@charles.duhigg: To change someone's mind, you have to find the value underneath their position. A Wisconsin jury was split over a man named Leroy Reed, and one juror, John Boly, stopped arguing and started asking. The last holdout cared about public safety. Once Boly framed acquittal around that, every juror voted not guilty.
why the jurors changed their minds is his interpretation, not something the evidence proves. The story is real; the psychological lesson is more debatable.
2026-09-28 19:41:00
9
Diandra Jones :
I love this story in the book
2026-09-29 12:14:42
0
Quazimotto :
Ty for this.
2026-10-27 05:38:47
0
David Perell :
interesting what about in online messaging
2026-10-12 12:15:06
0
cls1227 :
This is what we do in sales 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
2026-09-28 18:19:54
2
The Virtual CEO :
Such a good reminder that people often respond better when you understand what matters to them, not just what they believe.
2026-09-29 01:08:08
0
Bloke :
Yeah my boss is a narcissistic nut. Nothing works, I mean nothing.
2026-10-27 09:16:27
0
Domajo8 :
I mean this sounds like a typical male thing. Maybe the goal isn't to change people's minds this sounds manipulative
2026-09-28 21:47:53
1
Scarlett & Sherlock :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-09-28 19:25:07
1
Christopher Espadas :
😎😎😎
2026-10-09 09:35:43
0
bobby :
The jurors got it wrong and broke their oath. Jurors swear to apply the law as the judge gives it, and everyone agreed Reed met every element: he was a felon, he possessed a gun, and he knew it. Even the defense conceded he was technically guilty on all three counts. The jury didn't find a gap in the evidence; it simply decided it didn't like the result. That is twelve unelected people overriding a law passed by a legislature, in a case where the judge had explicitly refused to give them that power.
2026-10-01 01:44:07
0
To see more videos from user @charles.duhigg, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.