1. Home
  2. Detail

@gullala290:

Gulala grail fish
Gulala grail fish
Open In TikTok:
Region: PK
Saturday 03 October 2026 10:21:46 GMT
189
36
6
0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.63MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (2.63MB) Watermark .mp4 (4.95MB) Music .mp3

Comments

s018123
sadik Khan King :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-10-20 16:42:35
0
user491002151
Adil khan :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-10-03 15:52:45
0
user14868303
🥀saeed ❤️ Ahmad ❤️‍🩹A ❣️S :
😳😳😳
2026-10-03 14:07:33
0
hurrair_khaan804
ᴵᴬᴹ➳Ꮋน𝑟𝑟𝗮ⅈṛ"𝕜ⲏᾰŊ➳ :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-10-03 13:18:41
0
dangerahmadjan302
DangerAhmadjan302 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-10-03 13:06:07
0
s018123
sadik Khan King :
🖤🖤🖤
2026-10-20 16:42:38
0
To see more videos from user @gullala290, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

⚔️🔥 حمزه سرحان.. شبل الصعيد في ميدان التحطيب! 🔥 🥢 أصالة الأجداد، وشهامة الرجال.. التحطيب تراثٌ يتوارثه الأجيال، وتبقى فيه الهيبة لأهلها! 💪 #حمزه_سرحان #علي_عبد_العظيم #التحطيب #تراث_الصعيد
⚔️🔥 حمزه سرحان.. شبل الصعيد في ميدان التحطيب! 🔥 🥢 أصالة الأجداد، وشهامة الرجال.. التحطيب تراثٌ يتوارثه الأجيال، وتبقى فيه الهيبة لأهلها! 💪 #حمزه_سرحان #علي_عبد_العظيم #التحطيب #تراث_الصعيد
🥺🥺🥺
🥺🥺🥺
@TV Globo @PAULO VIEIRA #paulovieiracy #avisalaqueeuvou #Xingu #povosindigenas
@TV Globo @PAULO VIEIRA #paulovieiracy #avisalaqueeuvou #Xingu #povosindigenas
#CapCut #🥺🥺 #❤️ #🥀 #زنده_باد_افغانستان_متحد_با_تمام_
#CapCut #🥺🥺 #❤️ #🥀 #زنده_باد_افغانستان_متحد_با_تمام_
#police #cops #bodycam #fyp
#police #cops #bodycam #fyp
He lost $1,800 in THREE seconds… and the comments think he made a mistake. But what if he actually made the RIGHT decision? He entered short, got stopped out, and then watched price move in the direction he originally anticipated. Naturally, the comments were full of advice. “He should've held.” “He shouldn't have used a stop-loss.” Funny how easy trading becomes when you already know what the next candle did. But here's what most retail traders misunderstand. A losing trade isn't necessarily a bad trade. And a winning trade isn't necessarily a good one. If this trader followed a properly tested strategy, respected his predetermined risk, and executed according to his rules, the trade could've been perfectly valid. Even though he lost $1,800. That's because professional trading isn't about being right on every individual trade. It's about executing a process with positive expectancy over a large sample of trades. And here's something worth remembering. The next time you evaluate a trade, ignore what happened AFTER the entry. Ask yourself what information was available BEFORE the decision was made. Did the setup meet the rules? Was the risk predefined? Was the process followed? Because if you need to see the outcome before deciding whether a trade was good… You're not evaluating the decision. You're evaluating the result. He hasn't necessarily shown you a bad trade. He's shown you a losing trade. And those are NOT the same thing. What's worse: taking a loss while following your rules, or making money by breaking them?
He lost $1,800 in THREE seconds… and the comments think he made a mistake. But what if he actually made the RIGHT decision? He entered short, got stopped out, and then watched price move in the direction he originally anticipated. Naturally, the comments were full of advice. “He should've held.” “He shouldn't have used a stop-loss.” Funny how easy trading becomes when you already know what the next candle did. But here's what most retail traders misunderstand. A losing trade isn't necessarily a bad trade. And a winning trade isn't necessarily a good one. If this trader followed a properly tested strategy, respected his predetermined risk, and executed according to his rules, the trade could've been perfectly valid. Even though he lost $1,800. That's because professional trading isn't about being right on every individual trade. It's about executing a process with positive expectancy over a large sample of trades. And here's something worth remembering. The next time you evaluate a trade, ignore what happened AFTER the entry. Ask yourself what information was available BEFORE the decision was made. Did the setup meet the rules? Was the risk predefined? Was the process followed? Because if you need to see the outcome before deciding whether a trade was good… You're not evaluating the decision. You're evaluating the result. He hasn't necessarily shown you a bad trade. He's shown you a losing trade. And those are NOT the same thing. What's worse: taking a loss while following your rules, or making money by breaking them?

About

Legal