@wbztv: Lindsay Clancy returned to court Tuesday for the first time since her murder trial ended in a mistrial. Her attorney, Kevin Reddington, turned heads when he filed a motion to get her case thrown out, questioning if anyone actually heard her admit to killing her three children. During the trial, he stated that she killed her kids during a state of postpartum psychosis. How will this affect Reddington’s strategy if the district attorney chooses to retry her? #massachusetts #clancy #trial #postpartum #mother

Mason Hendy :

1000000% and now they’re trying to go back on it🤡🤡🤡

Meda Rose :

I’ve said from day one she’s never admitted it

Patrick Hernandez :

Dr. Kirk Heilbrun (03:34:23): day19 There was. One of the things that she said when asked about what happened is that in the course of strangling each child, she said, "Go to God, baby. Go to God." And that was part of her expectation that she and the children would be together in heaven with God

ChrissyLynn :

Massachusetts (I live right down the street from the courthouse ) and Judge Sullivan have failed the justice system. I do not believe in justice anymore. There is reasonable doubt.😢 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 "BIG RED" did a great job today🙌🏽

LR :

YES SHE DID SAY THAT

pearl🇯🇲🇨🇦 :

lawyers are such snakes lol

spfprotective :

Thus/He was denied the bifurcation which means he was forced to argue one defense when really there are 2 questions needing to be answered and it's too confusing to argue both

Regis Simões 🇵🇹 :

The truth always finds its way out. Congratulations, Red—you are an extraordinary lawyer. Justice must go after the person who actually did this to that beautiful woman and your children.

383838839gr6g8 :

She did lol

brocktonboxer2 :

The Lindsay Clancy case is proof that democracy doesn't work. Massachusetts needs to bring back capital punishment.

boribori92 :

he's walking on dangerous grounds and playing chess

me :

the only way his response and strategy in court would be "confusing" is if you don't understand how criminal court works

amzleeziggy🇺🇸 :

Yes in the civil case and that should be admissible to the next go around

cojones6565 :

Yes; as is common her lawyer spoke on her behalf.

Coconut-117 :

😭bro they realized that , people will defend a murderer so now he's just going back on his argument

Jacob Willis :

If her lawyer was arguing the point that she was insane when she did it they never said she didn’t do it that’s them taking a legal stance that she did it so there really shouldn’t be any basis for them to all the sudden be like well they can’t actually prove it.

Colton Kelly :

but why wasnt that the first argument they made?

henok_j0 :

😭I hope he changes his defense if he actually believes there’s no evidence she did it.

moonrise baby doll :

“more or less admitted”!?!??

ladyluck1562 :

In the court room

Vola :

Arrest the judge. Immediately.

Ryan :

yes

Yume 💕 :

Mrs P :

Redington wanted to play clever and play cat and mouse

Jtyyy :

No