@monakhabi: ✦ 𝐔𝐬𝐞 𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 🎧 ╰┈➤ 𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐠 🫀 #rifatmridhayt #trendegmusic #lofimusic #use_headphones🎧

মনা🤭

Open In TikTok:

Region: BD

Tuesday 29 September 2026 04:13:34 GMT

129339

607

10

7

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.73MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.61MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

MASRAFI :

hi

2026-09-30 06:03:02

0

SkA rfat :

2026-09-30 08:11:32

0

Raton Biswas :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-09-30 11:28:18

0

myLife :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-09-30 03:33:00

0

Md Hamim :

🥰

2026-09-30 03:27:44

0

only Herun 40 :

😂😂😂

2026-09-30 02:57:25

0

🧑‍🎓 পুতুল 🧑‍🎓 আর সুমি :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-09-30 02:52:23

0

কাউছার❤️❤️ :

😅😅🥰🥰🥰🥰

2026-09-30 01:51:21

0

খুলনার ছেলে কিং ড্রাইভার :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-09-29 04:20:28

0

Lx sojun vai :

[Heartwarming][Heartwarming][Heartwarming]

2026-09-30 12:58:24

0

To see more videos from user @monakhabi, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Опять эти слайдшоу #cs2 #donk #тимспирит #teamspirit #донк #edit

Опять эти слайдшоу #cs2 #donk #тимспирит #teamspirit #донк #edit

#سۆران_كۆیە_دەهۆک_ڕانیه_کەرکوک_هەڵەبجە #ئەکتیڤبن🥀🖤ـہہـ٨ــہ #foryou #foryoupage #tiktok

#سۆران_كۆیە_دەهۆک_ڕانیه_کەرکوک_هەڵەبجە #ئەکتیڤبن🥀🖤ـہہـ٨ــہ #foryou #foryoupage #tiktok

Aloo Ke Paad Se Nikle Heere Part 1 💎💨 Aloo ke paad se achanak chamakte heere nikal gaye! 💎💨 Aloo khushi se unhein bazaar bechne gaya, par wahan Karela ko shak ho gaya. 🕵️‍♂️ Phir Aloo ne ghar aake dobara paad mara, jise Baigan, Tamatar aur Pyaaz ne apni aankhon se dekh liya! 👀💥 Ab Baigan ne ameer banne ke liye Aloo ko kidnap kar liya hai! 😱 Part 2 ke liye FOLLOW aur COMMENT karein! 👇📈 #aloobaigan #3danimation #cartoondrama #aianimation #funnyanimation

Aloo Ke Paad Se Nikle Heere Part 1 💎💨 Aloo ke paad se achanak chamakte heere nikal gaye! 💎💨 Aloo khushi se unhein bazaar bechne gaya, par wahan Karela ko shak ho gaya. 🕵️‍♂️ Phir Aloo ne ghar aake dobara paad mara, jise Baigan, Tamatar aur Pyaaz ne apni aankhon se dekh liya! 👀💥 Ab Baigan ne ameer banne ke liye Aloo ko kidnap kar liya hai! 😱 Part 2 ke liye FOLLOW aur COMMENT karein! 👇📈 #aloobaigan #3danimation #cartoondrama #aianimation #funnyanimation

#احبك #اكسبلورexplore #خواطر #السعودية_الكويت_مصر_العراق_لبنان #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂

#احبك #اكسبلورexplore #خواطر #السعودية_الكويت_مصر_العراق_لبنان #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂

During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on September 29, 2026, former Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith defended his past federal criminal investigations into Donald Trump against Republican backlash. The congressional appearance featured multiple exchanges, including one moment where Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) delivered a personal insult, telling the former prosecutor, “You make me want to throw up in my mouth.” The partisan divide underscored the political friction surrounding the dropped federal cases, which were dismissed following Trump's victory in the 2024 presidential election in accordance with DOJ guidelines against prosecuting a sitting president. The primary catalyst for the fiery confrontation with Kennedy was that Smith’s office had obtained the phone toll records—such as call logs and timestamps—of several Republican members of Congress during his probe into the events of January 6. Senator Kennedy aggressively accused Smith of unlawful overreach, arguing that the special counsel bypassed constitutional checks and balances by requesting court-approved non-disclosure orders without explicitly alerting Chief Judge James Boasberg that the targets were sitting lawmakers. From Kennedy's perspective, this lack of specific disclosure unconstitutionally infringed upon the separation of powers and shielded the sweeping executive branch subpoenas from proper judicial scrutiny. During this specific confrontation, Kennedy did not allow Smith to explain himself, cutting him off mid-sentence to deliver his insult and immediately yielding his remaining time. Despite being silenced during that exchange, Smith and his defenders maintain that his team adhered strictly to standard federal legal procedures that routinely happen in major investigations. They emphasize that seeking non-disclosure orders is a routine safety measure to prevent witness tampering or the destruction of evidence, and that Chief Judge Boasberg legally signed off on the orders without raising any issues at the time. Because targeting third-party telecom logs under sealed court order has a long, established history in federal law enforcement, supporters contend the process was entirely lawful and properly authorized by the court. Ultimately, it seems that a primary driver of the anger from Republican lawmakers is that the investigation targeted Republican members of Congress. Conservative lawmakers claim that the collection of congressional phone records crossed a boundary, with Kennedy’s argument fundamentally based on the premise that elected officials should receive special constitutional protections and treatment not equal to the general public. Conversely, for Smith and his defenders, it was simply a standard federal procedure commonly used and applied evenly to an investigation, arguing that the records were gathered purely because those specific lawmakers happened to be in close communication with Donald Trump around the events of January 6. The reviewing judge ultimately signed off on the commonly used practice and procedure, and did not question its validity. Also, the idea that the Constitution shields lawmakers' telecom logs from routine, standard federal investigation is a specific legal theory—not an explicit written fact.

During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on September 29, 2026, former Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith defended his past federal criminal investigations into Donald Trump against Republican backlash. The congressional appearance featured multiple exchanges, including one moment where Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) delivered a personal insult, telling the former prosecutor, “You make me want to throw up in my mouth.” The partisan divide underscored the political friction surrounding the dropped federal cases, which were dismissed following Trump's victory in the 2024 presidential election in accordance with DOJ guidelines against prosecuting a sitting president. The primary catalyst for the fiery confrontation with Kennedy was that Smith’s office had obtained the phone toll records—such as call logs and timestamps—of several Republican members of Congress during his probe into the events of January 6. Senator Kennedy aggressively accused Smith of unlawful overreach, arguing that the special counsel bypassed constitutional checks and balances by requesting court-approved non-disclosure orders without explicitly alerting Chief Judge James Boasberg that the targets were sitting lawmakers. From Kennedy's perspective, this lack of specific disclosure unconstitutionally infringed upon the separation of powers and shielded the sweeping executive branch subpoenas from proper judicial scrutiny. During this specific confrontation, Kennedy did not allow Smith to explain himself, cutting him off mid-sentence to deliver his insult and immediately yielding his remaining time. Despite being silenced during that exchange, Smith and his defenders maintain that his team adhered strictly to standard federal legal procedures that routinely happen in major investigations. They emphasize that seeking non-disclosure orders is a routine safety measure to prevent witness tampering or the destruction of evidence, and that Chief Judge Boasberg legally signed off on the orders without raising any issues at the time. Because targeting third-party telecom logs under sealed court order has a long, established history in federal law enforcement, supporters contend the process was entirely lawful and properly authorized by the court. Ultimately, it seems that a primary driver of the anger from Republican lawmakers is that the investigation targeted Republican members of Congress. Conservative lawmakers claim that the collection of congressional phone records crossed a boundary, with Kennedy’s argument fundamentally based on the premise that elected officials should receive special constitutional protections and treatment not equal to the general public. Conversely, for Smith and his defenders, it was simply a standard federal procedure commonly used and applied evenly to an investigation, arguing that the records were gathered purely because those specific lawmakers happened to be in close communication with Donald Trump around the events of January 6. The reviewing judge ultimately signed off on the commonly used practice and procedure, and did not question its validity. Also, the idea that the Constitution shields lawmakers' telecom logs from routine, standard federal investigation is a specific legal theory—not an explicit written fact.

#account #acc #kurdistan #qaladze #foryou

#account #acc #kurdistan #qaladze #foryou

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy