@cogiaohuyen8386: Ngày xưa cô ấy cũng từng là bạch nguyệt quang trong lòng của một ai đó. ❤️

Cô Giáo Huyền 👩🏻‍🏫
Cô Giáo Huyền 👩🏻‍🏫
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Tuesday 06 October 2026 00:27:00 GMT
647194
41670
280
4901

Music

Download

Comments

hoagbn.65
Cô Em Bản Chuột :
nhưng mà AI thiệt mà, mọi người joke à 😭😭
2026-10-07 03:06:58
2355
chi_can_em2
×͜×𝓛𝔂𝓸𝓷ổ𝓲𝓵𝓸ạ𝓷🎶🎶 :
ôi t nhìn ra AI
2026-10-06 08:50:39
9414
lopcuanhu
baongan💗 :
Bả xinh như AI luôn á
2026-10-06 10:14:08
351
muichiro..7324
khiên nè :
tưởng AI ko á
2026-10-06 08:18:44
1018
sora54083
🍂Bí 🎃✨ :
Al h đỉnh thật
2026-10-06 12:54:10
197
annhien1722016
𝓝𝓪 𝓸𝓵𝓪౨ৎ :
Al đó mấy má🥰
2026-10-06 12:22:10
407
sua.4905
Sứa🪼:)) :
cô đẹp như AI ln á
2026-10-06 11:52:06
52
kimngn12446
K.N :
Mới đầu tui nhìn tui tưởng AI k á
2026-10-07 04:01:27
45
...ht4.25
hthuy :
má tưởng AI
2026-10-06 13:20:12
13
user96186295460582
hoangnghia :
t nhìn ra ai
2026-10-06 11:50:17
37
emdengbeos
denq :
lo cho mấy bạn k biết đây là AI -)) sợ các b ý bị dụ
2026-10-07 12:00:29
38
you_stupidly
🫧tamami🫧 :
Tr tr, vẻ đẹp này là cs thiệt
2026-10-07 10:17:51
7
nht.vy649
Nhật Vy🌸 :
Ê sao bạch nguyệt quang này xinh như AI lun Đỉnh tht
2026-10-06 22:31:00
8
.dauuiuu
dâuuiu🍓🐰 :
thì ra AI cũng chụp đi chụp lại một góc góc mặt đẹp
2026-10-06 11:39:21
12
su.v.cn6
ngkhanh. ᴥ :
cô dạy trường AI à cô🥰
2026-10-06 09:46:22
10
baominh.13_
Lốp :
AI giống thật dữ
2026-10-06 09:57:49
8
caonhoem096202
Đỗ HSK7 đổi tên 🦊💙 :
bạch nguyệt quang là đây sao 😍😍
2026-10-06 02:44:46
6
paokdp_
tự kỷ giai đoạn cuối :
AI chuyển động thì nó sẽ bị nnay:)))
2026-10-06 16:30:23
7
kim.hnqq
Kim Hằnqq :
Al à ae
2026-10-06 13:05:25
8
pbq1902
Khê :
Cô có chồng chưa
2026-10-07 22:41:59
0
mandautauy
🗣️M.anhh👤🖤 :
Ai giờ đỉnh thật 🥲
2026-10-07 08:49:44
0
5th9zoa
💔 :
nhìn như Al á
2026-10-06 23:03:29
0
sv.3107
Hi ✌️ :
Sao mọi ng bảo AI hết dị. Tui muốn xin in4 bộ áo dài
2026-10-07 06:07:26
0
_connguoilacloai_
.....? :
cô có thật ngoài đời ko ạ
2026-10-07 15:31:47
1
pon_nee
Pon :
Đẹp như AI lun á 😳
2026-10-07 03:41:40
0
To see more videos from user @cogiaohuyen8386, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham’s number is one of the most famously enormous numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It is so unimaginably large that trying to write it out in ordinary decimal notation is completely pointless. Even if every particle in the observable universe were turned into a tiny computer capable of writing billions of digits every second, there would still not be remotely enough space or time to write down all of its digits. Graham’s number appeared in a problem from Ramsey theory, a branch of mathematics that studies how order and patterns inevitably appear inside sufficiently large structures. It was used as an upper bound in a problem involving the coloring of the edges of a high-dimensional hypercube. The important thing is that Graham’s number was not invented simply to create a ridiculously large number — it appeared naturally in a legitimate mathematical argument. But what makes Graham’s number truly absurd is the way it is constructed. Normal mathematical notation is nowhere near powerful enough to describe it efficiently. Even something like 10^100, known as a googol, is already far larger than the number of atoms estimated to exist in the observable universe. A googol has only 101 digits, while the observable universe contains roughly 10^80 atoms. A googolplex is even larger: it is 10^(10^100). Writing out a googolplex in decimal form would require more digits than there are atoms in the observable universe. And Graham’s number makes a googolplex look microscopic. To define Graham’s number, mathematician Ronald Graham used a notation called Knuth’s up-arrow notation. In this system, a single arrow represents exponentiation. Two arrows represent repeated exponentiation, or tetration. Three arrows represent an even more powerful operation, and adding more arrows creates operations that grow unbelievably quickly. For example, 3 ↑ 3 means 3³, which is 27. But 3 ↑↑ 3 means 3^(3^3), which is already 3^27. Then 3 ↑↑↑ 3 is vastly larger still. Graham’s number begins with a number called g₁, defined as: g₁ = 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 Even g₁ is already far beyond anything that could be physically written down. But that is only the beginning. The next number is defined using the previous number itself: g₂ = 3 ↑^(g₁) 3 This means that there are g₁ arrows between the two 3s. Then: g₃ = 3 ↑^(g₂) 3 And this process continues. Each new number uses the previous number as the number of arrows in the next expression. Finally, Graham’s number is: G = g₆₄ That means Graham’s number is the 64th number in this rapidly growing sequence. The strange thing is that although Graham’s number is incomprehensibly large, mathematicians can still work with it precisely because its definition is finite and exact. We do not need to write down every digit to know what the number is. Its mathematical definition completely specifies it. And there is an even crazier detail. Although Graham’s number is unimaginably large, mathematicians eventually calculated some of its final digits. This is possible because enormous numbers can have mathematical properties that allow specific parts of them to be determined without calculating the entire number. The last digits of Graham’s number are: …2464195387 So despite the fact that almost none of the number can ever be written out, we can still know what some of its final digits are. Graham’s number is also nowhere near the largest number that can be described in mathematics. There are many numbers that are vastly, vastly larger, including numbers constructed using more powerful mathematical systems and definitions. In fact, compared with some other famous large numbers, Graham’s number is surprisingly small. This is one of the most fascinating things about mathematics: there is no practical limit to how large a finite number can become. You can always construct a new number that is larger than the previous one.#fyp #рек #History #germany #hate
Graham’s number is one of the most famously enormous numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It is so unimaginably large that trying to write it out in ordinary decimal notation is completely pointless. Even if every particle in the observable universe were turned into a tiny computer capable of writing billions of digits every second, there would still not be remotely enough space or time to write down all of its digits. Graham’s number appeared in a problem from Ramsey theory, a branch of mathematics that studies how order and patterns inevitably appear inside sufficiently large structures. It was used as an upper bound in a problem involving the coloring of the edges of a high-dimensional hypercube. The important thing is that Graham’s number was not invented simply to create a ridiculously large number — it appeared naturally in a legitimate mathematical argument. But what makes Graham’s number truly absurd is the way it is constructed. Normal mathematical notation is nowhere near powerful enough to describe it efficiently. Even something like 10^100, known as a googol, is already far larger than the number of atoms estimated to exist in the observable universe. A googol has only 101 digits, while the observable universe contains roughly 10^80 atoms. A googolplex is even larger: it is 10^(10^100). Writing out a googolplex in decimal form would require more digits than there are atoms in the observable universe. And Graham’s number makes a googolplex look microscopic. To define Graham’s number, mathematician Ronald Graham used a notation called Knuth’s up-arrow notation. In this system, a single arrow represents exponentiation. Two arrows represent repeated exponentiation, or tetration. Three arrows represent an even more powerful operation, and adding more arrows creates operations that grow unbelievably quickly. For example, 3 ↑ 3 means 3³, which is 27. But 3 ↑↑ 3 means 3^(3^3), which is already 3^27. Then 3 ↑↑↑ 3 is vastly larger still. Graham’s number begins with a number called g₁, defined as: g₁ = 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 Even g₁ is already far beyond anything that could be physically written down. But that is only the beginning. The next number is defined using the previous number itself: g₂ = 3 ↑^(g₁) 3 This means that there are g₁ arrows between the two 3s. Then: g₃ = 3 ↑^(g₂) 3 And this process continues. Each new number uses the previous number as the number of arrows in the next expression. Finally, Graham’s number is: G = g₆₄ That means Graham’s number is the 64th number in this rapidly growing sequence. The strange thing is that although Graham’s number is incomprehensibly large, mathematicians can still work with it precisely because its definition is finite and exact. We do not need to write down every digit to know what the number is. Its mathematical definition completely specifies it. And there is an even crazier detail. Although Graham’s number is unimaginably large, mathematicians eventually calculated some of its final digits. This is possible because enormous numbers can have mathematical properties that allow specific parts of them to be determined without calculating the entire number. The last digits of Graham’s number are: …2464195387 So despite the fact that almost none of the number can ever be written out, we can still know what some of its final digits are. Graham’s number is also nowhere near the largest number that can be described in mathematics. There are many numbers that are vastly, vastly larger, including numbers constructed using more powerful mathematical systems and definitions. In fact, compared with some other famous large numbers, Graham’s number is surprisingly small. This is one of the most fascinating things about mathematics: there is no practical limit to how large a finite number can become. You can always construct a new number that is larger than the previous one.#fyp #рек #History #germany #hate

About