@tavelarocque: a little philosophy makes you an atheist. a lot of it brings you back to God. and the man who said it basically invented the scientific method. a little philosophy shows you the gears. a lot of it makes you ask who built the machine. #philosophy #faith #god #wisdom

Dillon :

This was me.

￴￴ ￴￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴￴ :

appeal to authority ✌️

"Just Laugh" :

well Nitszche knew a lot of philosophy

☧Jingwei :

I was a Nihilist Atheist for 10 years. I tried to "Disprove" God by using science and philosophy. This atheist book made me a devout Roman Catholic.

X :

humans are paradoxical which just (is)if you (be) then your (being) while (not being) at the same time…

tyriop7 :

god of the gaps basically

☨ Agera ☨ :

When you first begin studying philosophy you become wise enough to ask questions, but with more philosophy you can finally answer those questions.

Jasonnn🤘🎸 :

I agree, I was agnostic at 14 and now devout Christian.

human.gg :

a little philosophy can made you an atheist. A lot of it bring you back to the god.At absolute can made you turn back into atheist

IGetYou03 :

Yet all studies demonstrate the higher someone’s level of education, the more likely they are to be an atheist. And only 12-14% of philosophers are theist

☦️ :

beautiful

Xycore :

You are correct but it didn’t bring you back to the same god the god in religions aren’t real but there is a creator

Koffi :

It's just God of the Gaps. When you cannot find answers to questions, you fill it with God.

harrinus :

as soon as religion becomes collective and institutional it becomes corrupted as long as religion stays individual it becomes enlightening

nas :

Why ask who when we can ask what?

tishhockey :

high IQ post 🛐

Luther Wissa :

The flesh wants to run from God, it uses every excuse to take charge, whether it be philosophy science, religion relationships. Whatever it can to assert its dominance over the spirit.

kimanj :

And in philosophy this is called Appeal to Authority 🤣🤣🤣

Etsykage :

😂😂😂 no

. :

When you look closely at the deepest arguments for and against the existence of God, they consistently end in a philosophical stalemate. Neither side can definitively prove their fundamental definitions, which leaves the debate at an unresolvable standstill. Because of this intellectual tie, the most logical and probabilistic baseline is the null hypothesis: you do not assume a massive, unproven entity exists until the burden of proof is explicitly met. Therefore, I take the position of a pragmatic, agnostic atheist. While I acknowledge the intellectual stalemate, the most rational way to actually live and navigate reality is to proceed as if God does not exist, without adding unnecessary metaphysical layers to the universe.

bilal :

dreww🥱🥱 :

Rud Recanati222 :

☦ESPITI☦ :

Amen

Malek :

Kierkegaard also waa along the same lines