@trueee_ewaaa: у нас нет аэрогриля #аэрогриль #щп #тренд

ТГК: тру ева🇺🇦
ТГК: тру ева🇺🇦
Open In TikTok:
Region: UA
Saturday 03 October 2026 10:57:09 GMT
1053205
103159
542
19784

Music

Download

Comments

himeraseb
Katerina :
Я не понимаю как они это слушают
2026-10-03 13:51:34
23939
mozz.animw
モッズ :
Моя мама пела со диги ди диги ди эй
2026-10-04 07:53:13
367
kizya999
Kizya999 :
Аэрогрильный дэнсинг
2026-10-03 11:04:03
46505
sirentsie
sirène :
и когда этот ужас закончится
2026-10-03 13:29:28
18679
lee_dahyun_7
신나랑해놓고 :
почему им нравятся странные звуки в песнях, глюки, такие звуки как на видео и тп
2026-10-03 16:02:35
29717
lilekpisilek
лильк :
у моей на звонке
2026-10-03 16:54:14
291
ustynna.2
⃟ :
у моей мамы весь плей-лист в ии песнях
2026-10-03 21:55:44
799
angeldev0tee
Трупна [🇺🇦] :
Точно нету аэрогриля?
2026-10-03 11:00:07
5109
karina.saakova
#brunette?🍒💞 :
У меня тетя в машине включает и подпевает…
2026-10-04 07:31:41
1332
elislay67
Elislay :
аэрогрильненько
2026-10-03 19:24:11
120
amizzerg1412
` :
реально, моя мама наверное уже месяца 3-4 слушает такие песни
2026-10-03 11:17:32
2394
lilsiiis
лиличка любимая :
даже пляшут одинаково по шаблону
2026-10-03 13:16:00
1739
sofableys
Sonechka :
у моего папы любимая песня «ты не бойся ночи ведь я рядом»..
2026-10-03 14:28:41
317
payle40
Анар Мамедов :
Я пробью свои ушные перепонки
2026-10-03 13:36:34
629
i_143f_a
-_- :
как меломан скажу, меня тоже от нее укачивает
2026-10-04 10:05:20
182
varksss2
Varksss :
закройте аэрогриль
2026-10-03 18:42:15
236
koperserr
Ermengarda :
они реально такие.. мои родители недавно справляли годовщину, все подружки мамы, от 40 до 55, отжигали только так под какие-то невыносимые ии треки😅
2026-10-03 16:38:38
123
miloadv
•Milo• :
у них свои тренды, не мешаем
2026-10-03 22:17:58
50
dashkeerr
dashkeerr👅 :
у меня папа это слушает
2026-10-03 14:23:40
47
rr.uliww
люляна рулив :
АХААХХАХХАХАХАХА ОНА МОЯ ПРОСТО
2026-10-03 15:26:43
181
kaifangel_22rus
Kaif Angel🪽 :
2026-10-03 11:27:36
60
nymera.a4
dparkris :
так и было , а я такая типа смотрю на это :
2026-10-03 11:29:15
129
lunelune075
гемоглобин :
Моя мама по этой песне фанатеет😭 помогите. Мы едем в машине она врубает это на всю, я ненавижу уже эту песню.
2026-10-03 16:14:40
111
nellokc
нелли ленивец. :
у моей мамы аэрогриль, пьет хлорофил, семейная чиа и слушает только это песню и не бойся ночи ведь я рядом
2026-10-03 19:57:32
27
drtyness
N⃫!⁹⁴ :
у меня уже истерика, моя мама включает эту песню по 20 раз за день на колонке, у меня уже тики в голове от этого дедедедедеедед
2026-10-03 22:54:23
8
To see more videos from user @trueee_ewaaa, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

A campus discussion about gender identity turns into a much bigger argument when an audience member says that trans women should be acknowledged as women after transitioning. Rather than immediately dismissing her position, the speaker asks what principle makes that identity objectively true and whether personal belief by itself is enough to determine what someone is. That question becomes the center of the entire exchange. The audience member explains that she believes transgender people should be recognized according to the gender they identify with, arguing that someone who has transitioned should be treated and described accordingly. The speaker pushes back by separating personal identity from biological reality and asks whether sincerely believing something about yourself automatically requires everyone else to accept that claim as objectively true. The conversation then reaches its most memorable moment when the speaker introduces an analogy involving children who believe they are dinosaurs. Her point is not that transgender people are literally comparable to children or dinosaurs; she is using an extreme hypothetical to argue that belief alone does not necessarily determine reality. Supporters of transgender identity would reject that comparison and argue that gender identity is a recognized social and psychological concept rather than an imaginary species claim. That is why the disagreement is really about definitions. One side treats gender identity as something people can know and declare about themselves, while the other believes sex-based categories have objective boundaries that personal identification cannot override. The dinosaur analogy gets the reaction, but the underlying question is much more serious: when someone sincerely identifies in a particular way, what makes that identity socially valid, biologically meaningful, or binding on everyone else? Until both sides agree on the standard being used, they are likely to keep giving completely different answers to the same question. #GenderDebate #Identity #CampusDebate #FreeSpeech #PublicDebate
A campus discussion about gender identity turns into a much bigger argument when an audience member says that trans women should be acknowledged as women after transitioning. Rather than immediately dismissing her position, the speaker asks what principle makes that identity objectively true and whether personal belief by itself is enough to determine what someone is. That question becomes the center of the entire exchange. The audience member explains that she believes transgender people should be recognized according to the gender they identify with, arguing that someone who has transitioned should be treated and described accordingly. The speaker pushes back by separating personal identity from biological reality and asks whether sincerely believing something about yourself automatically requires everyone else to accept that claim as objectively true. The conversation then reaches its most memorable moment when the speaker introduces an analogy involving children who believe they are dinosaurs. Her point is not that transgender people are literally comparable to children or dinosaurs; she is using an extreme hypothetical to argue that belief alone does not necessarily determine reality. Supporters of transgender identity would reject that comparison and argue that gender identity is a recognized social and psychological concept rather than an imaginary species claim. That is why the disagreement is really about definitions. One side treats gender identity as something people can know and declare about themselves, while the other believes sex-based categories have objective boundaries that personal identification cannot override. The dinosaur analogy gets the reaction, but the underlying question is much more serious: when someone sincerely identifies in a particular way, what makes that identity socially valid, biologically meaningful, or binding on everyone else? Until both sides agree on the standard being used, they are likely to keep giving completely different answers to the same question. #GenderDebate #Identity #CampusDebate #FreeSpeech #PublicDebate

About