The Law Says What?!
Region: US
Friday 02 October 2026 19:17:05 GMT
262634
22443
1207
1072
Music
Download
Comments
Cage :
calling it a loophole is weird. it literally just says your responsible for your own actions. I don't think that would be considered a loophole
2026-10-02 20:19:35
1768
followthepyro :
seems less like a loophole and more like reasonable law
2026-10-02 19:36:36
1144
JoJo :
I hate our laws.
2026-10-02 19:20:34
525
BN :
yes. If you choose to intoxicate yourself you are responsible for your decisions in that state. this isn't a loophole. this is just.. how the world works
2026-10-02 21:02:36
251
RT :
Why do we hold drunk drivers responsible for killing others in car accidents if “being too intoxicated” means you’re somehow not responsible for your actions? Calling this law a loophole implies that something is wrong with the current law, but I think it’s just consistent with the idea that you’re still responsible for your choices when intoxicated.
2026-10-04 10:00:32
2
youknowthething :
why is a law controversial or a loophole just because it creates personal accountability
2026-10-02 20:10:23
386
My Wife’s Husband :
What if both parties are heavily intoxicated?
2026-10-02 19:50:52
1007
Benrichards :
Law makes sense to me
2026-10-02 20:44:28
240
marco262 :
What distinguishes a loophole from a carved out exception in the law? Is it intention? Do we know this was an unintended interpretation?
2026-10-04 11:06:49
0
Atom_Alchemist :
I would not call that a loophole, as it's a specific written out exemption. a loophole would something unintentional.
2026-10-02 19:21:01
2473
Bulk Lord :
a loophole or just sensible law
2026-10-02 23:00:28
38
Nathan :
So essentially you are held accountable for your actions when you choose to get drunk just like in literally any other scenario
2026-10-02 23:56:53
72
shauna shipman’s lawyer :
This isn’t really a loophole, it’s a logical protection under the law.
2026-10-03 04:18:40
92
Vlad :
That’s not a loophole. That’s normal. If you chose to do drugs you chose the consequences of what happens after
2026-10-02 23:23:16
35
FuckTikTok :
That should be the law everywhere. Don’t ingest substances if you can’t handle them.
2026-10-03 04:51:57
10
Michael Fletcher :
it's a good law, it doesn't stop assault charges if the person doesn't consent or is unable to consent because they're unconscious. it would be ridiculous to say a person can't consent to intimacy the second they have any alcohol.
2026-10-02 22:21:50
9
Bluff Country Overland :
There is noting controversial about this. Nor is it a loophole. It’s intentionally written that way
2026-10-02 22:50:38
66
W :
It’s not a loop hole it is reality if you willingly create conditions where you increase the odds of yourself being a target then you partially share the responsibility if in the future you do become as a target.
2026-10-03 10:35:22
12
John :
The point of this law, which isn’t a loophole as it is stated in plain language, is because often times both parties have been drinking or doing recreational drugs, so if you claim intoxication removes one’s ability to consent, then inversely it removes one’s ability to determine the other person can’t consent!
2026-10-02 21:02:42
70
Fisherma2020 :
Without this “loophole” all drunk sex would be 🍇
2026-10-02 21:06:45
229
notadrian1244 :
loophole is when law isn’t in my favor
2026-10-03 00:45:01
12
wikidtree369 :
I was charged with batery when I was blackout drunk because the courts knew is was my choices that led to me going crazy. getting wasted is a choice and whatever happens is on you.
2026-10-02 20:39:59
20
Nope :
ah, the accountability loophole
2026-10-02 20:41:34
30
Vero :
That is INSANE!!! So this “loophole” protects predators! A man’s law! So shameful.
2026-10-02 19:28:30
414
Patrick :
If you don't trust your decision making when on drugs and/or alcohol, don't do them.
2026-10-03 03:56:33
32
To see more videos from user @the.law.says.what, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
