1. Home
  2. Detail

@djidji_amorozo: #cejour-là

djidjiamorozo
djidjiamorozo
Open In TikTok:
Region: DZ
Monday 05 October 2026 06:29:45 GMT
5056
151
9
145

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (5.74MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (5.74MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

rachid.iften
Rachid Iften :
deux grands hommes paix à leurs âmes
2026-10-05 11:50:50
2
abdenour.meziani0
Abdenour Meziani :
Paix à leurs âmes
2026-10-05 10:21:08
2
jongorinarte
ALi boudrare :
deux géants de la culture algérienne Allah yerahemhoume
2026-10-05 14:58:21
0
mustapha.bebe
Mustapha.bebe :
Ke chaabi est typiquement Arabe
2026-10-05 12:22:22
0
azwawbellali0
azwawbellali :
paix a leurs ames , deux monuments
2026-10-05 12:51:24
0
alimanseur0
Ali Man :
kateb l'athée parle a un grand pieux
2026-10-05 14:40:03
0
mouhmahroum
mouhmahroum :
deux monstres de la culture Algérienne,paix à leurs âmes
2026-10-05 13:21:10
0
mouhmahroum
mouhmahroum :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-10-05 13:19:55
0
bellouche.nacir
Bellouche Nacir :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-10-05 11:55:46
1
To see more videos from user @djidji_amorozo, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


I pointed the crawler at my own prompts instead of the web. There are 195 prompts, and each one is treated as a decision point rather than plain text. Every prompt is evaluated through a structured set of questions: - Is it relevant? - Is it grounded? - Is it ambiguous? - Does it require approval? Each evaluation produces a probability score. The routing logic is intentionally deterministic—it has no opinions of its own. - p ≥ 0.95 → route directly into the execution/code path without invoking an LLM. - p < 0.95 → escalate to Claude Sonnet 5.5, the only model responsible for reasoning. - Anything that appears to require human approval is automatically handed off to me. In one execution: - 168 of 175 prompt decisions were resolved automatically. - 133 terminated within deterministic if branches. - 24 were escalated to Sonnet. - 11 ultimately required human approval. One interesting observation: the token
I pointed the crawler at my own prompts instead of the web. There are 195 prompts, and each one is treated as a decision point rather than plain text. Every prompt is evaluated through a structured set of questions: - Is it relevant? - Is it grounded? - Is it ambiguous? - Does it require approval? Each evaluation produces a probability score. The routing logic is intentionally deterministic—it has no opinions of its own. - p ≥ 0.95 → route directly into the execution/code path without invoking an LLM. - p < 0.95 → escalate to Claude Sonnet 5.5, the only model responsible for reasoning. - Anything that appears to require human approval is automatically handed off to me. In one execution: - 168 of 175 prompt decisions were resolved automatically. - 133 terminated within deterministic if branches. - 24 were escalated to Sonnet. - 11 ultimately required human approval. One interesting observation: the token "ask" received an approval-confidence score of 0.544. Since the system lacked sufficient confidence, it deferred the decision instead of hallucinating. The average confidence across the entire run was 0.925. Everyone is crawling the web for additional context. The real context has been sitting inside the prompt all along—it just hasn't been interpreted correctly. #xuhuong #AI
#foryou #trending #kashmir
#foryou #trending #kashmir
Nhìn em anh thấy mờ mờ, nhìn gần mới biết em mờ ê mê 🫠
Nhìn em anh thấy mờ mờ, nhìn gần mới biết em mờ ê mê 🫠

"অন্য কিছু করতে চাইলে মন থেকে ভালোবাসো বন্ধু, মন ভাঙার নিয়ম তো আজকাল ঘরে ঘরে।")

About

Legal