apple Watch. Tachycardia is hr >100. At one point she was about 96. Then at 5:16, she was in the 70’s. At 5:23, 57 beats per minute. That a resting or sleep induced or drug induced heart rate. She was seen down at 5:50. The baby revived at 6:40. Medically, none of these things add up. And the core body temp. Even hemorrhaging and multiple traumas, a core body temp dropping that rapidly to that degree, is near impossible. And I thought the EMT’s said they intubated her with an OPA?? I could have gotten that wrong, but you cannot intubate with an OPA if the person is remotely conscious due to the gag reflex. So, how did she ever speak with a crushed thyroid. I’m not into conspiracy theories and I believe mental health can be an issue, but missing DNA on the murder weapons, but found some unidentifiable and his? (Wrong wording I know, but it’s late and I’m exhausted). When there are doctors and nurses and police and private investigators and EMTs around the world saying this does not add up, something does not add up. Did they ever consider a third-party? She was informed of what she did is what I heard during the trial. The evidence, medically, doesn’t add up to her doing it. A heart rate of 57 bpm would be a very lethargic individual who would not have the strength to squeeze those bands tight enough around a neck. None of this makes sense.
2026-09-23 01:31:46
64
Fraulein85 :
this is thoughtfully presented but focuses on the wrong thing: physical evidence. mens rea comes only after actus reus has been established. it hasn't here because it could not have been. too many things were missed in the investigation.
2026-09-28 13:32:38
13
JDoddsCP23 :
What is the evidence that she did it?
2026-09-23 18:12:51
20
CourtDawgDaniel :
I promised you my verdict dawgs. This is where I landed after watching the evidence, listening to the experts, and wrestling with it all the way through the mistrial.
2026-09-22 19:44:27
49
smxshhh :
Well I mean, it’s clear the commonwealth couldn’t prove their case ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ and that’s entirely what it boils down to. Imagine if, instead of the commonwealth having a burden to the standard of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, the central question was instead: “on a balance of probability, who is more likely to be correct?” In a situation like this, whether or not Lindsay is criminally responsible becomes a lot more contested.. so much so that I think the government could win this case if this is how the law worked in Massachusetts, but since the defence had an overwhelming advantage in terms of burden of proof in Massachusetts, it’s not very hard to defend against given Lindsay’s past medical history. I think there’s two separate questions people should ask themselves: 1) Who won the legal battle, and 2) What actually happened to Lindsay on January 24th, 2023, because the answers to 1) and 2) are allowed to be different, and it’s likely reasonable if they are actually different. The legal question given to jurors is different from “well, what did we think actually happened? Is there perhaps some nuanced complicated answer? Or is it black and white?”
2026-09-22 23:56:47
5
Lyn :
But she did understand that what she was doing was wrong. Dr. Resnick testified that Lindsay believed no one else could properly care for her children if she were dead. Because she was suicidal, she made the decision to take her children with her rather than leave them behind. Her mental illness may help explain her thinking, but the decision itself was still a choice she made for her kids.
2026-09-22 23:21:25
1
KazzaMalazza :
very well presented statement sir...👏
2026-09-22 21:28:37
21
sacredsoulshift :
I appreciate you sharing your thought process through it all, and it makes sense. Gives me pause to challenge my own belief. But I still feel that there was no physical evidence that pointed directly and only to Lindsay. That doesn’t mean I don’t think she did it, honestly I’m not sure, but I say not guilty because the state did not prove to me beyond a reasonable doubt. Having been through a few hard depressions myself - but no where near postpartum, it is extremely difficult to ask for help. She did an amazing job at that. Having a supportive family is crucial - and this is not evidence but makes me question other things - my husband would never leave me at the hospital or not visit me even when I strongly tell him not to.
2026-09-23 17:05:14
7
Eithne :
Great analysis Court Dawg, thoroughly enjoyed your reportings of the case and hearing your thoughts! Love from Ireland 🇮🇪
2026-09-22 22:31:22
15
SJCJW :
Well this video has proven to me that people only see what they want to see and can't expand of their own mind actuality!
2026-09-22 23:40:38
6
baesym :
Very thoughtful analysis, that brought up things that hadn’t crossed my mind. Thank you for this.
2026-09-22 20:50:05
7
mary_mel :
kindly repeat this video but with voice, so we can hear what you re saying and not only reading. Its creating dizziness on this monitor to read this way, for so long.. Don't think its too much work to do this. I stopped watching in the middle even I was very curious about what your verdict is.
2026-09-23 04:48:08
7
Blair 🩵🦓🪬 :
Ad someone who is very seriously ill and harmed by psychiatric medications..some of these doctors dont listen to their patients and have no place in prescribing drugs
2026-09-27 06:47:55
1
Gerlinde Martin Caru :
I don’t think the commonwealth did a good job. It was like they were not trying very hard to convince me.
2026-09-23 00:18:14
3
🇮🇪🇮🇪Sunshine yellow🇮🇪 :
a very great read thank you
2026-09-22 20:42:12
7
R&RXplores :
notice how someone who was there everyday,listened to the actual evidence and watched the trial isn't pointing the finger at Patrick?
2026-09-22 23:05:31
1
KT :
I disagree whole heartedly. all in love but no reddington would disagree as well. maybe littke bits but no. Just no
2026-09-23 06:56:51
9
annon2000020202 :
Who is this guy?! 😳
2026-09-22 21:51:17
4
NoNo :
Very well thought out and articulated presentation of facts and your conclusions in this difficult case. Thank you.
2026-09-22 21:30:21
4
Kristel Brouwer - Ve :
your analyses are spot on! I think you gave us a honest verdict based on evidence not on likeability
2026-09-23 11:14:24
2
Jessie :
Thank you, this made a lot of sense.
2026-09-23 21:21:03
1
PR :
Well written
2026-09-23 03:50:27
1
bellaboo62 :
Fully agree . I watched you from the beginning and like you I at first thought man slaughter but after alllll the evidence something just didn’t add up for me and I will be honest it still doesn’t. To many unanswered questions that needs to be addressed
2026-09-23 08:28:31
1
Allyson :
I actually agree with you, almost 100%!
2026-09-22 23:55:10
1
To see more videos from user @court_dawg_daniel, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
