1. Home
  2. Detail

@7x.smf1: part56 || one of the best midfielder in somalia cadifatax'kuku legend in jubaland🔥||

7xftpl1🇧🇷
7xftpl1🇧🇷
Open In TikTok:
Region: SO
Saturday 26 September 2026 19:33:35 GMT
49732
6570
89
446

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.44MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.68MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.46MB) Music .mp3

Comments

elma_kafa21
ARͥAAͣNͫI 🏹21 :
Orodki camavinga iyo goaldhalinti Firmino😅
2026-09-26 20:36:19
254
abdullahi.rojo0
A.LONE :
kuku sxbky alla mxa twins uso wada dhelney sxbky
2026-09-27 00:40:09
17
updiasishuseinosman10
APDI AZIZ ©️ :
sterling before sterling 😳
2026-09-27 11:12:47
0
.2.3.1.7
L͢e͢ʜᴍᴀɳ🖤 :
maxa waye oradka nocana
2026-09-26 20:22:58
43
apdull86
APDUL⚡✅ :
prime starling😂🔥
2026-09-27 10:45:27
1
shucaybgudi4
Shucayb Gudi comando 🇸🇴 :
the legend
2026-09-27 08:12:27
0
updi.219
Updiwahap :
Sterling oo somali eh 😂
2026-09-26 21:36:20
0
updirizackedit
SCAR :
prime kuku fc twins 2016 kar kar waye🔥
2026-09-27 09:19:48
4
12.00.15
Prime×RK٭͜ :
raheem sterling oo somali😂💔
2026-09-26 21:05:07
2
6.8.0.26
️ :
Master kuku❤️
2026-09-26 20:34:04
1
53y.1
امين :
Dribbling like Sterling 🔥
2026-09-26 20:16:38
29
maroowe12345
○TTɛH ¹7 🇸🇴 :
Orodki Starling iyo Goal Dhlinti Firmino 😭😂
2026-09-26 23:10:01
5
shuvel_shoval19
Bakari Shuvale :
Kuku 🔥
2026-09-27 07:45:26
4
zaki.yaano16
R i c h 么 m a n :
prime Kuku 2016-2026 🔥😭😂
2026-09-26 21:08:04
7
johanfatax44
Abdifatax yare :
nin wayen kuku🤝guul my bro ✊
2026-09-27 10:50:34
1
27..21.2
M͢O⃡H͢A⃡M͢E⃡T͢H🌟 :
Hada Yarkan Xgu ku danbeyay.
2026-09-26 23:12:42
0
omaroww41
OMarrr⏳️😍✨️ :
CajiiiB🐐❤️
2026-09-26 20:23:15
3
fuckqabiil_42
A👾 :
Kuku🔥
2026-09-27 10:20:53
1
iamabdul84
Maliyoow 🇸🇴 :
kuku
2026-09-26 21:02:54
1
khaalid..40
Khaalid-87🤞⚽ :
Kuku 🐐❤️
2026-09-26 20:07:33
3
xushmadle04
JAAMAC"🤴🏼🇸🇱❤️ :
wuxuu ku tusaa inee kubada eheen orad badan ee thy maskaxx master KUKU🐐❤️🔥
2026-09-26 22:49:43
3
sharmakovic100
ɢɢ,ᴍᴀɴ💙 :
mizaanka culus kuku[Fire]
2026-09-26 20:47:26
2
mo.adke
الْقُرْآنQuran66 :
abdifatah kuku jubaland
2026-09-27 08:41:00
1
ayoupmaestro
Ayoup :
dadka twins so qoraayo ani KUKU. qamaar 60/60 baan islaso ciyarnee kwrn CITY BROTHERS asago uu ciyarayo What a legend Abdi fitaah kuku
2026-09-27 07:57:33
0
123456__108
YOW MAN🫅🏿❤️ :
kp Ahmed gurey miya😂
2026-09-26 22:04:47
1
To see more videos from user @7x.smf1, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

iPhone call ringtone! Copy the video link and download it from https://tiktokio.com/. #fyp #iphoneringtone #ringtone #nadadering #iphone #callringtone
iPhone call ringtone! Copy the video link and download it from https://tiktokio.com/. #fyp #iphoneringtone #ringtone #nadadering #iphone #callringtone
🪳
🪳
Brasileiros são bons Deus abençoe todos #brasil🇧🇷
Brasileiros são bons Deus abençoe todos #brasil🇧🇷
83% win rate sounds impressive… until you ask what that number actually represents. There’s nothing wrong with using indicators. There’s also nothing wrong with combining different tools to build a trading framework. The problem starts when a few clean historical examples are presented as proof of a repeatable edge. In this case, the “Absorption Bubbles” indicator is not showing true institutional positioning or directly observing who is buying and selling. It uses price and volume data to infer possible absorption. That distinction matters. Then another indicator is added to generate the actual buy and sell signals, and suddenly we’re looking at an advertised 83% win rate. But before I care about the win rate, I want to know: What’s the sample size? What are the exact rules? What do the losing trades look like? What’s the average win versus the average loss? How does it perform across different market conditions? And does the edge survive after realistic trading costs? Because an indicator can look incredible on selected charts. A strategy has to survive all the trades you don’t put in the content. And when the tool being demonstrated ultimately leads into a paid product, that makes independent verification even more important. I’m not saying the indicator doesn’t work. I’m saying marketing is not evidence of an edge. An indicator can be sold at scale. A genuine edge still has to be proven.
83% win rate sounds impressive… until you ask what that number actually represents. There’s nothing wrong with using indicators. There’s also nothing wrong with combining different tools to build a trading framework. The problem starts when a few clean historical examples are presented as proof of a repeatable edge. In this case, the “Absorption Bubbles” indicator is not showing true institutional positioning or directly observing who is buying and selling. It uses price and volume data to infer possible absorption. That distinction matters. Then another indicator is added to generate the actual buy and sell signals, and suddenly we’re looking at an advertised 83% win rate. But before I care about the win rate, I want to know: What’s the sample size? What are the exact rules? What do the losing trades look like? What’s the average win versus the average loss? How does it perform across different market conditions? And does the edge survive after realistic trading costs? Because an indicator can look incredible on selected charts. A strategy has to survive all the trades you don’t put in the content. And when the tool being demonstrated ultimately leads into a paid product, that makes independent verification even more important. I’m not saying the indicator doesn’t work. I’m saying marketing is not evidence of an edge. An indicator can be sold at scale. A genuine edge still has to be proven.




About

Legal