Most pathologist are clapping back at the assertion because apparently it’s is extremely possible for it to happen and apparently kinda common. Past that as of now the most logical thing to me is drowning but absent of any other evidence what else could it be?
2026-09-27 18:40:47
1
MZ.O.E.S⭐NO,OPPS AROUND ME ✨ :
YOU SPEAKING FAXS PREACH
2026-09-27 18:37:04
0
Karen Deavers :
it's an easy, quick Google search to find that out .
2026-09-27 23:00:52
0
Ernest Hughes Jr. :
You cannot rule out drowning simply because obvious water wasn’t found in the lungs or stomach at autopsy. Lungs are spongy tissue containing tiny air sacs—they don’t have to fill up like balloons for someone to drown. Even a small amount of inhaled water can interfere with oxygen exchange.
Decomposition also makes the findings harder to interpret. That’s why pathologists consider the full examination and the circumstances together. That doesn’t establish exactly what happened, but “no water means no drowning” is not a medically sound conclusion.
2026-09-27 18:39:03
2
To see more videos from user @myalamis, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.