Cookiecookiemeowmeow69
Region: US
Friday 25 September 2026 10:49:29 GMT
41445
11807
97
951
Music
Download
Comments
ade :
gyjo with a side of diejoni man i love you
2026-09-26 00:16:23
327
D :
DIEJONI EXES YESSSSSS
2026-09-26 15:45:25
10
the dogtor :
Holy peak
2026-10-01 13:55:31
0
narancia :
Wait till they animate ts 🥹
2026-09-25 11:01:06
145
:
genuinely this is just so good the idea and the animation is crazy
2026-09-25 18:11:36
74
Jamie :
wait dio does the head down next to his horse like he does in Kansas City..
2026-10-01 19:18:43
0
megamind :
I've struck gold!!
2026-09-25 10:53:44
118
Cherry🌸🍉 :
I fw this so hard. Johnny and Diego are exes. No one can convince me otherwise.
2026-09-30 04:35:46
2
e.nygma :
never delete this
2026-10-01 15:51:25
0
i just need you back. :
MAKE THEM KISS AGAIN
2026-09-26 23:45:31
18
necropsyyy :
This is beautiful OMGGG
2026-09-25 15:08:54
16
Jamie :
revisitng and noticed Diego's teardrop
2026-09-30 17:43:37
3
♱⋆｡‧˚ʚ🌸ᴍᴀʀɪ🪽ɞ˚‧｡⋆♱ :
Wait.. lowkey👀...... i fw this so hard omg
2026-09-26 11:13:58
5
С меня хватит. †˙∘୧𝄞 :
acabo de hacer un fan fic de este video
2026-09-29 14:28:55
8
★†(Winchester !!) :
I need a fanfic like this
2026-09-27 22:03:53
7
ᴍᴀɴɢᴏ! 𓊆ྀི❤︎𓊇ྀི ᴀʙʙᴀᴄᴄʜɪᴏ's! :
THE KISS OMG
2026-09-26 02:27:11
8
TragicTangerine :
GyJo and DiJo?!!! yaaay 💖💖💖💖💖💖
2026-09-26 17:14:32
1
∅ :
thisis. so good . ohhmy god,,,,
2026-09-25 11:28:35
6
Limonada-delimon :
eso fue un beso?
2026-09-26 21:05:12
4
♡̶ ִ 𝓁𝗈𝗍𝗍𝗂𝖾ִ ֪ :
я заплакала
2026-09-26 22:28:45
1
yoohgart :
OH MYMGOFJSBSH PEAK PEAKKK
2026-09-25 17:45:02
3
I don’t care. :
Jack Stauber and steel ball run 😭😭
2026-09-25 22:49:46
4
Inuyasha #1 glazer :
THIS IS SO AMAZING OMGGG😭😭😭😭
2026-09-27 14:39:14
1
Juno😴 :
This is so good bruhhhh I love diegyjo 😋
2026-09-27 19:58:22
1
лосось :
2026-09-25 13:32:32
2
To see more videos from user @cookiecookiemeowmeow69, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Gta store misson modded gameplay online how to make 4 milion dollars easy Graham's number is a very large number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#fyp #edit #funny #capcut #fictional](/video/cover/7680422604028529950.webp)
