@the.legal.np: So what does this mean in layman’s terms? Reddington asked Judge Sullivan to enter a not guilty finding, arguing that the prosecution hadn’t presented enough evidence to prove Lindsay committed the killings or was criminally responsible. The judge denied that request. He found that the evidence, viewed in the prosecution’s favor—as required for this motion—was enough for a reasonable jury to find both beyond a reasonable doubt. He also addressed her mental health: both sides presented testimony that she had a serious mental illness. But whether that illness made her legally not criminally responsible remained a question for the jury, especially because the experts disagreed. This ruling is not a guilty verdict. It means the judge rejected the argument that the evidence was legally insufficient and declined to end the murder case with a not guilty finding. #lindsayclancy

The Legal NP

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Thursday 01 October 2026 21:37:06 GMT