@awaisnasir222: #CapCut

❣️N❣️S❣️🇦🇪✈️🇵🇰

Open In TikTok:

Region: PK

Monday 28 September 2026 17:28:50 GMT

23621

1627

19

427

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.71MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.52MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.42MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Aleena Arshad :

AMEEEEEEN SUMA AMEEEEEEN 🤲♥️

2026-10-10 05:45:28

1

My Life Line😘My Hubby 😘AHSAN :

Ameen Sum Ameen 🤲

2026-09-29 07:31:13

1

it's Dua 🫀 :

ameen

2026-09-30 00:24:43

1

ɱҽɾι ԃυɳιყα ραɾαԃҽʂ ɱα :

sum ameen

2026-09-29 10:49:57

1

Dogar Saab :

Ameen Suma Ameen Suma Ameen Suma Ameen Suma 🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲

2026-09-30 04:32:47

0

Javeed Asif :

Ameen

2026-10-06 17:40:09

0

Sonni kuri 750🇵🇰🫂🇦🇪 :

2026-09-29 00:11:42

1

Muhammad💞 :

ameen

2026-10-07 17:51:51

0

انتظار :

ameen

2026-10-05 03:35:30

0

Saba Saba :

ameen

2026-09-29 18:14:53

0

nawdar Hussain :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-10-03 15:50:31

1

ch ahسan 302 :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-09-29 09:01:45

1

M Rashid :

😳😳😳😳

2026-09-28 17:42:54

1

ch Noor Ahmed :

❤️❤️❤️

2026-09-28 17:44:21

1

N 🥰S🥰A🥰 :

🥺🥺🥺

2026-09-28 17:31:11

1

دبئی والے 🇦🇪 :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-09-29 19:19:14

0

💜.Hijab Queen.💙 :

🥺🥺🥺

2026-09-28 20:01:50

1

arham Ali ch :

[Heartwarming][Heartwarming][Heartwarming]

2026-09-28 17:35:46

1

nawdar Hussain :

♥️♥️♥️

2026-10-03 15:50:29

1

To see more videos from user @awaisnasir222, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

TRUMP WANTS UKRAINE TO REPLACE ZELENSKYY. BUT WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE UKRAINE’S PRESIDENT? Donald Trump has escalated his confrontation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, openly declaring that Ukraine needs a new leader who can reach a deal to end the war with Russia. The timing is significant. His remarks came just one day after announcing a diesel supply agreement with Vladimir Putin, while tensions over Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil infrastructure continued to grow. But this is no longer just a disagreement between two presidents. It raises a fundamental question about national sovereignty: Can a foreign leader pressure a country to change its leadership because he disagrees with its wartime decisions? WHY IS TRUMP TURNING AGAINST ZELENSKYY? Trump argues that Zelenskyy has failed to reach a peace agreement and that Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil facilities are contributing to high diesel prices. The political context matters. American consumers are facing fuel-price pressure ahead of the November midterm elections, and the Trump administration has an incentive to demonstrate that it can bring costs down. Trump’s proposed Russian diesel deal is intended to increase supplies. Critics, however, argue that easing restrictions on Russian energy exports risks providing Moscow with additional revenue while its invasion of Ukraine continues. ZELENSKYY’S RESPONSE: UKRAINIANS WILL DECIDE Ukraine’s foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, defended Zelenskyy and stressed that Ukrainians have the right to choose their own president. Zelenskyy has also offered a direct response to criticism over elections. On October 11, he said Ukraine could organize elections if Russia agreed to a 60-day complete ceasefire, giving the country a period in which voting could be organized under safer conditions. This matters because holding elections during an active war presents serious practical and legal challenges. Martial law, the safety of voters, displaced citizens, military personnel and people living under Russian occupation all complicate the process. An election must be more than a vote on paper. It must be sufficiently safe, inclusive and credible to reflect the will of the Ukrainian people. WHO BENEFITS FROM THIS DIVIDE? Moscow has welcomed Trump’s call for new Ukrainian leadership. That is hardly surprising: weakening the relationship between Kyiv and Washington could reduce Ukraine’s diplomatic leverage and complicate its access to continued American support. Yet the situation is more complicated than simply declaring Trump an ally of Putin. Washington may be pursuing a transactional strategy focused on energy prices and a negotiated settlement, while Ukraine prioritizes its security and territorial sovereignty. The question is whether that strategy produces a sustainable peace or shifts pressure disproportionately onto the country that was invaded. THE BIGGER PRINCIPLE There is nothing inherently wrong with urging a wartime leader to negotiate. Diplomacy requires compromise, and no government should be immune from criticism. But there is a crucial difference between advocating negotiations and suggesting that another country should replace its president because its current leader will not accept the preferred terms of a foreign power. Ukraine’s leadership must ultimately derive its legitimacy from Ukrainians, not from Washington or Moscow. A genuine peace agreement must address security guarantees, the future of occupied territories, the protection of civilians and the risk of another invasion. Replacing one leader does not automatically resolve any of these questions. The real test of Trump’s diplomacy is not whether Zelenskyy agrees to his demands. It is whether any agreement can protect Ukraine’s sovereignty, stop the killing and prevent another war. PEACE SHOULD BE NEGOTIATED BY DIPLOMACY, NOT IMPOSED THROUGH POLITICAL INTIMIDATION.

TRUMP WANTS UKRAINE TO REPLACE ZELENSKYY. BUT WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE UKRAINE’S PRESIDENT? Donald Trump has escalated his confrontation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, openly declaring that Ukraine needs a new leader who can reach a deal to end the war with Russia. The timing is significant. His remarks came just one day after announcing a diesel supply agreement with Vladimir Putin, while tensions over Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil infrastructure continued to grow. But this is no longer just a disagreement between two presidents. It raises a fundamental question about national sovereignty: Can a foreign leader pressure a country to change its leadership because he disagrees with its wartime decisions? WHY IS TRUMP TURNING AGAINST ZELENSKYY? Trump argues that Zelenskyy has failed to reach a peace agreement and that Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil facilities are contributing to high diesel prices. The political context matters. American consumers are facing fuel-price pressure ahead of the November midterm elections, and the Trump administration has an incentive to demonstrate that it can bring costs down. Trump’s proposed Russian diesel deal is intended to increase supplies. Critics, however, argue that easing restrictions on Russian energy exports risks providing Moscow with additional revenue while its invasion of Ukraine continues. ZELENSKYY’S RESPONSE: UKRAINIANS WILL DECIDE Ukraine’s foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, defended Zelenskyy and stressed that Ukrainians have the right to choose their own president. Zelenskyy has also offered a direct response to criticism over elections. On October 11, he said Ukraine could organize elections if Russia agreed to a 60-day complete ceasefire, giving the country a period in which voting could be organized under safer conditions. This matters because holding elections during an active war presents serious practical and legal challenges. Martial law, the safety of voters, displaced citizens, military personnel and people living under Russian occupation all complicate the process. An election must be more than a vote on paper. It must be sufficiently safe, inclusive and credible to reflect the will of the Ukrainian people. WHO BENEFITS FROM THIS DIVIDE? Moscow has welcomed Trump’s call for new Ukrainian leadership. That is hardly surprising: weakening the relationship between Kyiv and Washington could reduce Ukraine’s diplomatic leverage and complicate its access to continued American support. Yet the situation is more complicated than simply declaring Trump an ally of Putin. Washington may be pursuing a transactional strategy focused on energy prices and a negotiated settlement, while Ukraine prioritizes its security and territorial sovereignty. The question is whether that strategy produces a sustainable peace or shifts pressure disproportionately onto the country that was invaded. THE BIGGER PRINCIPLE There is nothing inherently wrong with urging a wartime leader to negotiate. Diplomacy requires compromise, and no government should be immune from criticism. But there is a crucial difference between advocating negotiations and suggesting that another country should replace its president because its current leader will not accept the preferred terms of a foreign power. Ukraine’s leadership must ultimately derive its legitimacy from Ukrainians, not from Washington or Moscow. A genuine peace agreement must address security guarantees, the future of occupied territories, the protection of civilians and the risk of another invasion. Replacing one leader does not automatically resolve any of these questions. The real test of Trump’s diplomacy is not whether Zelenskyy agrees to his demands. It is whether any agreement can protect Ukraine’s sovereignty, stop the killing and prevent another war. PEACE SHOULD BE NEGOTIATED BY DIPLOMACY, NOT IMPOSED THROUGH POLITICAL INTIMIDATION.

Réponse à @Tifanm mizé a

Réponse à @Tifanm mizé a

We thank god…. Sauna got us dying lol #kanebrown #blessed #getfit45 #chicago

We thank god…. Sauna got us dying lol #kanebrown #blessed #getfit45 #chicago

Saber X Rider , Part-1!! #fatestaynight #fateseries #fategrandorder #saber #rider

Saber X Rider , Part-1!! #fatestaynight #fateseries #fategrandorder #saber #rider

Notre dessin animé génération#enfant #dessinanime #nianancoulplot #animation3d #ernestetrebecca #amitiés #film

Notre dessin animé génération#enfant #dessinanime #nianancoulplot #animation3d #ernestetrebecca #amitiés #film

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy