𐙚 𝐬𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐡 🧁 :
I researched the Jane Doe case at Cornell University. In 2024, she made a public statement saying that she was, willingly, intoxicated and agreed to some sexual acts but claimed to remember saying no to a foursome. Of course, the public won't hear alot from anybody at all and will receive limited information. Those who continued to persuade her to take ketamine while already drugged and continued to engage in more non-consenual sexual acts were expelled from Cornell university - 2 of the students. Those who encouraged others to join in by sending messages to others were suspended for a minimum of 2 semesters, also 2 students. And another 2 students were found not guilty and were not proven to be involved in any kind of non-consenual acts. Due to the New York penal code, they cannot be charged for all the acts as Jane Doe admitted to willingly taking ketamine, meaning she was able to consent under their law. She continued to take ketamine in order to force herself to pass out, the men to have sex with her and get them charged for rape. The reason the men cannot truly be charged is due to the penal code, which is decided by the New York State Legislature, which is a group of elected deciders of laws and rules. 140-144/213 of these are democrats. What those men did was morally wrong, however because of the democrats and their hold of New York since 2019, it was legally okay. She also claimed to one of the men she has now accused of sexual assault that none of the sexual acts were illegal after the man apologised and said they were too drunk and intoxicated to help the situation before it got too far. I'm not excusing what happened, I'm saying it needs alot more evidence.
2026-10-02 12:19:20