1. Home
  2. Detail

@shopboypho.86: Áo Polo Thêu Hoạ Tiết Phối Tem Vuông Lệ Vi 🛍️🛍️ #aopolonam #aopolo #aopolohottrend #aopoloboypho

Hoàng Phan Sốp Lỏ 🛍️
Hoàng Phan Sốp Lỏ 🛍️
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Sunday 04 October 2026 08:10:15 GMT
1911
17
0
1

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (3.45MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (2.2MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.76MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @shopboypho.86, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Proti Pro Grade Rust Conversion Paint ‎ ‎#protiprograderustconversionpaint ‎#protirushconversionpaint ‎#rustconversionpaint ‎#paint ‎#protipaint
Proti Pro Grade Rust Conversion Paint ‎ ‎#protiprograderustconversionpaint ‎#protirushconversionpaint ‎#rustconversionpaint ‎#paint ‎#protipaint


Calculus really handed me THAT symbol and then said “imagine some rectangles.” Brother. I KNOW RECTANGLES. 😭 Why does ∫ look like something I need a security clearance to understand if the explanation starts with width × height? Here’s the part that finally makes the two pictures connect. We want the area underneath a curve. The curve in this video is f(x) = 1 + 2x − x², and we’re measuring from x = 0 to x = 2. A rectangle is easy. Measure its width, measure its height, multiply. So we split the region into strips and give each strip a rectangular top. Four rectangles. Four little areas. Add them together. And immediately there’s a problem. Look at the TOPS. The curve keeps bending, but each rectangle has a flat roof. Some bits stick above the curve. Other bits leave gaps underneath it. We know the rectangle areas exactly, but their total only approximates the curved region we actually wanted. Okay. Make them thinner. For this example, using the RIGHT endpoint to choose every height: 4 rectangles → 3.25 8 rectangles → 3.3125 32 rectangles → 3.33203125 128 rectangles → 3.333251953125 Those numbers are areas in square units. They’re the exact totals of those particular rectangles, and estimates of the area under our curve. Now look at where they’re heading. 3.333333… That’s 10/3. The satisfying part is that we can prove the destination. For THIS curve and these equal-width, right-endpoint rectangles, the total is: Rₙ = 10/3 − 4/(3n²) n is just how many rectangles we use. So the distance between our estimate and the exact area is 4/(3n²). Double n and that error becomes one quarter as large. Use more and more rectangles, and the error approaches zero. We never have to declare that a zero-width rectangle somehow has area. Every finite stage has actual widths and actual rectangle areas. The limit tells us the value their totals approach. That’s the step I needed someone to explain before throwing the entire symbol collection at me. Now the notation has a job: 0 and 2 tell us where the interval starts and stops. f(x) supplies the heights. Δx is the width of each finite rectangle. Σ tells us to add the rectangle areas. ∫ is the integral sign. dx identifies x as the variable we’re integrating along. In this example, Δx = 2/n. Eight rectangles means each one is 1/4 unit wide. Thirty-two means each is 1/16 unit wide. And because we chose right endpoints, each height comes from the RIGHT edge of its interval. That choice stays consistent as the boxes get thinner. Try one yourself: with four rectangles, the right endpoints are 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2. Put those into f(x), and the heights are 1.75, 2, 1.75 and 1. Each width is 0.5. 0.5 × (1.75 + 2 + 1.75 + 1) = 3.25. That is the first approximation on screen. You can check the entire thing with ordinary multiplication and addition. The curved boundary is what makes the next step interesting. We want to account for the pieces our flat rectangle tops missed or included by mistake. There’s also a shortcut once you learn antiderivatives: F(x) = x + x² − x³/3. Then F(2) − F(0) = 10/3. Same answer. The rectangle animation helps explain what that answer is measuring. One useful detail: our curve stays above the horizontal axis, so this integral equals the ordinary area pictured. Curves below the axis introduce signed contributions; that’s another lesson. Notice that the 2 above the integral is an x-position, not a height. The height at x = 2 happens to be 1 here. Mixing those up makes the notation feel much stranger than it is. The bounds tell you where to look; the function tells you how high the graph is when you get there. Save this for the day the textbook introduces definite integrals and acts like everybody already knows what the giant S is doing. Which part confused you first: the integral sign, the little dx, or how an approximation can lead to an EXACT answer? #Calculus #MathExplained #LearnMath #RiemannSums #GravityAssist
Calculus really handed me THAT symbol and then said “imagine some rectangles.” Brother. I KNOW RECTANGLES. 😭 Why does ∫ look like something I need a security clearance to understand if the explanation starts with width × height? Here’s the part that finally makes the two pictures connect. We want the area underneath a curve. The curve in this video is f(x) = 1 + 2x − x², and we’re measuring from x = 0 to x = 2. A rectangle is easy. Measure its width, measure its height, multiply. So we split the region into strips and give each strip a rectangular top. Four rectangles. Four little areas. Add them together. And immediately there’s a problem. Look at the TOPS. The curve keeps bending, but each rectangle has a flat roof. Some bits stick above the curve. Other bits leave gaps underneath it. We know the rectangle areas exactly, but their total only approximates the curved region we actually wanted. Okay. Make them thinner. For this example, using the RIGHT endpoint to choose every height: 4 rectangles → 3.25 8 rectangles → 3.3125 32 rectangles → 3.33203125 128 rectangles → 3.333251953125 Those numbers are areas in square units. They’re the exact totals of those particular rectangles, and estimates of the area under our curve. Now look at where they’re heading. 3.333333… That’s 10/3. The satisfying part is that we can prove the destination. For THIS curve and these equal-width, right-endpoint rectangles, the total is: Rₙ = 10/3 − 4/(3n²) n is just how many rectangles we use. So the distance between our estimate and the exact area is 4/(3n²). Double n and that error becomes one quarter as large. Use more and more rectangles, and the error approaches zero. We never have to declare that a zero-width rectangle somehow has area. Every finite stage has actual widths and actual rectangle areas. The limit tells us the value their totals approach. That’s the step I needed someone to explain before throwing the entire symbol collection at me. Now the notation has a job: 0 and 2 tell us where the interval starts and stops. f(x) supplies the heights. Δx is the width of each finite rectangle. Σ tells us to add the rectangle areas. ∫ is the integral sign. dx identifies x as the variable we’re integrating along. In this example, Δx = 2/n. Eight rectangles means each one is 1/4 unit wide. Thirty-two means each is 1/16 unit wide. And because we chose right endpoints, each height comes from the RIGHT edge of its interval. That choice stays consistent as the boxes get thinner. Try one yourself: with four rectangles, the right endpoints are 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2. Put those into f(x), and the heights are 1.75, 2, 1.75 and 1. Each width is 0.5. 0.5 × (1.75 + 2 + 1.75 + 1) = 3.25. That is the first approximation on screen. You can check the entire thing with ordinary multiplication and addition. The curved boundary is what makes the next step interesting. We want to account for the pieces our flat rectangle tops missed or included by mistake. There’s also a shortcut once you learn antiderivatives: F(x) = x + x² − x³/3. Then F(2) − F(0) = 10/3. Same answer. The rectangle animation helps explain what that answer is measuring. One useful detail: our curve stays above the horizontal axis, so this integral equals the ordinary area pictured. Curves below the axis introduce signed contributions; that’s another lesson. Notice that the 2 above the integral is an x-position, not a height. The height at x = 2 happens to be 1 here. Mixing those up makes the notation feel much stranger than it is. The bounds tell you where to look; the function tells you how high the graph is when you get there. Save this for the day the textbook introduces definite integrals and acts like everybody already knows what the giant S is doing. Which part confused you first: the integral sign, the little dx, or how an approximation can lead to an EXACT answer? #Calculus #MathExplained #LearnMath #RiemannSums #GravityAssist
играл systemdlc#funtime #pvp #Minecraft #fyp #encodexhd × Upload Method @encodexhd
играл systemdlc#funtime #pvp #Minecraft #fyp #encodexhd × Upload Method @encodexhd
💪 3 bài tập giúp cẳng tay to khỏe, tăng lực nắm cực hiệu quả! 🔥 Anh em lưu lại tập ngay nhé! 💥 #GymDungCach #TapCangTay #ForearmWorkout #Calisthenics #Fitness
💪 3 bài tập giúp cẳng tay to khỏe, tăng lực nắm cực hiệu quả! 🔥 Anh em lưu lại tập ngay nhé! 💥 #GymDungCach #TapCangTay #ForearmWorkout #Calisthenics #Fitness
Il trouve une vieille moto BMW 🏍️ #sadstory #fruitstory #france #brainrot
Il trouve une vieille moto BMW 🏍️ #sadstory #fruitstory #france #brainrot

About

Legal