@deemthummarat: เหมาะสมแล้วที่น้องจะได้แชมป์ครับ คือโชว์ของน้องดีจัด ตั้งแต่รอบแรกจนถึงรอบ Final #DeemThummarat #NeneRoyal #sevennationarmy #boluoguitar #agt

Deem Thummarat

Open In TikTok:

Region: TH

Thursday 24 September 2026 08:18:44 GMT

6148

274

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (11.85MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (22.25MB) Watermark .mp4 (23.52MB) Music .mp3

Comments

วัตถุ ลึกลับ :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-09-24 12:27:24

Yo :

😉😉😉

2026-09-24 09:00:55

romelahadae :

👍👍👍

2026-09-24 15:11:41

Adul Janae :

🔥

2026-09-24 20:14:02

phimchanokprasoet :

😁😁😁

2026-09-24 16:35:21

To see more videos from user @deemthummarat, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

makeup tuto posted 💋#hiri #fy #makeup

#news #usa #tiktok #foryou

*You mean “a dignified guy outfit” to handle a _bad day_, right? 😎 So you still look firm + confident even when you’re in a _bad mood_, the key is: simple, neat, and neutral colors. A dignified outfit = people automatically respect you. ### *3 Formulas for a Dignified Guy Outfit to Beat Bad Days* 1. Smart Casual CEO Mode For college, work, or hanging out but still respected - Top: Plain Oxford shirt in navy, black, or white. Roll up the sleeves a bit. - Bottom: Chino pants/ankle pants in khaki, charcoal, or black. No rips. - Shoes: Loafers, Chelsea boots, or clean white sneakers. - Extra: Leather/steel watch + sunglasses. *Vibes:* Calm but dominant. Bad day steps aside. 2. Monochrome Minimalist The easiest but with a strong effect - Top: Fitted black crew neck/henley T-shirt, not oversized - Bottom: Black dress pants or slim-fit black washed jeans - Outer: Overshirt or chore jacket in a matching color - Shoes: Boots or full black sneakers *Vibes:* Mysterious, focused, no drama. 3. Old Money Clean Look Looks expensive without big logos - Top: Neat polo shirt or linen shirt in earth tones: olive, cream, mocha - Bottom: Straight-cut dress pants in beige/off-white - Shoes: Premium white sneakers or penny loafers - Extra: Leather belt, sleekly styled hair *Vibes:* Mature, classy, bad days don’t dare to bother you. --- ### *The Key to Being Dignified So Bad Days Lose:* 1. Fit is king: Clothes that fit your body > expensive clothes that are too big 2. Dark & neutral colors: Black, navy, gray, olive = instantly look firm 3. Neat from head to toe: Hair, nails, shoes clean. Messy = dignity drops 4. Don’t overdo accessories:** 1 watch is enough ### *Hashtag # * If you want to post OOTD on a bad day but still look dignified:#baBadDayEdition #BerwibawaDuluBadDayKemudian #OutfitTegas #CleanLook #meninblack

Northwest Airlines Flight 85 faced an extraordinary emergency over the Bering Sea on October 9, 2002. The Boeing 747-400 suddenly rolled left after its lower rudder became stuck during cruise at 35,000 feet. With 404 people on board, the crew had to find a way to control the aircraft and reach Anchorage. #Northwest #boeing747 #Flight #aviation

$Idea: @𝚔𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 🇷🇺 Graham's number, named after mathematician Ronald Graham, is an unimaginably colossal integer that famously held the Guinness World Record for the largest specific number ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It emerged within the domain of Ramsey theory, a branch of combinatorics concerned with finding order within large, seemingly chaotic structures. The problem that prompted its formulation relates to high-dimensional hypercubes. Consider an n-dimensional cube whose vertices are all connected to each other by line segments, forming a complete graph on 2^n vertices. If every single edge between these vertices is colored either red or blue, one must ask: what is the smallest dimension n that guarantees the existence of a single-color, complete planar subgraph on four coplanar vertices? In 1971, Graham and Bruce Rothschild proved that a finite dimension exists. In 1977, Martin Gardner popularized a massive upper bound established by Graham, which became known as Graham's number (G). Although modern bounds have reduced the upper limit to much smaller figures, Graham's number remains the quintessential symbol of mathematical scale. Because Graham's number utterly defies conventional scientific notation, mathematicians describe it using Donald Knuth’s up-arrow notation. In this system, a single up-arrow denotes ordinary exponentiation: a \uparrow b = a^b. A double up-arrow represents tetration, or an iterated tower of exponents: 3 \uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3^{3^3} = 3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987. A triple up-arrow denotes iterated tetration: 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 corresponds to an exponential tower of threes that is 7,625,597,484,987 layers high. This value is already far too gigantic to write down directly, exceeding the total number of elementary particles in the observable universe (roughly 10^{80}). Four up-arrows, 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3, construct a number known as g_1. In g_1, the number of arrows in the intermediate operational steps dwarfs human comprehension. Yet, g_1 is only the foundation of the construction. Graham's number is built in 64 recursive stages: * * g_2 = 3 \uparrow^{g_1} 3 (where the number of arrows equals the value of g_1) * * This pattern continues iteratively such that g_{k} = 3 \uparrow^{g_{k-1}} 3. Graham's number is defined as G = g_{64}. The scale of G produces remarkable physical paradoxes. If every digit of Graham's number were printed in Planck-scale typography, the physical volume required would exceed the observable universe billions of times over. Even holding a full mental representation of every digit is physically impossible: the entropy and information density required to store that many bits would collapse a human brain into a supermassive black hole. Despite its incomprehensible size, Graham’s number has precise, known arithmetic properties. Because it is an immense tower of powers of three, its terminal decimal digits can be calculated using modular arithmetic. For instance, its final twelve digits are known to be ...262464195387. #fyp #edit #russia #ww2 #ussr$
Idea: @𝚔𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 🇷🇺 Graham's number, named after mathematician Ronald Graham, is an unimaginably colossal integer that famously held the Guinness World Record for the largest specific number ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It emerged within the domain of Ramsey theory, a branch of combinatorics concerned with finding order within large, seemingly chaotic structures. The problem that prompted its formulation relates to high-dimensional hypercubes. Consider an n-dimensional cube whose vertices are all connected to each other by line segments, forming a complete graph on 2^n vertices. If every single edge between these vertices is colored either red or blue, one must ask: what is the smallest dimension n that guarantees the existence of a single-color, complete planar subgraph on four coplanar vertices? In 1971, Graham and Bruce Rothschild proved that a finite dimension exists. In 1977, Martin Gardner popularized a massive upper bound established by Graham, which became known as Graham's number (G). Although modern bounds have reduced the upper limit to much smaller figures, Graham's number remains the quintessential symbol of mathematical scale. Because Graham's number utterly defies conventional scientific notation, mathematicians describe it using Donald Knuth’s up-arrow notation. In this system, a single up-arrow denotes ordinary exponentiation: a \uparrow b = a^b. A double up-arrow represents tetration, or an iterated tower of exponents: 3 \uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3^{3^3} = 3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987. A triple up-arrow denotes iterated tetration: 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 corresponds to an exponential tower of threes that is 7,625,597,484,987 layers high. This value is already far too gigantic to write down directly, exceeding the total number of elementary particles in the observable universe (roughly 10^{80}). Four up-arrows, 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3, construct a number known as g_1. In g_1, the number of arrows in the intermediate operational steps dwarfs human comprehension. Yet, g_1 is only the foundation of the construction. Graham's number is built in 64 recursive stages: * * g_2 = 3 \uparrow^{g_1} 3 (where the number of arrows equals the value of g_1) * * This pattern continues iteratively such that g_{k} = 3 \uparrow^{g_{k-1}} 3. Graham's number is defined as G = g_{64}. The scale of G produces remarkable physical paradoxes. If every digit of Graham's number were printed in Planck-scale typography, the physical volume required would exceed the observable universe billions of times over. Even holding a full mental representation of every digit is physically impossible: the entropy and information density required to store that many bits would collapse a human brain into a supermassive black hole. Despite its incomprehensible size, Graham’s number has precise, known arithmetic properties. Because it is an immense tower of powers of three, its terminal decimal digits can be calculated using modular arithmetic. For instance, its final twelve digits are known to be ...262464195387. #fyp #edit #russia #ww2 #ussr

غدا يوم الجمعة ونحن اليوم في ليلة الجمعة .. #يوم_الجمعه #ليلة_الجمعة #صلوا_على_رسول_الله

Deem Thummarat

Open In TikTok:

Region: TH

Thursday 24 September 2026 08:18:44 GMT

Music

Download

Comments

วัตถุ ลึกลับ :

🥰🥰🥰

Yo :

😉😉😉

romelahadae :

👍👍👍

Adul Janae :

🔥

phimchanokprasoet :

😁😁😁

Other Videos

About

Legal