Zach.ζ(s)
Region: US
Monday 05 October 2026 04:05:16 GMT
71517
4133
313
94
Music
Download
Comments
Pros and Joes Golf :
I need to check this with my Math Guru...Terrance Howard
2026-10-23 17:15:27
2
someone_230423 :
Zero is natural bc you can find a apple tree with 0 apples
2026-10-05 12:28:58
1100
Álvaro Lozano-Robledo :
No
2026-10-05 11:13:43
268
Veb :
0 is a positive number because it fits my computer science
2026-10-05 06:04:52
637
Csungule :
im still waiting for a hot take. literally everyone knows 0 is a natural number
2026-10-05 09:11:59
25
Hunter Kozak :
Inshallah I will never type \mathbb{W}
2026-10-05 22:15:31
11
Mae Day :
There are only three "natural" numbers, that is, numbers found in nature. 0, 1, and many.
2026-10-05 10:31:50
31
Moritz 🃏 :
0 is actually not a natural number because its easier to write \mathbb{N}_0 then \mathbb{N}\setminus {0}
2026-10-05 12:18:54
36
🍄 ℝ𝕖𝕕𝕕𝕚𝕟𝕘 🍄🟫 :
I also just like zero in the natural numbers because then it’s the set of all finite cardinality’s
2026-10-05 04:18:23
123
Matt :
if you want {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} call it the set of nonnegative integers
2026-10-05 14:02:32
8
Math Guy Dan :
currently teaching abstract algebra RN and we do not take zero to be a natural number. this absolutely makes a lot of definitions very easy to state.
2026-10-05 05:47:00
9
Nico :
N is 1,2,3... N_0 is 0,1,2...
2026-10-05 15:16:03
42
lobstercheecks :
literally bros proof:
2026-10-05 19:14:50
8
liquid soap > solid soap :
in Romania we have N with 0 in it, and N* that excludes 0
2026-10-05 17:49:04
10
tetrapal :
So it's funny because in maths, French people use different conventions. Zero is both positive and negative. We don't say "nonnegative", we say "positive" if it contains zero and "strictly positive" if zero is not included. N contains zero but N* does not. Never heard of W.
2026-10-05 15:59:55
16
andrea :
By Peano’s Axioms, 0 is a natural number.
2026-10-05 16:10:02
9
exa456 :
Don‘t let big math stop you. Comp sci stands with you!
2026-10-05 09:55:49
6
FarkleGriffen :
Just use N_1 or N_0
2026-10-05 06:12:15
13
vanille🔻 :
I've come to like Z_{>0} or N_{>0} more than Z^+ because that collides with A^+ as the set of nonempty sequences/words.
2026-10-05 05:58:55
6
World-Wide-Web :
Sure… but natural numbers are specifically positive whole numbers used for counting. Zero IS used for counting, depending on the style, but zero is neither positive nor negative, so it doesn’t qualify. Natural in this context does not mean what people project onto it.
2026-10-06 11:00:12
1
Baiselaired :
Mathematicians do not agree on this matter.
2026-10-06 01:32:54
0
carolusquintae :
what's the W set?
2026-10-06 10:25:10
0
merrill :
i agree with you. and i get that the set of natural numbers does not include 0, but we make the definitions. 0 is less of a whole number than it is a natural number, so just linguistically it makes more sense. yes math is math but we discuss it with language so it does matter. also sometimes people already include 0 when they reference the natural numbers so it's just confusing to talk about for no reason
2026-10-05 11:30:20
0
Daniel :
Any number can be a natural number
2026-10-05 14:40:55
0
T3dy :
WRONG. By Europe standard, 0 is NOT in the N set of numbers, if you want to include it, just write N0 (0 is smaller and on the bottom)
2026-10-05 13:40:41
1
To see more videos from user @zach.zeta.s, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
