FotMob
Region: GB
Friday 02 October 2026 15:22:56 GMT
63610
12409
102
697
Music
Download
Comments
𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗚𝗔𝗡 🇩🇯 :
best center back in football history
2026-10-02 16:00:53
584
BTB :
36 and still the best cb itw 😭
2026-10-02 17:12:52
248
Ismacil_LFC❤️🦁 :
captain virgil van dijk 🧱🔥🐐
2026-10-02 17:28:16
36
LAGUTTA :
greatest defender still standing
2026-10-02 15:30:42
92
KvarA⁷⁷ :
my captain
2026-10-02 15:27:10
165
azan _1135 :
36 and the most reliable cb
2026-10-02 19:38:47
23
Ibo🐅 :
Best CB prime of all time btw
2026-10-02 15:30:49
326
Jackyboi37 :
The best cb oat
2026-10-03 00:15:35
8
JE :
Overhated rn
2026-10-02 15:28:02
18
𝓕𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓸🐦🔥 :
World best
2026-10-03 05:20:53
0
Otavio 🇯🇲❤️ :
BiG VirGil 🧱💥
2026-10-02 16:39:06
13
george :
maguire clears
2026-10-02 15:27:21
12
Just a user :
goat and mini goat
2026-10-02 19:52:58
12
Offx!äl🎭Djtîr♤ :
jacquet brought back the groove in him
2026-10-02 20:51:25
5
abdizo :
no one can stop him vvd❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
2026-10-03 05:49:51
0
O'mar Vibe's :
stay safe
2026-10-03 04:02:16
0
yngg clb 🍀🍀🍀🍀🌿 :
I think he's the best CB so far
2026-10-02 21:17:30
5
👑Mo Salah🇪🇬 :
2026-10-02 15:29:50
8
R_T🚩 :
best captain right now 🔥
2026-10-02 16:44:55
12
Ruch :
i know some guy named Keith mason gonna say vvd is the goat
2026-10-02 17:46:12
7
Ludvik_HG⚽️🙏 :
Helping a small creator
2026-10-02 15:27:38
9
Laderka_garoowe✌️🇸🇴🇸🇱 :
virgal vdd <<
2026-10-02 15:50:08
0
Hilary 💫 :
Virgil Van Dijk Is The Greatest CB of all time in the footballing world 🔥🔥🔥🔥
2026-10-02 23:25:04
3
pim the destroyer :
1 goal
2026-10-02 15:41:38
0
Edsmond trends ✅ :
Wait fr? My solid rock btw 🥰
2026-10-02 20:30:36
1
To see more videos from user @fotmobapp, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc⋅⋅⋅, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g64,[2] wheregn={3↑↑↑↑3,if n=1 and3↑gn−13,if n≥2. Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid#fypシ #trending #creatorsearchinsights #viral #keşfetbeniöneçıkar @AHMET-İSLAM PASHA @Enverist-pasha ☪ @E7V @𝓢𝓱𝓲𝓻𝔭🇦🇿🇮🇹 @𝐇𝟗𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐧](/video/cover/7672441726782541064.webp)
