I thought it was because it was a 64 bit game about blocks so he just made the stacks 64 to reference that.
2026-10-01 15:00:55
2
Not Logssac :
64 sounds good anyways, very popular number and way better than over 100
2026-10-01 11:24:10
203
Boros🔻 :
Ancient ass factorio footage 😭😭😭
2026-10-02 10:50:24
1
just_joshin_you :
Bro couldn’t use 128😭
2026-10-01 10:20:49
253
breeeeeh :
why not 4,294,967,296
2026-10-02 12:27:19
10
73 dylan ZX :
it was because he didn’t know how to code higher than 64
2026-10-02 02:07:52
1
Lio Morata :
Why not 128, why not 256, why not 1024, and so on
2026-10-02 01:01:19
7
unfunnyjory :
people did NOT think it was hardware limitations 😭😭⁉️⁉️⁉️we're talking about 2010 here, not 1995
2026-10-01 11:14:55
2
Dough_monkeh :
I love 64 instead of 100 it just looks better
2026-10-02 02:43:37
10
Lil Cracka ❦ඩා୧⌓̈⃝୨🍾 :
it was 64 for hardware reasons but they kept it bc it was easier
2026-09-30 23:36:24
569
ULTRA_EDITZ :
it also taught us a bit of math
2026-10-01 01:38:27
34
November 2026🗿🍷 :
What about numbers like 144 it can also be split in half like 144/2=72/2=36/2=18/2=9/3=3/3=1 just had an option to divide by three
2026-10-01 00:14:34
82
Vahagen :
So why not 1024 items per stack?
2026-10-01 05:14:16
9
🪙🪙🍎🪙🐸Gamegenix99🍎🪙🐸🪙 :
also because it is the most memorable thing in gaming I cant remember the stack size in any other game however il always know Minecrafts is 64 its in everyone's brains
2026-10-01 06:42:06
6
DYLAN_kyg :
nah its because we not from 63
2026-10-01 01:51:10
9
H4m_BD :
80 crying in the corner
2026-10-02 12:33:18
1
~𝘴𝘪𝘸𝘸𝘺~ᵘⁿᵈᵉʳˢᶜᵒʳᵉˢ’ ʳᵉᵐⁱˣ :
Why not 2048
2026-10-02 00:02:51
0
GalaxyS24+HYPE :
why not infinite?
2026-10-02 07:41:55
0
Blackjawz1107 :
Could of done 640
2026-10-02 07:48:43
0
bob :
why not 164
2026-10-02 08:28:15
0
lou_chat :
128 is good
2026-10-01 23:25:00
2
🐜⬜white warrior ant⬜🐜 :
why not 128
2026-10-02 04:26:35
0
To see more videos from user @craftlore62, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.