@pusameopalakaech: oh dear…

pusameopalakaech

Open In TikTok:

Region: GB

Sunday 27 September 2026 16:21:48 GMT

461896

121720

355

78458

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.1MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.1MB) Watermark .mp4 (0.12MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Iridescenz :

Nooo poor bebe

2026-09-27 18:01:23

5246

Boa_Pelato :

ⓘ 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘯.

2026-09-27 18:30:55

166

lil Blue Boy :

2026-09-27 16:26:01

1514

ELM :

I made a sticker

2026-09-28 02:02:16

481

-𝓛𝓾𝓴𝓪🤍- :

He broke thw 4th wall😭

2026-09-27 17:59:00

220

Emi :

ay dos tipos de personas jajaja

2026-09-27 18:45:12

716

Alyssa_2012 :

Are you okay?

2026-09-27 19:47:09

76

Caroline :

Omg hugs you😭🫂 don’t be sad❤️

2026-09-27 22:23:19

48

𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 :

let me just…

2026-09-28 16:38:17

58

Анасико :

come to me, I'll take pity on my little one 🥺

2026-09-27 16:58:17

55

israwraw :

noooo my bebe

2026-09-28 06:20:42

24

Heaven, that girl :

It’s OK, baby here come here I’ll hug you to make you happy

2026-10-13 05:16:27

0

Yesenia 😽 :

si no sana hoy, sanara mañana

2026-09-27 19:43:11

59

ary_sv✨ :

2026-09-27 19:28:15

29

Tổng tài girl ♊ :

có s ko bé đừng khóc cj thương

2026-09-30 11:13:35

0

𝙰𝚂𝙷𝙷in Parker🕸️🕷️ ^~^ :

2026-09-27 22:09:00

32

✨𝓝𝓮𝓵𝓵𝔂✨ :

2026-09-27 16:28:15

25

Laramei :

Achei que ele ia peidar e explodir dps de cair

2026-09-27 22:24:20

7

✧𝕾𝖙𝖊𝖕𝖍𝖆𝖓𝖞✧ :

for you

2026-09-27 22:19:15

5

SlipkCami𖣂 :

no lo vean para que no llore

2026-09-29 02:42:33

4

electron >< :

ơ ơ chị thương chị thương dậy nào

2026-09-29 10:11:41

1

『 V I P 』 :

2026-09-28 20:00:17

1

𝓒 :

come here

2026-09-28 22:10:07

3

Patooo🦆 :

😭😭😭noooooooooooo

2026-09-29 18:07:39

1

To see more videos from user @pusameopalakaech, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

@Miho #mihohouse #tiktokviral #trending #viral #xh

@Miho #mihohouse #tiktokviral #trending #viral #xh

#viladmirputin #viral_video #frpシ

#viladmirputin #viral_video #frpシ

#kesfetteyiz #kesfetteyiz

#kesfetteyiz #kesfetteyiz

ABC’s fuller reporting on Diego Sarabia’s gag-order request makes the defense argument more specific. His lawyers are not asking the judge to erase the case from public discussion. They are requesting what they call “narrowly tailored restrictions” preventing parties and attorneys from publicly arguing the merits outside court. They say the nonstop publicity could prejudice future jurors and contribute to threats, doxxing and intimidation. And frankly, the doxxing concern is not imaginary. Judge Phaedra Perry-Bond already sealed some filings after an unrelated Marine who shares a defendant’s name said he and his family received death threats. The judge condemned the resulting internet vigilantism as reckless and dangerous. That part should concern everyone. But here is where the argument gets interesting. Sarabia’s attorney James Knox says Jane Doe’s lawyer, Thomas Giuffra, has been “trying his case in the media” and presenting disputed allegations to the public before discovery and trial. Giuffra responds that the defense side has also been talking publicly, leaking confidential material and attacking Jane Doe’s claims. He says the gag-order request is an effort to silence him after those rebuttals gained traction. Those are competing allegations. The judge has not resolved them. So perhaps we can retire the fantasy that only one side discovered television. This case has become a full-blown public-relations war. Statements. Leaks. Interviews. Screenshots. Court filings. Internet detectives. Wrong-person doxxing. Threats. And thousands of strangers conducting jury deliberations from their couches before a civil jury has even been selected. A court has every right to protect the integrity of a future trial. But if speech is going to be restricted, the rule should be painfully simple: Same muzzle. Both sides. No selective silence. No “my interview is legal advocacy but yours is prejudicial publicity.” And one more thing: The judge has not granted this gag order. Sarabia asked. That is all. A motion is not a ruling, and filing the words “narrowly tailored” does not magically make every requested restriction constitutionally appropriate. Protect the jury pool. Stop the doxxing. Stop the threats. Then let the evidence do what everybody keeps claiming they want it to do: speak for itself. #cornell7 #janedoe #cornell #courtwatch #dueprocess

ABC’s fuller reporting on Diego Sarabia’s gag-order request makes the defense argument more specific. His lawyers are not asking the judge to erase the case from public discussion. They are requesting what they call “narrowly tailored restrictions” preventing parties and attorneys from publicly arguing the merits outside court. They say the nonstop publicity could prejudice future jurors and contribute to threats, doxxing and intimidation. And frankly, the doxxing concern is not imaginary. Judge Phaedra Perry-Bond already sealed some filings after an unrelated Marine who shares a defendant’s name said he and his family received death threats. The judge condemned the resulting internet vigilantism as reckless and dangerous. That part should concern everyone. But here is where the argument gets interesting. Sarabia’s attorney James Knox says Jane Doe’s lawyer, Thomas Giuffra, has been “trying his case in the media” and presenting disputed allegations to the public before discovery and trial. Giuffra responds that the defense side has also been talking publicly, leaking confidential material and attacking Jane Doe’s claims. He says the gag-order request is an effort to silence him after those rebuttals gained traction. Those are competing allegations. The judge has not resolved them. So perhaps we can retire the fantasy that only one side discovered television. This case has become a full-blown public-relations war. Statements. Leaks. Interviews. Screenshots. Court filings. Internet detectives. Wrong-person doxxing. Threats. And thousands of strangers conducting jury deliberations from their couches before a civil jury has even been selected. A court has every right to protect the integrity of a future trial. But if speech is going to be restricted, the rule should be painfully simple: Same muzzle. Both sides. No selective silence. No “my interview is legal advocacy but yours is prejudicial publicity.” And one more thing: The judge has not granted this gag order. Sarabia asked. That is all. A motion is not a ruling, and filing the words “narrowly tailored” does not magically make every requested restriction constitutionally appropriate. Protect the jury pool. Stop the doxxing. Stop the threats. Then let the evidence do what everybody keeps claiming they want it to do: speak for itself. #cornell7 #janedoe #cornell #courtwatch #dueprocess

draft

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy